Corporate accountability in relation to human rights: Have RIOs done enough?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the development of corporate human rights standards since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, better known as the Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. One of the important agendas for this Summit was human rights (apart from the climate change issue). This chapter provides a critical evaluation of institutional change in human rights guidelines and associated corporate (non) accountability in relation to human rights in line with the RIO summit. Based on a review of the media reports, archival documents and a case study, we argue that while there are a number of international organisations working towards the creation of corporate accountability in relation to human rights, there is limited real change in corporate action when faced with no government regulation. A radical (reform-based) approach, such as mandatory monitoring (compliance audit) and disclosure requirements is necessary to ensure corporate accountability in relation to human rights.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSustainability after Rio
EditorsDavid Crowther, Muhammad Azizul Islam
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Limited
Pages161-183
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-78560-444-7
ISBN (Print)978-1-78560-445-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameDevelopments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility
Volume8

Fingerprint

human rights
responsibility
institutional change
audit
UNO
climate change
monitoring
regulation
reform
evaluation

Cite this

Islam, M. A., Quayle, A., & Haque, S. (2015). Corporate accountability in relation to human rights: Have RIOs done enough? In D. Crowther, & M. A. Islam (Eds.), Sustainability after Rio (pp. 161-183). (Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility; Vol. 8). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320150000008008

Corporate accountability in relation to human rights : Have RIOs done enough? / Islam, Muhammad Azizul; Quayle, Annette; Haque, Shamima.

Sustainability after Rio. ed. / David Crowther; Muhammad Azizul Islam. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015. p. 161-183 (Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility; Vol. 8).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Islam, MA, Quayle, A & Haque, S 2015, Corporate accountability in relation to human rights: Have RIOs done enough? in D Crowther & MA Islam (eds), Sustainability after Rio. Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility, vol. 8, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320150000008008
Islam MA, Quayle A, Haque S. Corporate accountability in relation to human rights: Have RIOs done enough? In Crowther D, Islam MA, editors, Sustainability after Rio. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 2015. p. 161-183. (Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320150000008008
Islam, Muhammad Azizul ; Quayle, Annette ; Haque, Shamima. / Corporate accountability in relation to human rights : Have RIOs done enough?. Sustainability after Rio. editor / David Crowther ; Muhammad Azizul Islam. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015. pp. 161-183 (Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility).
@inbook{26371812fb3847d6ad6caf94e434ebd8,
title = "Corporate accountability in relation to human rights: Have RIOs done enough?",
abstract = "This chapter focuses on the development of corporate human rights standards since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, better known as the Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. One of the important agendas for this Summit was human rights (apart from the climate change issue). This chapter provides a critical evaluation of institutional change in human rights guidelines and associated corporate (non) accountability in relation to human rights in line with the RIO summit. Based on a review of the media reports, archival documents and a case study, we argue that while there are a number of international organisations working towards the creation of corporate accountability in relation to human rights, there is limited real change in corporate action when faced with no government regulation. A radical (reform-based) approach, such as mandatory monitoring (compliance audit) and disclosure requirements is necessary to ensure corporate accountability in relation to human rights.",
author = "Islam, {Muhammad Azizul} and Annette Quayle and Shamima Haque",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1108/S2043-052320150000008008",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-78560-445-4",
series = "Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Limited",
pages = "161--183",
editor = "David Crowther and Islam, {Muhammad Azizul}",
booktitle = "Sustainability after Rio",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Corporate accountability in relation to human rights

T2 - Have RIOs done enough?

AU - Islam, Muhammad Azizul

AU - Quayle, Annette

AU - Haque, Shamima

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This chapter focuses on the development of corporate human rights standards since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, better known as the Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. One of the important agendas for this Summit was human rights (apart from the climate change issue). This chapter provides a critical evaluation of institutional change in human rights guidelines and associated corporate (non) accountability in relation to human rights in line with the RIO summit. Based on a review of the media reports, archival documents and a case study, we argue that while there are a number of international organisations working towards the creation of corporate accountability in relation to human rights, there is limited real change in corporate action when faced with no government regulation. A radical (reform-based) approach, such as mandatory monitoring (compliance audit) and disclosure requirements is necessary to ensure corporate accountability in relation to human rights.

AB - This chapter focuses on the development of corporate human rights standards since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, better known as the Earth Summit was held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. One of the important agendas for this Summit was human rights (apart from the climate change issue). This chapter provides a critical evaluation of institutional change in human rights guidelines and associated corporate (non) accountability in relation to human rights in line with the RIO summit. Based on a review of the media reports, archival documents and a case study, we argue that while there are a number of international organisations working towards the creation of corporate accountability in relation to human rights, there is limited real change in corporate action when faced with no government regulation. A radical (reform-based) approach, such as mandatory monitoring (compliance audit) and disclosure requirements is necessary to ensure corporate accountability in relation to human rights.

U2 - 10.1108/S2043-052320150000008008

DO - 10.1108/S2043-052320150000008008

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-78560-445-4

T3 - Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility

SP - 161

EP - 183

BT - Sustainability after Rio

A2 - Crowther, David

A2 - Islam, Muhammad Azizul

PB - Emerald Group Publishing Limited

ER -