Abstract
A well-documented human tendency is to compare outcomes with others,
trying to outperform them. These tendencies vary across cultures and
among different individuals in a given society. To understand the implications
of such diversity in status considerations on wages, contracts,
sorting and output we use a standard principal agent framework in which
firms consist of two workers and a principal. We find that, in equilibrium,
firms mix workers with different status concerns to enhance ‘cultural
trade’. Although workers may have the same productivity, equilibrium will
generate a dispersion in (expected) wages, and workers with status concerns
will have more high-powered incentives, work more and earn more
than workers who do not care about status. Finally, we find that a more
diverse workforce can increase the total output of the economy. This
increase in output is a result of the higher effort exerted by the status
minded workers that offsets the reduction in effort by those who do not
care about status.
trying to outperform them. These tendencies vary across cultures and
among different individuals in a given society. To understand the implications
of such diversity in status considerations on wages, contracts,
sorting and output we use a standard principal agent framework in which
firms consist of two workers and a principal. We find that, in equilibrium,
firms mix workers with different status concerns to enhance ‘cultural
trade’. Although workers may have the same productivity, equilibrium will
generate a dispersion in (expected) wages, and workers with status concerns
will have more high-powered incentives, work more and earn more
than workers who do not care about status. Finally, we find that a more
diverse workforce can increase the total output of the economy. This
increase in output is a result of the higher effort exerted by the status
minded workers that offsets the reduction in effort by those who do not
care about status.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 20-40 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Research in Labor Economics |
Volume | 24 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |