Core competencies in teaching and training for doctors in Scotland

a review of the literature and stakeholder survey

Michael Ross, Claire Macrae, Jane Scott, L Renwick, Mandy Moffat, Gillian Needham, Hazel Scott, Ben Shippey, Catherine Jackson, Simon Edgar, Debbie Aitken, Phillip Evans, Stewart Irvine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The UK General Medical Council requires all registered doctors to be competent in all areas of their work, including teaching and training.
Aims: The current research sought consensus on core competencies for all consultants and GPs involved in teaching and training in Scotland.
Method: A draft list of 80 competencies was developed from the literature and made available as a survey to all consultants and GPs with teaching roles and all final year speciality trainees working in Scotland. Respondents rated the importance of each competency and provided free text comments.
Results: There were 1026 responses. Eighteen competencies were rated as “high priority”, and are recommended as a baseline for all doctors involved in teaching and training; 55 were rated as “medium priority”, and are recommended in relation to specific teaching and training roles; and 7 were rated as “low priority”. Free text responses suggested the topic was controversial and emotive, and emphasised the importance of further work to engage trainers.
Conclusions: The findings appeared to have face validity, and it was felt these could be used as the basis for developing a “Scottish Trainer Framework” for doctors and others involved in teaching and training in Scotland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)527-538
Number of pages12
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume36
Issue number6
Early online date6 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

stakeholder
Teaching
trainee
literature

Cite this

Core competencies in teaching and training for doctors in Scotland : a review of the literature and stakeholder survey. / Ross, Michael; Macrae, Claire; Scott, Jane; Renwick, L; Moffat, Mandy; Needham, Gillian; Scott, Hazel; Shippey, Ben; Jackson, Catherine; Edgar, Simon; Aitken, Debbie; Evans, Phillip; Irvine, Stewart .

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2014, p. 527-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ross, M, Macrae, C, Scott, J, Renwick, L, Moffat, M, Needham, G, Scott, H, Shippey, B, Jackson, C, Edgar, S, Aitken, D, Evans, P & Irvine, S 2014, 'Core competencies in teaching and training for doctors in Scotland: a review of the literature and stakeholder survey', Medical Teacher, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 527-538. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.907879
Ross, Michael ; Macrae, Claire ; Scott, Jane ; Renwick, L ; Moffat, Mandy ; Needham, Gillian ; Scott, Hazel ; Shippey, Ben ; Jackson, Catherine ; Edgar, Simon ; Aitken, Debbie ; Evans, Phillip ; Irvine, Stewart . / Core competencies in teaching and training for doctors in Scotland : a review of the literature and stakeholder survey. In: Medical Teacher. 2014 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 527-538.
@article{734f7419144c40c0929586edad51e7b6,
title = "Core competencies in teaching and training for doctors in Scotland: a review of the literature and stakeholder survey",
abstract = "Background: The UK General Medical Council requires all registered doctors to be competent in all areas of their work, including teaching and training.Aims: The current research sought consensus on core competencies for all consultants and GPs involved in teaching and training in Scotland.Method: A draft list of 80 competencies was developed from the literature and made available as a survey to all consultants and GPs with teaching roles and all final year speciality trainees working in Scotland. Respondents rated the importance of each competency and provided free text comments.Results: There were 1026 responses. Eighteen competencies were rated as “high priority”, and are recommended as a baseline for all doctors involved in teaching and training; 55 were rated as “medium priority”, and are recommended in relation to specific teaching and training roles; and 7 were rated as “low priority”. Free text responses suggested the topic was controversial and emotive, and emphasised the importance of further work to engage trainers.Conclusions: The findings appeared to have face validity, and it was felt these could be used as the basis for developing a “Scottish Trainer Framework” for doctors and others involved in teaching and training in Scotland.",
author = "Michael Ross and Claire Macrae and Jane Scott and L Renwick and Mandy Moffat and Gillian Needham and Hazel Scott and Ben Shippey and Catherine Jackson and Simon Edgar and Debbie Aitken and Phillip Evans and Stewart Irvine",
note = "Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank all those who have helped with the NES Faculty Development Project for Scotland for their support and collaboration. The authors are also very grateful to all those who gave feedback on the draft survey, and the many survey respondents who contributed their valuable time and experience",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2014.907879",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "527--538",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Core competencies in teaching and training for doctors in Scotland

T2 - a review of the literature and stakeholder survey

AU - Ross, Michael

AU - Macrae, Claire

AU - Scott, Jane

AU - Renwick, L

AU - Moffat, Mandy

AU - Needham, Gillian

AU - Scott, Hazel

AU - Shippey, Ben

AU - Jackson, Catherine

AU - Edgar, Simon

AU - Aitken, Debbie

AU - Evans, Phillip

AU - Irvine, Stewart

N1 - Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank all those who have helped with the NES Faculty Development Project for Scotland for their support and collaboration. The authors are also very grateful to all those who gave feedback on the draft survey, and the many survey respondents who contributed their valuable time and experience

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: The UK General Medical Council requires all registered doctors to be competent in all areas of their work, including teaching and training.Aims: The current research sought consensus on core competencies for all consultants and GPs involved in teaching and training in Scotland.Method: A draft list of 80 competencies was developed from the literature and made available as a survey to all consultants and GPs with teaching roles and all final year speciality trainees working in Scotland. Respondents rated the importance of each competency and provided free text comments.Results: There were 1026 responses. Eighteen competencies were rated as “high priority”, and are recommended as a baseline for all doctors involved in teaching and training; 55 were rated as “medium priority”, and are recommended in relation to specific teaching and training roles; and 7 were rated as “low priority”. Free text responses suggested the topic was controversial and emotive, and emphasised the importance of further work to engage trainers.Conclusions: The findings appeared to have face validity, and it was felt these could be used as the basis for developing a “Scottish Trainer Framework” for doctors and others involved in teaching and training in Scotland.

AB - Background: The UK General Medical Council requires all registered doctors to be competent in all areas of their work, including teaching and training.Aims: The current research sought consensus on core competencies for all consultants and GPs involved in teaching and training in Scotland.Method: A draft list of 80 competencies was developed from the literature and made available as a survey to all consultants and GPs with teaching roles and all final year speciality trainees working in Scotland. Respondents rated the importance of each competency and provided free text comments.Results: There were 1026 responses. Eighteen competencies were rated as “high priority”, and are recommended as a baseline for all doctors involved in teaching and training; 55 were rated as “medium priority”, and are recommended in relation to specific teaching and training roles; and 7 were rated as “low priority”. Free text responses suggested the topic was controversial and emotive, and emphasised the importance of further work to engage trainers.Conclusions: The findings appeared to have face validity, and it was felt these could be used as the basis for developing a “Scottish Trainer Framework” for doctors and others involved in teaching and training in Scotland.

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907879

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907879

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 527

EP - 538

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 6

ER -