Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching

David White, A. Mike Burton, Richard I. Kemp, Rob Jenkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Summary: Psychological research shows that humans can not reliably match unfamiliar faces. This presents a practical problem, because identity verification processes in a variety of occupational settings depend on people to perform these tasks reliably. In this context, it is surprising that very few studies have attempted to improve human performance. Here, we investigate whether distributing face matching tasks across groups of individuals might help to solve this problem. Across four studies, we measure the accuracy of the 'crowd' on a standard test of face matching ability and find that aggregating individual responses produces substantial gains in matching accuracy. We discuss the practical implications of this result and also suggest ways in which this approach might be used to improve our understanding of face perception more generally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)769-777
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Psychology
Research
Crowds
Facial Recognition
Psychological Research
Face Perception
Summary

Cite this

White, D., Burton, A. M., Kemp, R. I., & Jenkins, R. (2013). Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(6), 769-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2971

Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching. / White, David; Burton, A. Mike; Kemp, Richard I.; Jenkins, Rob.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 6, 01.11.2013, p. 769-777.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, D, Burton, AM, Kemp, RI & Jenkins, R 2013, 'Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching', Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 769-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2971
White D, Burton AM, Kemp RI, Jenkins R. Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2013 Nov 1;27(6):769-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2971
White, David ; Burton, A. Mike ; Kemp, Richard I. ; Jenkins, Rob. / Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 769-777.
@article{f1188a09d64844ddbd6436499f63c44c,
title = "Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching",
abstract = "Summary: Psychological research shows that humans can not reliably match unfamiliar faces. This presents a practical problem, because identity verification processes in a variety of occupational settings depend on people to perform these tasks reliably. In this context, it is surprising that very few studies have attempted to improve human performance. Here, we investigate whether distributing face matching tasks across groups of individuals might help to solve this problem. Across four studies, we measure the accuracy of the 'crowd' on a standard test of face matching ability and find that aggregating individual responses produces substantial gains in matching accuracy. We discuss the practical implications of this result and also suggest ways in which this approach might be used to improve our understanding of face perception more generally.",
author = "David White and Burton, {A. Mike} and Kemp, {Richard I.} and Rob Jenkins",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acp.2971",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "769--777",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crowd effects in unfamiliar face matching

AU - White, David

AU - Burton, A. Mike

AU - Kemp, Richard I.

AU - Jenkins, Rob

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Summary: Psychological research shows that humans can not reliably match unfamiliar faces. This presents a practical problem, because identity verification processes in a variety of occupational settings depend on people to perform these tasks reliably. In this context, it is surprising that very few studies have attempted to improve human performance. Here, we investigate whether distributing face matching tasks across groups of individuals might help to solve this problem. Across four studies, we measure the accuracy of the 'crowd' on a standard test of face matching ability and find that aggregating individual responses produces substantial gains in matching accuracy. We discuss the practical implications of this result and also suggest ways in which this approach might be used to improve our understanding of face perception more generally.

AB - Summary: Psychological research shows that humans can not reliably match unfamiliar faces. This presents a practical problem, because identity verification processes in a variety of occupational settings depend on people to perform these tasks reliably. In this context, it is surprising that very few studies have attempted to improve human performance. Here, we investigate whether distributing face matching tasks across groups of individuals might help to solve this problem. Across four studies, we measure the accuracy of the 'crowd' on a standard test of face matching ability and find that aggregating individual responses produces substantial gains in matching accuracy. We discuss the practical implications of this result and also suggest ways in which this approach might be used to improve our understanding of face perception more generally.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888332318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acp.2971

DO - 10.1002/acp.2971

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84888332318

VL - 27

SP - 769

EP - 777

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 6

ER -