Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To assess the effects of conservative interventions for urinary or faecal incontinence (or both) in adults with multiple sclerosis, compared to no treatment, sham and usual care, any other active treatment, or another conservative treatment. To critically appraise and summarise the current evidence on resource use, costs and cost effectiveness of conservative interventions for adults with urinary or faecal incontinence (or both) and MS. We will make the following comparisons.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | CD013150 |
| Journal | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
| Volume | 2018 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Oct 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:• North Bristol NHS Trust, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (CLAHRC West), University of the West of England, UK. Nikki Cotterill’s time is partially funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (CLAHRC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust. Nikki Cotterill’s time is also partially funded by North Bristol NHS Trust and the Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the employing institutions.
• MS Society, UK. Nikki Cotterill receives project funding for this review from the MS Society through a Junior Fellowship personal award. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the project funder.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration.