Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland

Mark Petticrew, Sean Semple, Shona Hilton, Kaen S Creely, Douglas Eadie, Deborah Ritchie, Catherine Ferrell, Yvette Christopher, Fintan Hurley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: A ban on smoking in wholly or substantially enclosed public places has been in place in Scotland since 26(th) March 2006. The impact of this legislation is currently being evaluated in seven studies, three of which involve direct observation of smoking in bars and other enclosed public places. While the ethical issues around covert observation have been widely discussed there is little practical guidance on the conduct of such research. A workshop was therefore convened to identify practical lessons learned so far from the Scottish evaluation.

Methods: We convened a workshop involving researchers from the three studies which used direct observation. In addition, one of the fieldwork managers collected written feedback on the fieldwork, identifying problems that arose in the field and some solutions.

Results: There were four main themes identified: (i) the difficulty of achieving and maintaining concealment; (ii) the experience of being an observer; ( iii) the risk of bias in the observations and (iv) issues around training and recruitment. These are discussed.

Conclusion: Collecting covert observational data poses unique practical challenges, in particular in relation to the health and safety of the researcher. The findings and solutions presented in this paper will be of value to researchers designing similar studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number204
Number of pages8
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2007

Keywords

  • social desirability bias
  • cigarette-smoking
  • impact
  • work

Cite this

Covert observation in practice : lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland. / Petticrew, Mark; Semple, Sean; Hilton, Shona; Creely, Kaen S; Eadie, Douglas; Ritchie, Deborah; Ferrell, Catherine; Christopher, Yvette; Hurley, Fintan.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 7, 204, 10.08.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Petticrew, M, Semple, S, Hilton, S, Creely, KS, Eadie, D, Ritchie, D, Ferrell, C, Christopher, Y & Hurley, F 2007, 'Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland', BMC Public Health, vol. 7, 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-204
Petticrew, Mark ; Semple, Sean ; Hilton, Shona ; Creely, Kaen S ; Eadie, Douglas ; Ritchie, Deborah ; Ferrell, Catherine ; Christopher, Yvette ; Hurley, Fintan. / Covert observation in practice : lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland. In: BMC Public Health. 2007 ; Vol. 7.
@article{25943a2d91704f5aa9fa67a53f54cb9a,
title = "Covert observation in practice: lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland",
abstract = "Background: A ban on smoking in wholly or substantially enclosed public places has been in place in Scotland since 26(th) March 2006. The impact of this legislation is currently being evaluated in seven studies, three of which involve direct observation of smoking in bars and other enclosed public places. While the ethical issues around covert observation have been widely discussed there is little practical guidance on the conduct of such research. A workshop was therefore convened to identify practical lessons learned so far from the Scottish evaluation.Methods: We convened a workshop involving researchers from the three studies which used direct observation. In addition, one of the fieldwork managers collected written feedback on the fieldwork, identifying problems that arose in the field and some solutions.Results: There were four main themes identified: (i) the difficulty of achieving and maintaining concealment; (ii) the experience of being an observer; ( iii) the risk of bias in the observations and (iv) issues around training and recruitment. These are discussed.Conclusion: Collecting covert observational data poses unique practical challenges, in particular in relation to the health and safety of the researcher. The findings and solutions presented in this paper will be of value to researchers designing similar studies.",
keywords = "social desirability bias, cigarette-smoking, impact, work",
author = "Mark Petticrew and Sean Semple and Shona Hilton and Creely, {Kaen S} and Douglas Eadie and Deborah Ritchie and Catherine Ferrell and Yvette Christopher and Fintan Hurley",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-7-204",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Covert observation in practice

T2 - lessons from the evaluation of the prohibition of smoking in public places in Scotland

AU - Petticrew, Mark

AU - Semple, Sean

AU - Hilton, Shona

AU - Creely, Kaen S

AU - Eadie, Douglas

AU - Ritchie, Deborah

AU - Ferrell, Catherine

AU - Christopher, Yvette

AU - Hurley, Fintan

PY - 2007/8/10

Y1 - 2007/8/10

N2 - Background: A ban on smoking in wholly or substantially enclosed public places has been in place in Scotland since 26(th) March 2006. The impact of this legislation is currently being evaluated in seven studies, three of which involve direct observation of smoking in bars and other enclosed public places. While the ethical issues around covert observation have been widely discussed there is little practical guidance on the conduct of such research. A workshop was therefore convened to identify practical lessons learned so far from the Scottish evaluation.Methods: We convened a workshop involving researchers from the three studies which used direct observation. In addition, one of the fieldwork managers collected written feedback on the fieldwork, identifying problems that arose in the field and some solutions.Results: There were four main themes identified: (i) the difficulty of achieving and maintaining concealment; (ii) the experience of being an observer; ( iii) the risk of bias in the observations and (iv) issues around training and recruitment. These are discussed.Conclusion: Collecting covert observational data poses unique practical challenges, in particular in relation to the health and safety of the researcher. The findings and solutions presented in this paper will be of value to researchers designing similar studies.

AB - Background: A ban on smoking in wholly or substantially enclosed public places has been in place in Scotland since 26(th) March 2006. The impact of this legislation is currently being evaluated in seven studies, three of which involve direct observation of smoking in bars and other enclosed public places. While the ethical issues around covert observation have been widely discussed there is little practical guidance on the conduct of such research. A workshop was therefore convened to identify practical lessons learned so far from the Scottish evaluation.Methods: We convened a workshop involving researchers from the three studies which used direct observation. In addition, one of the fieldwork managers collected written feedback on the fieldwork, identifying problems that arose in the field and some solutions.Results: There were four main themes identified: (i) the difficulty of achieving and maintaining concealment; (ii) the experience of being an observer; ( iii) the risk of bias in the observations and (iv) issues around training and recruitment. These are discussed.Conclusion: Collecting covert observational data poses unique practical challenges, in particular in relation to the health and safety of the researcher. The findings and solutions presented in this paper will be of value to researchers designing similar studies.

KW - social desirability bias

KW - cigarette-smoking

KW - impact

KW - work

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-7-204

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-7-204

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

M1 - 204

ER -