Coordinated Ethnographic Peace Research: Assessing Complex Peace Interventions Writ Large and Over Time

Gearoid Millar* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Post-conflict interventions are often promoted for their presumed positive long-term influence on peace and justice. Concerns linger, however, that they can also let the state off the hook by replacing, and thereby undermining, its capacity over time. Unfortunately, scholarly research assessing the long-term influence of post-conflict interventions is rare, and practitioner evaluations are primarily short-term processes regarding individual, temporally bounded projects. This paper explores the potential of, and challenges to, coordinated ethnographic peace research for assessing the longer-term influences of post-conflict interventions writ large on state capacity. A key challenge is identified in the complex interactions between projects implemented a) in parallel, b) at different scales, and/or c) in different time periods; which together mean that any influence observed may be overdetermined and hard to link back to a specific peace or justice project. But, as will be argued, coordinated ethnographic peace research provides hope of overcoming these challenges.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-148
Number of pages15
JournalPeacebuilding
Volume9
Issue number2
Early online date8 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Keywords

  • Ethnographic Peace Research
  • Peacebuilding
  • Transitional Justice
  • Evaluation
  • State Capacity
  • Complexity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coordinated Ethnographic Peace Research: Assessing Complex Peace Interventions Writ Large and Over Time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this