Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland

G S Scotland, Paul McNamee, Sam Philip, A D Fleming, K A Goatman, G J Prescott, S Fonseca, P F Sharp, J A Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: National screening programmes for diabetic retinopathy using digital photography and multi-level manual grading systems are currently being implemented in the UK. Here, we assess the cost-effectiveness of replacing first level manual grading in the National Screening Programme in Scotland with an automated system developed to assess image quality and detect the presence of any retinopathy.

Methods: A decision tree model was developed and populated using sensitivity/specificity and cost data based on a study of 6722 patients in the Grampian region. Costs to the NHS, and the number of appropriate screening outcomes and true referable cases detected in 1 year were assessed.

Results: For the diabetic population of Scotland (approximately 160 000), with prevalence of referable retinopathy at 4% (6400 true cases), the automated strategy would be expected to identify 5560 cases (86.9%) and the manual strategy 5610 cases (87.7%). However, the automated system led to savings in grading and quality assurance costs to the NHS of 201 pound 600 per year. The additional cost per additional referable case detected (manual vs automated) totalled 4088 pound and the additional cost per additional appropriate screening outcome (manual vs automated) was 1990 pound.

Conclusions: Given that automated grading is less costly and of similar effectiveness, it is likely to be considered a cost-effective alternative to manual grading.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1518-1523
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume91
Issue number11
Early online date21 Jun 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

Keywords

  • adult
  • aged
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • decision trees
  • diabetic retinopathy
  • female
  • health care costs
  • humans
  • image interpretation, computer-assisted
  • male
  • mass screening
  • middle aged
  • program evaluation
  • Scotland
  • severity of illness index
  • state medicine

Cite this

Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland. / Scotland, G S; McNamee, Paul; Philip, Sam; Fleming, A D; Goatman, K A; Prescott, G J; Fonseca, S; Sharp, P F; Olson, J A.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 91, No. 11, 11.2007, p. 1518-1523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9aed617cdb649959d2104c1c194745c,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland",
abstract = "Aims: National screening programmes for diabetic retinopathy using digital photography and multi-level manual grading systems are currently being implemented in the UK. Here, we assess the cost-effectiveness of replacing first level manual grading in the National Screening Programme in Scotland with an automated system developed to assess image quality and detect the presence of any retinopathy.Methods: A decision tree model was developed and populated using sensitivity/specificity and cost data based on a study of 6722 patients in the Grampian region. Costs to the NHS, and the number of appropriate screening outcomes and true referable cases detected in 1 year were assessed.Results: For the diabetic population of Scotland (approximately 160 000), with prevalence of referable retinopathy at 4{\%} (6400 true cases), the automated strategy would be expected to identify 5560 cases (86.9{\%}) and the manual strategy 5610 cases (87.7{\%}). However, the automated system led to savings in grading and quality assurance costs to the NHS of 201 pound 600 per year. The additional cost per additional referable case detected (manual vs automated) totalled 4088 pound and the additional cost per additional appropriate screening outcome (manual vs automated) was 1990 pound.Conclusions: Given that automated grading is less costly and of similar effectiveness, it is likely to be considered a cost-effective alternative to manual grading.",
keywords = "adult, aged, cost-benefit analysis, decision trees, diabetic retinopathy, female, health care costs, humans, image interpretation, computer-assisted, male, mass screening, middle aged, program evaluation, Scotland, severity of illness index, state medicine",
author = "Scotland, {G S} and Paul McNamee and Sam Philip and Fleming, {A D} and Goatman, {K A} and Prescott, {G J} and S Fonseca and Sharp, {P F} and Olson, {J A}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1136/bjo.2007.120972",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "1518--1523",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of implementing automated grading within the national screening programme for diabetic retinopathy in Scotland

AU - Scotland, G S

AU - McNamee, Paul

AU - Philip, Sam

AU - Fleming, A D

AU - Goatman, K A

AU - Prescott, G J

AU - Fonseca, S

AU - Sharp, P F

AU - Olson, J A

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Aims: National screening programmes for diabetic retinopathy using digital photography and multi-level manual grading systems are currently being implemented in the UK. Here, we assess the cost-effectiveness of replacing first level manual grading in the National Screening Programme in Scotland with an automated system developed to assess image quality and detect the presence of any retinopathy.Methods: A decision tree model was developed and populated using sensitivity/specificity and cost data based on a study of 6722 patients in the Grampian region. Costs to the NHS, and the number of appropriate screening outcomes and true referable cases detected in 1 year were assessed.Results: For the diabetic population of Scotland (approximately 160 000), with prevalence of referable retinopathy at 4% (6400 true cases), the automated strategy would be expected to identify 5560 cases (86.9%) and the manual strategy 5610 cases (87.7%). However, the automated system led to savings in grading and quality assurance costs to the NHS of 201 pound 600 per year. The additional cost per additional referable case detected (manual vs automated) totalled 4088 pound and the additional cost per additional appropriate screening outcome (manual vs automated) was 1990 pound.Conclusions: Given that automated grading is less costly and of similar effectiveness, it is likely to be considered a cost-effective alternative to manual grading.

AB - Aims: National screening programmes for diabetic retinopathy using digital photography and multi-level manual grading systems are currently being implemented in the UK. Here, we assess the cost-effectiveness of replacing first level manual grading in the National Screening Programme in Scotland with an automated system developed to assess image quality and detect the presence of any retinopathy.Methods: A decision tree model was developed and populated using sensitivity/specificity and cost data based on a study of 6722 patients in the Grampian region. Costs to the NHS, and the number of appropriate screening outcomes and true referable cases detected in 1 year were assessed.Results: For the diabetic population of Scotland (approximately 160 000), with prevalence of referable retinopathy at 4% (6400 true cases), the automated strategy would be expected to identify 5560 cases (86.9%) and the manual strategy 5610 cases (87.7%). However, the automated system led to savings in grading and quality assurance costs to the NHS of 201 pound 600 per year. The additional cost per additional referable case detected (manual vs automated) totalled 4088 pound and the additional cost per additional appropriate screening outcome (manual vs automated) was 1990 pound.Conclusions: Given that automated grading is less costly and of similar effectiveness, it is likely to be considered a cost-effective alternative to manual grading.

KW - adult

KW - aged

KW - cost-benefit analysis

KW - decision trees

KW - diabetic retinopathy

KW - female

KW - health care costs

KW - humans

KW - image interpretation, computer-assisted

KW - male

KW - mass screening

KW - middle aged

KW - program evaluation

KW - Scotland

KW - severity of illness index

KW - state medicine

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2007.120972

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2007.120972

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 1518

EP - 1523

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 11

ER -