Coordination and Collective Performance: Cooperative Goals Boost Interpersonal Synchrony and Task Outcomes

Jamie S. Allsop, Tomas Vaitkus, Dannette Marie, Lynden K. Miles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Whether it be a rugby team or a rescue crew, ensuring peak group performance is a primary goal during collective activities. In reality however, groups often suffer from productivity losses that can lead to less than optimal outputs. Where researchers have focused on this problem, inefficiencies in the way team members coordinate their efforts has been identified as one potent source of productivity decrements. Here we set out to explore whether performance on a simple object movement task is shaped by the spontaneous emergence of interpersonally coordinated behavior. Forty-six pairs of participants were instructed to either compete or cooperate in order to empty a container of approximately 100 small plastic balls as quickly and accurately as possible. Each trial was recorded to video and a frame-differencing approach was employed to estimate between-person coordination. The results revealed that cooperative pairs coordinated to a greater extent than their competitive counterparts. Furthermore, coordination, as well as movement regularity were positively related to accuracy, an effect that was most prominent when the task was structured such that opportunities to coordinate were restricted. These findings are discussed with regard to contemporary theories of coordination and collective performance.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1462
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume7
Early online date12 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Football
Plastics
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • interpersonal synchrony
  • cooperation
  • competition
  • productivity
  • teamwork
  • coordination
  • groups

Cite this

Coordination and Collective Performance : Cooperative Goals Boost Interpersonal Synchrony and Task Outcomes. / Allsop, Jamie S.; Vaitkus, Tomas ; Marie, Dannette; Miles, Lynden K.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, 1462, 27.09.2016, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Allsop, Jamie S. ; Vaitkus, Tomas ; Marie, Dannette ; Miles, Lynden K. / Coordination and Collective Performance : Cooperative Goals Boost Interpersonal Synchrony and Task Outcomes. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 7. pp. 1-11.
@article{55fe14f04f0c411d8a43508aa50af5f0,
title = "Coordination and Collective Performance: Cooperative Goals Boost Interpersonal Synchrony and Task Outcomes",
abstract = "Whether it be a rugby team or a rescue crew, ensuring peak group performance is a primary goal during collective activities. In reality however, groups often suffer from productivity losses that can lead to less than optimal outputs. Where researchers have focused on this problem, inefficiencies in the way team members coordinate their efforts has been identified as one potent source of productivity decrements. Here we set out to explore whether performance on a simple object movement task is shaped by the spontaneous emergence of interpersonally coordinated behavior. Forty-six pairs of participants were instructed to either compete or cooperate in order to empty a container of approximately 100 small plastic balls as quickly and accurately as possible. Each trial was recorded to video and a frame-differencing approach was employed to estimate between-person coordination. The results revealed that cooperative pairs coordinated to a greater extent than their competitive counterparts. Furthermore, coordination, as well as movement regularity were positively related to accuracy, an effect that was most prominent when the task was structured such that opportunities to coordinate were restricted. These findings are discussed with regard to contemporary theories of coordination and collective performance.",
keywords = "interpersonal synchrony, cooperation, competition, productivity, teamwork , coordination, groups",
author = "Allsop, {Jamie S.} and Tomas Vaitkus and Dannette Marie and Miles, {Lynden K.}",
note = "Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Cathy Macpherson and Hope Fawcett-Lipscombe with data collection and coding as well as Mike Richardson for generously sharing Matlab code and providing invaluable guidance. Supplementary Material The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coordination and Collective Performance

T2 - Cooperative Goals Boost Interpersonal Synchrony and Task Outcomes

AU - Allsop, Jamie S.

AU - Vaitkus, Tomas

AU - Marie, Dannette

AU - Miles, Lynden K.

N1 - Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Cathy Macpherson and Hope Fawcett-Lipscombe with data collection and coding as well as Mike Richardson for generously sharing Matlab code and providing invaluable guidance. Supplementary Material The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462

PY - 2016/9/27

Y1 - 2016/9/27

N2 - Whether it be a rugby team or a rescue crew, ensuring peak group performance is a primary goal during collective activities. In reality however, groups often suffer from productivity losses that can lead to less than optimal outputs. Where researchers have focused on this problem, inefficiencies in the way team members coordinate their efforts has been identified as one potent source of productivity decrements. Here we set out to explore whether performance on a simple object movement task is shaped by the spontaneous emergence of interpersonally coordinated behavior. Forty-six pairs of participants were instructed to either compete or cooperate in order to empty a container of approximately 100 small plastic balls as quickly and accurately as possible. Each trial was recorded to video and a frame-differencing approach was employed to estimate between-person coordination. The results revealed that cooperative pairs coordinated to a greater extent than their competitive counterparts. Furthermore, coordination, as well as movement regularity were positively related to accuracy, an effect that was most prominent when the task was structured such that opportunities to coordinate were restricted. These findings are discussed with regard to contemporary theories of coordination and collective performance.

AB - Whether it be a rugby team or a rescue crew, ensuring peak group performance is a primary goal during collective activities. In reality however, groups often suffer from productivity losses that can lead to less than optimal outputs. Where researchers have focused on this problem, inefficiencies in the way team members coordinate their efforts has been identified as one potent source of productivity decrements. Here we set out to explore whether performance on a simple object movement task is shaped by the spontaneous emergence of interpersonally coordinated behavior. Forty-six pairs of participants were instructed to either compete or cooperate in order to empty a container of approximately 100 small plastic balls as quickly and accurately as possible. Each trial was recorded to video and a frame-differencing approach was employed to estimate between-person coordination. The results revealed that cooperative pairs coordinated to a greater extent than their competitive counterparts. Furthermore, coordination, as well as movement regularity were positively related to accuracy, an effect that was most prominent when the task was structured such that opportunities to coordinate were restricted. These findings are discussed with regard to contemporary theories of coordination and collective performance.

KW - interpersonal synchrony

KW - cooperation

KW - competition

KW - productivity

KW - teamwork

KW - coordination

KW - groups

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01462

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 1462

ER -