Content validity of measures of theoretical constructs in health psychology: Discriminant content validity is needed

Diane Dixon, Marie Johnston

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many of the theoretical constructs and outcomes of interest to health psychology cannot be objectively assessed. For example, phenomena such as beliefs, pain, health, quality of life, stress, intention, illness representations are all of interest but none are available for direct measurement. Rather, the measurement of such theoretical constructs is an inferential process requiring the development of instruments that assess the target construct indirectly, typically using questionnaire‐based measures. Establishing and reporting the psychometric properties of such measures is challenging but fundamental to their utility in testing theory, designing and evaluating interventions and making clinical and policy decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)477-484
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Health Psychology
Volume24
Issue number3
Early online date7 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Content validity of measures of theoretical constructs in health psychology: Discriminant content validity is needed'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this