Cost and potential of carbon abatement from the UK perennial energy crop market

Peter Alexander, Dominic Moran, Mark D.A. Rounsevell, Jonathan Hillier, Pete Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biomass produced from perennial energy crops is expected to contribute to UK renewable energy targets, reducing the carbon intensity of energy production. The UK government has had incentive policies in place targeting both farmers and power plant investors to develop this market, but growth has been slower than anticipated. Market expansion requires the interaction of farmers growing these crops, with the construction of biomass power plants or other facilities to consume them. This study uses an agent-based model to investigate behaviour of the UK energy crop market and examines the cost of emission abatement that the market might provide. The model is run for various policy scenarios attempting to answer the following questions: Do existing policies for perennial energy crops provide a cost-effective mechanism in stimulating the market to achieve emissions abatement? What are the relative benefits of providing incentives to farmers or energy producers? What are the trade-offs between increased or decreased subsidy levels and the rate and level of market uptake, and hence carbon abatement? The results suggest that maintaining the energy crop scheme, which provides farmers' establishment grants, can increase both the emissions abatement potential and cost-effectiveness. A minimum carbon equivalent abatement cost is seen at intermediate subsidy levels for energy generation. This suggests that there is an optimum level that cost-effectively stimulates the market to achieve emissions reduction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-168
Number of pages13
JournalGlobal Change Biology. Bioenergy
Volume6
Issue number2
Early online date29 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

energy crop
energy crops
Crops
markets
Carbon
market
carbon
cost
Costs
Power plants
Biomass
farmers
power plants
subsidies
Cost effectiveness
incentive
power plant
energy
biomass power
abatement cost

Keywords

  • agent-based model
  • biomass
  • energy crops
  • greenhouse gas
  • land use
  • Miscanthus
  • renewable energy
  • short-rotation coppice

Cite this

Cost and potential of carbon abatement from the UK perennial energy crop market. / Alexander, Peter; Moran, Dominic; Rounsevell, Mark D.A.; Hillier, Jonathan; Smith, Pete.

In: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.03.2014, p. 156-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alexander, Peter ; Moran, Dominic ; Rounsevell, Mark D.A. ; Hillier, Jonathan ; Smith, Pete. / Cost and potential of carbon abatement from the UK perennial energy crop market. In: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy. 2014 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 156-168.
@article{f76779374d104a6eab512e1378e65d6a,
title = "Cost and potential of carbon abatement from the UK perennial energy crop market",
abstract = "Biomass produced from perennial energy crops is expected to contribute to UK renewable energy targets, reducing the carbon intensity of energy production. The UK government has had incentive policies in place targeting both farmers and power plant investors to develop this market, but growth has been slower than anticipated. Market expansion requires the interaction of farmers growing these crops, with the construction of biomass power plants or other facilities to consume them. This study uses an agent-based model to investigate behaviour of the UK energy crop market and examines the cost of emission abatement that the market might provide. The model is run for various policy scenarios attempting to answer the following questions: Do existing policies for perennial energy crops provide a cost-effective mechanism in stimulating the market to achieve emissions abatement? What are the relative benefits of providing incentives to farmers or energy producers? What are the trade-offs between increased or decreased subsidy levels and the rate and level of market uptake, and hence carbon abatement? The results suggest that maintaining the energy crop scheme, which provides farmers' establishment grants, can increase both the emissions abatement potential and cost-effectiveness. A minimum carbon equivalent abatement cost is seen at intermediate subsidy levels for energy generation. This suggests that there is an optimum level that cost-effectively stimulates the market to achieve emissions reduction.",
keywords = "agent-based model, biomass, energy crops, greenhouse gas, land use, Miscanthus, renewable energy, short-rotation coppice",
author = "Peter Alexander and Dominic Moran and Rounsevell, {Mark D.A.} and Jonathan Hillier and Pete Smith",
note = "he authors would like to thank Astley Hastings (University of Aberdeen), Gilla Sunnenberg and Andrew A Lovett (University of East Anglia), Matthew J Tallis (University of Portsmouth), Eric Casella (Forest Research) and Gail Taylor (University of Southampton) for providing the data sets used. The project contributes to the UKERC project: ‘Spatial analysis and mapping of energy crops in GB to 2050’. PS is a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award holder. The project made use of resources provided by the Edinburgh Compute and Data Facility (http://www.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/). We acknowledge the support of the Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division funding to SRUC.",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/gcbb.12148",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "156--168",
journal = "Global Change Biology. Bioenergy",
issn = "1757-1693",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost and potential of carbon abatement from the UK perennial energy crop market

AU - Alexander, Peter

AU - Moran, Dominic

AU - Rounsevell, Mark D.A.

AU - Hillier, Jonathan

AU - Smith, Pete

N1 - he authors would like to thank Astley Hastings (University of Aberdeen), Gilla Sunnenberg and Andrew A Lovett (University of East Anglia), Matthew J Tallis (University of Portsmouth), Eric Casella (Forest Research) and Gail Taylor (University of Southampton) for providing the data sets used. The project contributes to the UKERC project: ‘Spatial analysis and mapping of energy crops in GB to 2050’. PS is a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award holder. The project made use of resources provided by the Edinburgh Compute and Data Facility (http://www.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/). We acknowledge the support of the Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division funding to SRUC.

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - Biomass produced from perennial energy crops is expected to contribute to UK renewable energy targets, reducing the carbon intensity of energy production. The UK government has had incentive policies in place targeting both farmers and power plant investors to develop this market, but growth has been slower than anticipated. Market expansion requires the interaction of farmers growing these crops, with the construction of biomass power plants or other facilities to consume them. This study uses an agent-based model to investigate behaviour of the UK energy crop market and examines the cost of emission abatement that the market might provide. The model is run for various policy scenarios attempting to answer the following questions: Do existing policies for perennial energy crops provide a cost-effective mechanism in stimulating the market to achieve emissions abatement? What are the relative benefits of providing incentives to farmers or energy producers? What are the trade-offs between increased or decreased subsidy levels and the rate and level of market uptake, and hence carbon abatement? The results suggest that maintaining the energy crop scheme, which provides farmers' establishment grants, can increase both the emissions abatement potential and cost-effectiveness. A minimum carbon equivalent abatement cost is seen at intermediate subsidy levels for energy generation. This suggests that there is an optimum level that cost-effectively stimulates the market to achieve emissions reduction.

AB - Biomass produced from perennial energy crops is expected to contribute to UK renewable energy targets, reducing the carbon intensity of energy production. The UK government has had incentive policies in place targeting both farmers and power plant investors to develop this market, but growth has been slower than anticipated. Market expansion requires the interaction of farmers growing these crops, with the construction of biomass power plants or other facilities to consume them. This study uses an agent-based model to investigate behaviour of the UK energy crop market and examines the cost of emission abatement that the market might provide. The model is run for various policy scenarios attempting to answer the following questions: Do existing policies for perennial energy crops provide a cost-effective mechanism in stimulating the market to achieve emissions abatement? What are the relative benefits of providing incentives to farmers or energy producers? What are the trade-offs between increased or decreased subsidy levels and the rate and level of market uptake, and hence carbon abatement? The results suggest that maintaining the energy crop scheme, which provides farmers' establishment grants, can increase both the emissions abatement potential and cost-effectiveness. A minimum carbon equivalent abatement cost is seen at intermediate subsidy levels for energy generation. This suggests that there is an optimum level that cost-effectively stimulates the market to achieve emissions reduction.

KW - agent-based model

KW - biomass

KW - energy crops

KW - greenhouse gas

KW - land use

KW - Miscanthus

KW - renewable energy

KW - short-rotation coppice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888318779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcbb.12148

DO - 10.1111/gcbb.12148

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 156

EP - 168

JO - Global Change Biology. Bioenergy

JF - Global Change Biology. Bioenergy

SN - 1757-1693

IS - 2

ER -