Constructing a Shared Public Identity in Ethnonationally Divided Societies: Comparing Consociational and Transformationist Perspectives

John Michael Nagle, Mary-Alice Clancy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to bolster sustainable peace building in violently divided societies, a normative suggestion is that efforts should be made to construct a shared public identity that overarches ethnic divisions. A number of different centripetal/transformationist processes are identified as engineering a shared identity in comparison to consociational arrangements, which are accused of institutionalising ethnic differences and perpetuating conflict. These transformationist approaches essentially rest on the premise that because ethnicity is constructed it can be reconstructed into new, shared forms. Looking at Northern Ireland, we argue that there are limits to the extent that ethnicity can be reconstructed into shared identities. By analysing consociational and centripetalist/transformationist approaches to division, we conclude that although consociationalism will probably not deliver a common identity, it does provide a robust form of conflict regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-97
Number of pages20
JournalNations and Nationalism
Volume18
Issue number1
Early online date14 Jan 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

ethnicity
society
engineering
accused
peace
regulation
conflict
public
comparison
Ethnic Groups

Keywords

  • consociationalism
  • centripetalism
  • divided societies
  • ethno nationalism
  • Northern Ireland

Cite this

@article{00d5dc78154a4ec4bfd1561d755d9340,
title = "Constructing a Shared Public Identity in Ethnonationally Divided Societies: Comparing Consociational and Transformationist Perspectives",
abstract = "In order to bolster sustainable peace building in violently divided societies, a normative suggestion is that efforts should be made to construct a shared public identity that overarches ethnic divisions. A number of different centripetal/transformationist processes are identified as engineering a shared identity in comparison to consociational arrangements, which are accused of institutionalising ethnic differences and perpetuating conflict. These transformationist approaches essentially rest on the premise that because ethnicity is constructed it can be reconstructed into new, shared forms. Looking at Northern Ireland, we argue that there are limits to the extent that ethnicity can be reconstructed into shared identities. By analysing consociational and centripetalist/transformationist approaches to division, we conclude that although consociationalism will probably not deliver a common identity, it does provide a robust form of conflict regulation.",
keywords = "consociationalism , centripetalism , divided societies, ethno nationalism , Northern Ireland",
author = "Nagle, {John Michael} and Mary-Alice Clancy",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00474.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "78--97",
journal = "Nations and Nationalism",
issn = "1354-5078",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing a Shared Public Identity in Ethnonationally Divided Societies

T2 - Comparing Consociational and Transformationist Perspectives

AU - Nagle, John Michael

AU - Clancy, Mary-Alice

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - In order to bolster sustainable peace building in violently divided societies, a normative suggestion is that efforts should be made to construct a shared public identity that overarches ethnic divisions. A number of different centripetal/transformationist processes are identified as engineering a shared identity in comparison to consociational arrangements, which are accused of institutionalising ethnic differences and perpetuating conflict. These transformationist approaches essentially rest on the premise that because ethnicity is constructed it can be reconstructed into new, shared forms. Looking at Northern Ireland, we argue that there are limits to the extent that ethnicity can be reconstructed into shared identities. By analysing consociational and centripetalist/transformationist approaches to division, we conclude that although consociationalism will probably not deliver a common identity, it does provide a robust form of conflict regulation.

AB - In order to bolster sustainable peace building in violently divided societies, a normative suggestion is that efforts should be made to construct a shared public identity that overarches ethnic divisions. A number of different centripetal/transformationist processes are identified as engineering a shared identity in comparison to consociational arrangements, which are accused of institutionalising ethnic differences and perpetuating conflict. These transformationist approaches essentially rest on the premise that because ethnicity is constructed it can be reconstructed into new, shared forms. Looking at Northern Ireland, we argue that there are limits to the extent that ethnicity can be reconstructed into shared identities. By analysing consociational and centripetalist/transformationist approaches to division, we conclude that although consociationalism will probably not deliver a common identity, it does provide a robust form of conflict regulation.

KW - consociationalism

KW - centripetalism

KW - divided societies

KW - ethno nationalism

KW - Northern Ireland

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00474.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00474.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 78

EP - 97

JO - Nations and Nationalism

JF - Nations and Nationalism

SN - 1354-5078

IS - 1

ER -