Conservative management vs intervention for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: reply

Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Carl E Counsell; Philip M White

doi:10.1001/jama.2014.8759

Conservative management vs intervention for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: reply

Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Carl E Counsell, Philip M White

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neurosurgical colleagues have raised issues about our study comparing conservative management and intervention for unruptured bAVMs that do not invalidate our findings but instead provide an opportunity to give more detail, correct misinterpretations, and reemphasize the hierarchy of evidence

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1058-1059
Number of pages	2
Journal	JAMA
Volume	312
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.8759
Publication status	Published - 10 Sept 2014

Access to Document

10.1001/jama.2014.8759

Cite this

@article{bf82acad86d444fa9237dcb365aa136a,

title = "Conservative management vs intervention for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: reply",

abstract = "Neurosurgical colleagues have raised issues about our study comparing conservative management and intervention for unruptured bAVMs that do not invalidate our findings but instead provide an opportunity to give more detail, correct misinterpretations, and reemphasize the hierarchy of evidence",

author = "{Al-Shahi Salman}, Rustam and Counsell, {Carl E} and White, {Philip M}",

year = "2014",

month = sep,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1001/jama.2014.8759",

language = "English",

volume = "312",

pages = "1058--1059",

journal = "JAMA",

issn = "0098-7484",

publisher = "American Medical Association",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservative management vs intervention for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations

T2 - reply

AU - Al-Shahi Salman, Rustam

AU - Counsell, Carl E

AU - White, Philip M

PY - 2014/9/10

Y1 - 2014/9/10

N2 - Neurosurgical colleagues have raised issues about our study comparing conservative management and intervention for unruptured bAVMs that do not invalidate our findings but instead provide an opportunity to give more detail, correct misinterpretations, and reemphasize the hierarchy of evidence

AB - Neurosurgical colleagues have raised issues about our study comparing conservative management and intervention for unruptured bAVMs that do not invalidate our findings but instead provide an opportunity to give more detail, correct misinterpretations, and reemphasize the hierarchy of evidence

U2 - 10.1001/jama.2014.8759

DO - 10.1001/jama.2014.8759

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 25203089

SN - 0098-7484

VL - 312

SP - 1058

EP - 1059

JO - JAMA

JF - JAMA

IS - 10

ER -

Conservative management vs intervention for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations: reply

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this