TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit
T2 - prospective analysis of data from 27 countries
AU - Kahan, Brennan C.
AU - Koulenti, Desponia
AU - Arvaniti, Kostoula
AU - Beavis, Vanessa
AU - Campbell, Douglas
AU - Chan, Matthew
AU - Moreno, Rui
AU - Pearse, Rupert M.
AU - The International Surgical Outcomes Study group
AU - Forget, Patrice
N1 - Acknowledgements
This was an investigator initiated study funded by Nestle Health Sciences through an unrestricted research grant, and by a National Institute for Health Research (UK) Professorship held by RP. The study was sponsored by Queen Mary University of London. ISOS investigators were entirely responsible for study design, conduct, and data analysis. The authors had full data access and were solely responsible for data interpretation, drafting and critical revision of the manuscript, and the decision to submit for publication.
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Purpose: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there is a need to define optimal levels of perioperative care. Our aim was to describe the relationship between the provision and use of critical care resources and postoperative mortality. Methods: Planned analysis of data collected during an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective in-patient surgery. We used risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models to evaluate the association between admission to critical care immediately after surgery and in-hospital mortality. We evaluated hospital-level associations between mortality and critical care admission immediately after surgery, critical care admission to treat life-threatening complications, and hospital provision of critical care beds. We evaluated the effect of national income using interaction tests. Results: 44,814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 countries were available for analysis. Death was more frequent amongst patients admitted directly to critical care after surgery (critical care: 103/4317 patients [2%], standard ward: 99/39,566 patients [0.3%]; adjusted OR 3.01 [2.10–5.21]; p < 0.001). This association may differ with national income (high income countries OR 2.50 vs. low and middle income countries OR 4.68; p = 0.07). At hospital level, there was no association between mortality and critical care admission directly after surgery (p = 0.26), critical care admission to treat complications (p = 0.33), or provision of critical care beds (p = 0.70). Findings of the hospital-level analyses were not affected by national income status. A sensitivity analysis including only high-risk patients yielded similar findings. Conclusions: We did not identify any survival benefit from critical care admission following surgery.
AB - Purpose: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there is a need to define optimal levels of perioperative care. Our aim was to describe the relationship between the provision and use of critical care resources and postoperative mortality. Methods: Planned analysis of data collected during an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective in-patient surgery. We used risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models to evaluate the association between admission to critical care immediately after surgery and in-hospital mortality. We evaluated hospital-level associations between mortality and critical care admission immediately after surgery, critical care admission to treat life-threatening complications, and hospital provision of critical care beds. We evaluated the effect of national income using interaction tests. Results: 44,814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 countries were available for analysis. Death was more frequent amongst patients admitted directly to critical care after surgery (critical care: 103/4317 patients [2%], standard ward: 99/39,566 patients [0.3%]; adjusted OR 3.01 [2.10–5.21]; p < 0.001). This association may differ with national income (high income countries OR 2.50 vs. low and middle income countries OR 4.68; p = 0.07). At hospital level, there was no association between mortality and critical care admission directly after surgery (p = 0.26), critical care admission to treat complications (p = 0.33), or provision of critical care beds (p = 0.70). Findings of the hospital-level analyses were not affected by national income status. A sensitivity analysis including only high-risk patients yielded similar findings. Conclusions: We did not identify any survival benefit from critical care admission following surgery.
KW - Critical care/utilisation
KW - Postoperative care/methods
KW - Postoperative care/statistics and numerical data
KW - Surgical procedures, operative/mortality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018845020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-016-4633-8
DO - 10.1007/s00134-016-4633-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 28439646
AN - SCOPUS:85018845020
VL - 43
SP - 971
EP - 979
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
SN - 0342-4642
IS - 7
ER -