Constructing the crystal ball

how to get reliable prognostic information for the management of subfertile couples

R van Eekelen, N van Geloven, M van Wely, D J McLernon, M J Eijkemans, S Repping, E W Steyerberg, B W Mol, S Bhattacharya, F van der Veen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Couples in whom the results of an initial fertility workup fail to identify the presence of any obvious barriers to conception are diagnosed with unexplained subfertility. Couples who have tried to conceive for a relatively short time have a good chance of natural conception and thus may not benefit from immediate access to ART. As fertility decreases over time, the main dilemma that clinicians and couples face is when to abandon an expectant approach in favour of active treatment. Several prognostic or predictive models have been used to try to discriminate between couples with high and low chances of conception but have been unable to compare individualized chances of conception associated with ART relative to chances of natural conception at various time points. These models are also unable to recalculate the chances of pregnancy at subsequent time points in those who return after a period of unsuccessful expectant management. In this paper, we discuss currently available models. We conclude that in order to provide accurate, individualized and dynamic fertility prognoses associated with and without treatment at different points in time, we need to develop, validate and update clinical prediction models which are fit for purpose. We suggest several steps to move the field forwards.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2153-2158
Number of pages6
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume32
Issue number11
Early online date12 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Information Management
Fertility
Infertility
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • unexplained subfertility
  • prognosis
  • natural conception
  • ART
  • prediction models
  • dynamic prediction

Cite this

van Eekelen, R., van Geloven, N., van Wely, M., McLernon, D. J., Eijkemans, M. J., Repping, S., ... van der Veen, F. (2017). Constructing the crystal ball: how to get reliable prognostic information for the management of subfertile couples. Human Reproduction, 32(11), 2153-2158. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex311

Constructing the crystal ball : how to get reliable prognostic information for the management of subfertile couples. / van Eekelen, R; van Geloven, N; van Wely, M; McLernon, D J; Eijkemans, M J; Repping, S; Steyerberg, E W; Mol, B W; Bhattacharya, S; van der Veen, F.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 32, No. 11, 01.11.2017, p. 2153-2158.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

van Eekelen, R, van Geloven, N, van Wely, M, McLernon, DJ, Eijkemans, MJ, Repping, S, Steyerberg, EW, Mol, BW, Bhattacharya, S & van der Veen, F 2017, 'Constructing the crystal ball: how to get reliable prognostic information for the management of subfertile couples', Human Reproduction, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2153-2158. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex311
van Eekelen, R ; van Geloven, N ; van Wely, M ; McLernon, D J ; Eijkemans, M J ; Repping, S ; Steyerberg, E W ; Mol, B W ; Bhattacharya, S ; van der Veen, F. / Constructing the crystal ball : how to get reliable prognostic information for the management of subfertile couples. In: Human Reproduction. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 11. pp. 2153-2158.
@article{d57c07c51fdf4b9db005f07a6683fd5c,
title = "Constructing the crystal ball: how to get reliable prognostic information for the management of subfertile couples",
abstract = "Couples in whom the results of an initial fertility workup fail to identify the presence of any obvious barriers to conception are diagnosed with unexplained subfertility. Couples who have tried to conceive for a relatively short time have a good chance of natural conception and thus may not benefit from immediate access to ART. As fertility decreases over time, the main dilemma that clinicians and couples face is when to abandon an expectant approach in favour of active treatment. Several prognostic or predictive models have been used to try to discriminate between couples with high and low chances of conception but have been unable to compare individualized chances of conception associated with ART relative to chances of natural conception at various time points. These models are also unable to recalculate the chances of pregnancy at subsequent time points in those who return after a period of unsuccessful expectant management. In this paper, we discuss currently available models. We conclude that in order to provide accurate, individualized and dynamic fertility prognoses associated with and without treatment at different points in time, we need to develop, validate and update clinical prediction models which are fit for purpose. We suggest several steps to move the field forwards.",
keywords = "Journal Article, unexplained subfertility, prognosis, natural conception, ART, prediction models, dynamic prediction",
author = "{van Eekelen}, R and {van Geloven}, N and {van Wely}, M and McLernon, {D J} and Eijkemans, {M J} and S Repping and Steyerberg, {E W} and Mol, {B W} and S Bhattacharya and {van der Veen}, F",
note = "Acknowledgements The author group would like to thank Prof. Egbert te Velde for all of his efforts regarding the present manuscript, including his work on the first draft and his insightful remarks during the process. Funding B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548)",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/dex311",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "2153--2158",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing the crystal ball

T2 - how to get reliable prognostic information for the management of subfertile couples

AU - van Eekelen, R

AU - van Geloven, N

AU - van Wely, M

AU - McLernon, D J

AU - Eijkemans, M J

AU - Repping, S

AU - Steyerberg, E W

AU - Mol, B W

AU - Bhattacharya, S

AU - van der Veen, F

N1 - Acknowledgements The author group would like to thank Prof. Egbert te Velde for all of his efforts regarding the present manuscript, including his work on the first draft and his insightful remarks during the process. Funding B.W.M. is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548)

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Couples in whom the results of an initial fertility workup fail to identify the presence of any obvious barriers to conception are diagnosed with unexplained subfertility. Couples who have tried to conceive for a relatively short time have a good chance of natural conception and thus may not benefit from immediate access to ART. As fertility decreases over time, the main dilemma that clinicians and couples face is when to abandon an expectant approach in favour of active treatment. Several prognostic or predictive models have been used to try to discriminate between couples with high and low chances of conception but have been unable to compare individualized chances of conception associated with ART relative to chances of natural conception at various time points. These models are also unable to recalculate the chances of pregnancy at subsequent time points in those who return after a period of unsuccessful expectant management. In this paper, we discuss currently available models. We conclude that in order to provide accurate, individualized and dynamic fertility prognoses associated with and without treatment at different points in time, we need to develop, validate and update clinical prediction models which are fit for purpose. We suggest several steps to move the field forwards.

AB - Couples in whom the results of an initial fertility workup fail to identify the presence of any obvious barriers to conception are diagnosed with unexplained subfertility. Couples who have tried to conceive for a relatively short time have a good chance of natural conception and thus may not benefit from immediate access to ART. As fertility decreases over time, the main dilemma that clinicians and couples face is when to abandon an expectant approach in favour of active treatment. Several prognostic or predictive models have been used to try to discriminate between couples with high and low chances of conception but have been unable to compare individualized chances of conception associated with ART relative to chances of natural conception at various time points. These models are also unable to recalculate the chances of pregnancy at subsequent time points in those who return after a period of unsuccessful expectant management. In this paper, we discuss currently available models. We conclude that in order to provide accurate, individualized and dynamic fertility prognoses associated with and without treatment at different points in time, we need to develop, validate and update clinical prediction models which are fit for purpose. We suggest several steps to move the field forwards.

KW - Journal Article

KW - unexplained subfertility

KW - prognosis

KW - natural conception

KW - ART

KW - prediction models

KW - dynamic prediction

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/dex311

DO - 10.1093/humrep/dex311

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 2153

EP - 2158

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 11

ER -