Contesting European Regions

Michael Keating

doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1227777

Contesting European Regions

Michael Keating

Politics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Contesting European regions. Regional Studies. A regional or ‘meso’-level of regulation and policy-making has emerged in Europe. This cannot adequately be explained by functional imperatives or drivers. A constructivist perspective sees the region as the outcome of political contestation over the definition and meaning of territory. Six competing conceptual frames for regionalism are proposed: integrative; competitive; welfare; identity; government; and the region as a refraction of social and economic interests. Any given case will reflect a balance among these conceptions. Such an understanding permits a combination of comparative analysis with an understanding of individual cases and avoids both dismissal of territory and territorial determinism.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	9-18
Number of pages	10
Journal	Regional Studies
Volume	51
Issue number	1
Early online date	11 Oct 2016
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1227777
Publication status	Published - 1 Feb 2017

Keywords

regions
rescaling
regionalism

Access to Document

10.1080/00343404.2016.1227777Licence: CC BY

Contesting European regions
© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Final published version, 573 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{37f7b239411846708c970c85325f333e,

title = "Contesting European Regions",

abstract = "Contesting European regions. Regional Studies. A regional or {\textquoteleft}meso{\textquoteright}-level of regulation and policy-making has emerged in Europe. This cannot adequately be explained by functional imperatives or drivers. A constructivist perspective sees the region as the outcome of political contestation over the definition and meaning of territory. Six competing conceptual frames for regionalism are proposed: integrative; competitive; welfare; identity; government; and the region as a refraction of social and economic interests. Any given case will reflect a balance among these conceptions. Such an understanding permits a combination of comparative analysis with an understanding of individual cases and avoids both dismissal of territory and territorial determinism.",

keywords = "regions, rescaling, regionalism",

author = "Michael Keating",

note = "The research on which this paper is based was conducted under an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Professorial Fellowship [grant number RES-051-27-0302].",

year = "2017",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1080/00343404.2016.1227777",

language = "English",

volume = "51",

pages = "9--18",

journal = "Regional Studies",

issn = "0034-3404",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contesting European Regions

AU - Keating, Michael

N1 - The research on which this paper is based was conducted under an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Professorial Fellowship [grant number RES-051-27-0302].

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Contesting European regions. Regional Studies. A regional or ‘meso’-level of regulation and policy-making has emerged in Europe. This cannot adequately be explained by functional imperatives or drivers. A constructivist perspective sees the region as the outcome of political contestation over the definition and meaning of territory. Six competing conceptual frames for regionalism are proposed: integrative; competitive; welfare; identity; government; and the region as a refraction of social and economic interests. Any given case will reflect a balance among these conceptions. Such an understanding permits a combination of comparative analysis with an understanding of individual cases and avoids both dismissal of territory and territorial determinism.

AB - Contesting European regions. Regional Studies. A regional or ‘meso’-level of regulation and policy-making has emerged in Europe. This cannot adequately be explained by functional imperatives or drivers. A constructivist perspective sees the region as the outcome of political contestation over the definition and meaning of territory. Six competing conceptual frames for regionalism are proposed: integrative; competitive; welfare; identity; government; and the region as a refraction of social and economic interests. Any given case will reflect a balance among these conceptions. Such an understanding permits a combination of comparative analysis with an understanding of individual cases and avoids both dismissal of territory and territorial determinism.

KW - regions

KW - rescaling

KW - regionalism

U2 - 10.1080/00343404.2016.1227777

DO - 10.1080/00343404.2016.1227777

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 9

EP - 18

JO - Regional Studies

JF - Regional Studies

SN - 0034-3404

IS - 1

ER -

Contesting European Regions

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this