Abstract
When we bring together certain plausible and compatible principles guiding the use of vague predicates the inclination to accept that vague predicates are tolerant is significantly weakened. As the principle of tolerance is a troublesome, paradox inducing principle, a theory giving a satisfactory account of the nature of vague predicates and accounting for the appeal of the sorites paradox, without recourse to the principle of tolerance is a worthy addition to the vagueness debate. The theory offered, Contextual Intolerance, draws considerably on Sainsbury’s (1996) thesis of the boundarylessness of vague concepts and on the contextualist theories of vagueness offered by Stewart Shapiro (2003, 2006) and Diana Raffman (1994).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 289-306 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Grazer Philosophische Studien |
Volume | 90 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 1 Jan 0201 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2015 |