Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies

Robert J. Johnston (Corresponding Author), Kevin J. Boyle, Wiktor (Vic) Adamowicz, Jeff Bennett, Roy Brouwer, Trudy Ann Cameron, W. Michael Hanemann, Nick Hanley, Mandy Ryan, Riccardo Scarpa, Roger Tourangeau, Christian A. Vossler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision-making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health, but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date29 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

contingent valuation
nongovernmental organization
decision making
recommendation
experiment
decision making support
human health
method

Keywords

  • choice experiment
  • choice modelling
  • contingent valuation
  • guidelines
  • non-market valuation
  • questionnaire
  • stated preference
  • survey

Cite this

Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W. V., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., ... Vossler, C. A. (2017). Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/691697

Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. / Johnston, Robert J. (Corresponding Author); Boyle, Kevin J.; Adamowicz, Wiktor (Vic) ; Bennett, Jeff ; Brouwer, Roy ; Cameron, Trudy Ann ; Hanemann, W. Michael ; Hanley, Nick; Ryan, Mandy; Scarpa, Riccardo ; Tourangeau, Roger ; Vossler, Christian A. .

In: Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Vol. 4, No. 2, 06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnston, RJ, Boyle, KJ, Adamowicz, WV, Bennett, J, Brouwer, R, Cameron, TA, Hanemann, WM, Hanley, N, Ryan, M, Scarpa, R, Tourangeau, R & Vossler, CA 2017, 'Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies', Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1086/691697
Johnston, Robert J. ; Boyle, Kevin J. ; Adamowicz, Wiktor (Vic) ; Bennett, Jeff ; Brouwer, Roy ; Cameron, Trudy Ann ; Hanemann, W. Michael ; Hanley, Nick ; Ryan, Mandy ; Scarpa, Riccardo ; Tourangeau, Roger ; Vossler, Christian A. . / Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. In: Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. 2017 ; Vol. 4, No. 2.
@article{ce1b68c07ea04e398470d124baa93add,
title = "Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies",
abstract = "This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision-making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health, but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.",
keywords = "choice experiment, choice modelling, contingent valuation, guidelines, non-market valuation, questionnaire, stated preference, survey",
author = "Johnston, {Robert J.} and Boyle, {Kevin J.} and Adamowicz, {Wiktor (Vic)} and Jeff Bennett and Roy Brouwer and Cameron, {Trudy Ann} and Hanemann, {W. Michael} and Nick Hanley and Mandy Ryan and Riccardo Scarpa and Roger Tourangeau and Vossler, {Christian A.}",
note = "We gratefully acknowledge all those who provided input and feedback, including those who provided written comments, as well as attendees at our sessions at the World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists in 2014, and the International Choice Modeling Conference (ICMC), Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) Annual Meeting, and European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE) Annual Meeting, all in 2015. We thank Cathy Kling for moderating the 2015 AERE session. We also thank Kathryn Adamowicz, Mimi Berberian, Lu Ann Pacenka and Weizhe Weng for editorial assistance.",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1086/691697",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists",
issn = "2333-5963",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies

AU - Johnston, Robert J.

AU - Boyle, Kevin J.

AU - Adamowicz, Wiktor (Vic)

AU - Bennett, Jeff

AU - Brouwer, Roy

AU - Cameron, Trudy Ann

AU - Hanemann, W. Michael

AU - Hanley, Nick

AU - Ryan, Mandy

AU - Scarpa, Riccardo

AU - Tourangeau, Roger

AU - Vossler, Christian A.

N1 - We gratefully acknowledge all those who provided input and feedback, including those who provided written comments, as well as attendees at our sessions at the World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists in 2014, and the International Choice Modeling Conference (ICMC), Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) Annual Meeting, and European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE) Annual Meeting, all in 2015. We thank Cathy Kling for moderating the 2015 AERE session. We also thank Kathryn Adamowicz, Mimi Berberian, Lu Ann Pacenka and Weizhe Weng for editorial assistance.

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision-making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health, but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.

AB - This article proposes contemporary best-practice recommendations for stated preference (SP) studies used to inform decision-making, grounded in the accumulated body of peer-reviewed literature. These recommendations consider the use of SP methods to estimate both use and non-use (passive-use) values, and cover the broad SP domain including contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. We focus on applications to public goods in the context of the environment and human health, but also consider ways in which the proposed recommendations might apply to other common areas of application. The recommendations recognize that SP results may be used and reused (benefit transfers) by governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and that all such applications must be considered. The intended result is a set of guidelines for SP studies that is more comprehensive than that of the original National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on contingent valuation, is more germane to contemporary applications, and reflects the two decades of research since that time. We also distinguish between practices for which accumulated research is sufficient to support recommendations and those for which greater uncertainty remains. The goal of this article is to raise the quality of SP studies used to support decision making and promote research that will further enhance the practice of these studies worldwide.

KW - choice experiment

KW - choice modelling

KW - contingent valuation

KW - guidelines

KW - non-market valuation

KW - questionnaire

KW - stated preference

KW - survey

U2 - 10.1086/691697

DO - 10.1086/691697

M3 - Article

VL - 4

JO - Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

JF - Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

SN - 2333-5963

IS - 2

ER -