Contribution of different mechanisms to compensation for energy restriction in the mouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Restriction of energy intake produces weight loss, but the rate of loss is seldom sustained. This is presumed to be a consequence of compensatory reductions in energy expenditure, although the exact contributions of different components to the energy budget remain uncertain. We examined the compensatory responses of mice to a 20% dietary restriction.

Research Methods and Procedures: We measured body mass, body fatness, body temperature, and the components of daily energy expenditure for 50 MF1 mice. Forty mice were then placed on a restricted diet at 80% of their ad libitum intake for 50 days. The remaining 10 mice continued to feed ad libitum. Ten days before the end of the restriction period, the same measurements were taken.

Results: There were no significant differences between the control and restricted groups in any parameters before restriction. During the restriction period, body mass increased in both the control and restricted groups, but at a slower rate in the restricted mice. The control group increased in both fat and fat free mass; however, although the restricted group increased fat to the same extent as the controls, fat free mass increased to a lesser extent. The contributions of the different components of the expended energy to compensate for the reduced energy intake were energy deposition, 2.2%; resting metabolic rate, 22.3%; and activity, 75.5%.

Discussion: Mice were able to compensate almost completely for the restricted energy intake that was achieved by altering the amount of energy required for each component of the energy budget except digestive efficiency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1548-1557
Number of pages10
JournalObesity Research
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • dietary restriction
  • energy expenditure
  • body composition
  • resting metabolic rate
  • male rhesus-monkeys
  • caloric restriction
  • metabolic-rate
  • Fischer-344 RATS
  • food restriction
  • body-composition
  • adaptive-changes
  • expenditure
  • weight

Cite this

Contribution of different mechanisms to compensation for energy restriction in the mouse. / Hambly, Catherine; Speakman, John R.

In: Obesity Research, Vol. 13, No. 9, 2005, p. 1548-1557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea3c26edb07d4b37a1ffb0b1a0d4ae58,
title = "Contribution of different mechanisms to compensation for energy restriction in the mouse",
abstract = "Objective: Restriction of energy intake produces weight loss, but the rate of loss is seldom sustained. This is presumed to be a consequence of compensatory reductions in energy expenditure, although the exact contributions of different components to the energy budget remain uncertain. We examined the compensatory responses of mice to a 20{\%} dietary restriction.Research Methods and Procedures: We measured body mass, body fatness, body temperature, and the components of daily energy expenditure for 50 MF1 mice. Forty mice were then placed on a restricted diet at 80{\%} of their ad libitum intake for 50 days. The remaining 10 mice continued to feed ad libitum. Ten days before the end of the restriction period, the same measurements were taken.Results: There were no significant differences between the control and restricted groups in any parameters before restriction. During the restriction period, body mass increased in both the control and restricted groups, but at a slower rate in the restricted mice. The control group increased in both fat and fat free mass; however, although the restricted group increased fat to the same extent as the controls, fat free mass increased to a lesser extent. The contributions of the different components of the expended energy to compensate for the reduced energy intake were energy deposition, 2.2{\%}; resting metabolic rate, 22.3{\%}; and activity, 75.5{\%}.Discussion: Mice were able to compensate almost completely for the restricted energy intake that was achieved by altering the amount of energy required for each component of the energy budget except digestive efficiency.",
keywords = "dietary restriction, energy expenditure, body composition, resting metabolic rate, male rhesus-monkeys, caloric restriction, metabolic-rate, Fischer-344 RATS, food restriction, body-composition, adaptive-changes, expenditure, weight",
author = "Catherine Hambly and Speakman, {John R}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1038/oby.2005.190",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1548--1557",
journal = "Obesity Research",
issn = "1071-7323",
publisher = "North American Association for the Study of Obesity",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contribution of different mechanisms to compensation for energy restriction in the mouse

AU - Hambly, Catherine

AU - Speakman, John R

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Objective: Restriction of energy intake produces weight loss, but the rate of loss is seldom sustained. This is presumed to be a consequence of compensatory reductions in energy expenditure, although the exact contributions of different components to the energy budget remain uncertain. We examined the compensatory responses of mice to a 20% dietary restriction.Research Methods and Procedures: We measured body mass, body fatness, body temperature, and the components of daily energy expenditure for 50 MF1 mice. Forty mice were then placed on a restricted diet at 80% of their ad libitum intake for 50 days. The remaining 10 mice continued to feed ad libitum. Ten days before the end of the restriction period, the same measurements were taken.Results: There were no significant differences between the control and restricted groups in any parameters before restriction. During the restriction period, body mass increased in both the control and restricted groups, but at a slower rate in the restricted mice. The control group increased in both fat and fat free mass; however, although the restricted group increased fat to the same extent as the controls, fat free mass increased to a lesser extent. The contributions of the different components of the expended energy to compensate for the reduced energy intake were energy deposition, 2.2%; resting metabolic rate, 22.3%; and activity, 75.5%.Discussion: Mice were able to compensate almost completely for the restricted energy intake that was achieved by altering the amount of energy required for each component of the energy budget except digestive efficiency.

AB - Objective: Restriction of energy intake produces weight loss, but the rate of loss is seldom sustained. This is presumed to be a consequence of compensatory reductions in energy expenditure, although the exact contributions of different components to the energy budget remain uncertain. We examined the compensatory responses of mice to a 20% dietary restriction.Research Methods and Procedures: We measured body mass, body fatness, body temperature, and the components of daily energy expenditure for 50 MF1 mice. Forty mice were then placed on a restricted diet at 80% of their ad libitum intake for 50 days. The remaining 10 mice continued to feed ad libitum. Ten days before the end of the restriction period, the same measurements were taken.Results: There were no significant differences between the control and restricted groups in any parameters before restriction. During the restriction period, body mass increased in both the control and restricted groups, but at a slower rate in the restricted mice. The control group increased in both fat and fat free mass; however, although the restricted group increased fat to the same extent as the controls, fat free mass increased to a lesser extent. The contributions of the different components of the expended energy to compensate for the reduced energy intake were energy deposition, 2.2%; resting metabolic rate, 22.3%; and activity, 75.5%.Discussion: Mice were able to compensate almost completely for the restricted energy intake that was achieved by altering the amount of energy required for each component of the energy budget except digestive efficiency.

KW - dietary restriction

KW - energy expenditure

KW - body composition

KW - resting metabolic rate

KW - male rhesus-monkeys

KW - caloric restriction

KW - metabolic-rate

KW - Fischer-344 RATS

KW - food restriction

KW - body-composition

KW - adaptive-changes

KW - expenditure

KW - weight

U2 - 10.1038/oby.2005.190

DO - 10.1038/oby.2005.190

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1548

EP - 1557

JO - Obesity Research

JF - Obesity Research

SN - 1071-7323

IS - 9

ER -