Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials

C M A Glazener, C Boachie, B Buckley, C Cochran, G Dorey, A Grant, S Hagen, M Kilonzo, A McDonald, G McPherson, K Moore, J N'Dow, J D T Norrie, C Ramsay, L Vale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of active conservative treatment, compared with standard management, in regaining urinary continence at 12 months in men with urinary incontinence at 6 weeks after a radical prostatectomy or a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-290
Number of pages290
JournalHealth Technology Assessment
Volume15
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Keywords

  • aged
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • erectile dysfunction
  • exercise therapy
  • humans
  • male
  • middle aged
  • pelvic floor
  • prostatectomy
  • prostatic neoplasms
  • quality-adjusted life years
  • socioeconomic factors
  • standard of care
  • transurethral resection of prostate
  • urinary incontinence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this