Conservative interventions for urinary or faecal incontinence, or both, in adults with multiple sclerosis

Nikki Cotterill*, Amanda Sullivan, Christine Norton, Alastair Wilkins, Iain Weir, Mary Kilonzo, Marcus J. Drake

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of conservative interventions for urinary or faecal incontinence (or both) in adults with multiple sclerosis, compared to no treatment, sham and usual care, any other active treatment, or another conservative treatment. To critically appraise and summarise the current evidence on resource use, costs and cost effectiveness of conservative interventions for adults with urinary or faecal incontinence (or both) and MS. We will make the following comparisons.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD013150
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume2018
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conservative interventions for urinary or faecal incontinence, or both, in adults with multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this