Contextualism and the principle of tolerance

Paula Sweeney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When we bring together certain plausible and compatible principles guiding the use of vague predicates the inclination to accept that vague predicates are tolerant is significantly weakened. As the principle of tolerance is a troublesome, paradox inducing principle, a theory giving a satisfactory account of the nature of vague predicates and accounting for the appeal of the sorites paradox, without recourse to the principle of tolerance is a worthy addition to the vagueness debate. The theory offered, Contextual Intolerance, draws considerably on Sainsbury’s (1996) thesis of the boundarylessness of vague concepts and on the contextualist theories of vagueness offered by Stewart Shapiro (2003, 2006) and Diana Raffman (1994).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-306
Number of pages18
JournalGrazer Philosophische Studien
Volume90
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jan 0201
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Contextualism
Tolerance
Vagueness
Inclination
Intolerance
Contextual
Paradox
Sorites Paradox

Cite this

Contextualism and the principle of tolerance. / Sweeney, Paula.

In: Grazer Philosophische Studien, Vol. 90, No. 1, 04.2015, p. 289-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sweeney, Paula. / Contextualism and the principle of tolerance. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien. 2015 ; Vol. 90, No. 1. pp. 289-306.
@article{bf47e92f7f08462b82a7baea0a235c41,
title = "Contextualism and the principle of tolerance",
abstract = "When we bring together certain plausible and compatible principles guiding the use of vague predicates the inclination to accept that vague predicates are tolerant is significantly weakened. As the principle of tolerance is a troublesome, paradox inducing principle, a theory giving a satisfactory account of the nature of vague predicates and accounting for the appeal of the sorites paradox, without recourse to the principle of tolerance is a worthy addition to the vagueness debate. The theory offered, Contextual Intolerance, draws considerably on Sainsbury’s (1996) thesis of the boundarylessness of vague concepts and on the contextualist theories of vagueness offered by Stewart Shapiro (2003, 2006) and Diana Raffman (1994).",
author = "Paula Sweeney",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1163/9789004298767_018",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "289--306",
journal = "Grazer Philosophische Studien",
issn = "0165-9227",
publisher = "Editions Rodopi b.v.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contextualism and the principle of tolerance

AU - Sweeney, Paula

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - When we bring together certain plausible and compatible principles guiding the use of vague predicates the inclination to accept that vague predicates are tolerant is significantly weakened. As the principle of tolerance is a troublesome, paradox inducing principle, a theory giving a satisfactory account of the nature of vague predicates and accounting for the appeal of the sorites paradox, without recourse to the principle of tolerance is a worthy addition to the vagueness debate. The theory offered, Contextual Intolerance, draws considerably on Sainsbury’s (1996) thesis of the boundarylessness of vague concepts and on the contextualist theories of vagueness offered by Stewart Shapiro (2003, 2006) and Diana Raffman (1994).

AB - When we bring together certain plausible and compatible principles guiding the use of vague predicates the inclination to accept that vague predicates are tolerant is significantly weakened. As the principle of tolerance is a troublesome, paradox inducing principle, a theory giving a satisfactory account of the nature of vague predicates and accounting for the appeal of the sorites paradox, without recourse to the principle of tolerance is a worthy addition to the vagueness debate. The theory offered, Contextual Intolerance, draws considerably on Sainsbury’s (1996) thesis of the boundarylessness of vague concepts and on the contextualist theories of vagueness offered by Stewart Shapiro (2003, 2006) and Diana Raffman (1994).

U2 - 10.1163/9789004298767_018

DO - 10.1163/9789004298767_018

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 289

EP - 306

JO - Grazer Philosophische Studien

JF - Grazer Philosophische Studien

SN - 0165-9227

IS - 1

ER -