Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies

Greger Larson, Dolores R. Piperno, Robin G. Allaby, Michael D. Purugganan, Leif Andersson, Manuel Arroyo-Kalin, Loukas Barton, Cynthia Climer Vigueiraj, Tim Denham, Keith Dobney, Andrew N. Doust, Paul Gepts, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Kristen J. Gremillion, Leilani Lucas, Lewis Lukans, Fiona B. Marshall, Kenneth M. Olsen, J. Chris Pires, Peter J. RichersonRafael Rubio de Casas, Oris I. Sanjur, Mark G. Thomas, Dorian Q. Fuller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

218 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is difficult to overstate the cultural and biological impacts that the domestication of plants and animals has had on our species. Fundamental questions regarding where, when, and how many times domestication took place have been of primary interest within a wide range of academic disciplines. Within the last two decades, the advent of new archaeological and genetic techniques has revolutionized our understanding of the pattern and process of domestication and agricultural origins that led to our modern way of life. In the spring of 2011, 25 scholars with a central interest in domestication representing the fields of genetics, archaeobotany, zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology, and archaeology met at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center to discuss recent domestication research progress and identify challenges for the future. In this introduction to the resulting Special Feature, we present the state of the art in the field by discussing what is known about the spatial and temporal patterns of domestication, and controversies surrounding the speed, intentionality, and evolutionary aspects of the domestication process. We then highlight three key challenges for future research. We conclude by arguing that although recent progress has been impressive, the next decade will yield even more substantial insights not only into how domestication took place, but also when and where it did, and where and why it did not.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6139-6146
Number of pages8
JournalPNAS
Volume111
Issue number17
Early online date22 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Apr 2014

Fingerprint

way of life
archaeology
animal

Keywords

  • evolution
  • selection
  • agriculture
  • human ecology
  • human history

Cite this

Larson, G., Piperno, D. R., Allaby, R. G., Purugganan, M. D., Andersson, L., Arroyo-Kalin, M., ... Fuller, D. Q. (2014). Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. PNAS, 111(17), 6139-6146. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323964111

Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. / Larson, Greger; Piperno, Dolores R.; Allaby, Robin G.; Purugganan, Michael D.; Andersson, Leif; Arroyo-Kalin, Manuel; Barton, Loukas; Climer Vigueiraj, Cynthia; Denham, Tim; Dobney, Keith; Doust, Andrew N.; Gepts, Paul; Gilbert, M. Thomas P.; Gremillion, Kristen J.; Lucas, Leilani; Lukans, Lewis; Marshall, Fiona B.; Olsen, Kenneth M.; Pires, J. Chris; Richerson, Peter J.; Rubio de Casas, Rafael; Sanjur, Oris I.; Thomas, Mark G.; Fuller, Dorian Q.

In: PNAS, Vol. 111, No. 17, 29.04.2014, p. 6139-6146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Larson, G, Piperno, DR, Allaby, RG, Purugganan, MD, Andersson, L, Arroyo-Kalin, M, Barton, L, Climer Vigueiraj, C, Denham, T, Dobney, K, Doust, AN, Gepts, P, Gilbert, MTP, Gremillion, KJ, Lucas, L, Lukans, L, Marshall, FB, Olsen, KM, Pires, JC, Richerson, PJ, Rubio de Casas, R, Sanjur, OI, Thomas, MG & Fuller, DQ 2014, 'Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies', PNAS, vol. 111, no. 17, pp. 6139-6146. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323964111
Larson G, Piperno DR, Allaby RG, Purugganan MD, Andersson L, Arroyo-Kalin M et al. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. PNAS. 2014 Apr 29;111(17):6139-6146. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323964111
Larson, Greger ; Piperno, Dolores R. ; Allaby, Robin G. ; Purugganan, Michael D. ; Andersson, Leif ; Arroyo-Kalin, Manuel ; Barton, Loukas ; Climer Vigueiraj, Cynthia ; Denham, Tim ; Dobney, Keith ; Doust, Andrew N. ; Gepts, Paul ; Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ; Gremillion, Kristen J. ; Lucas, Leilani ; Lukans, Lewis ; Marshall, Fiona B. ; Olsen, Kenneth M. ; Pires, J. Chris ; Richerson, Peter J. ; Rubio de Casas, Rafael ; Sanjur, Oris I. ; Thomas, Mark G. ; Fuller, Dorian Q. / Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. In: PNAS. 2014 ; Vol. 111, No. 17. pp. 6139-6146.
@article{f3d0ca3ebd824b39ae7d39853fbc1c0c,
title = "Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies",
abstract = "It is difficult to overstate the cultural and biological impacts that the domestication of plants and animals has had on our species. Fundamental questions regarding where, when, and how many times domestication took place have been of primary interest within a wide range of academic disciplines. Within the last two decades, the advent of new archaeological and genetic techniques has revolutionized our understanding of the pattern and process of domestication and agricultural origins that led to our modern way of life. In the spring of 2011, 25 scholars with a central interest in domestication representing the fields of genetics, archaeobotany, zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology, and archaeology met at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center to discuss recent domestication research progress and identify challenges for the future. In this introduction to the resulting Special Feature, we present the state of the art in the field by discussing what is known about the spatial and temporal patterns of domestication, and controversies surrounding the speed, intentionality, and evolutionary aspects of the domestication process. We then highlight three key challenges for future research. We conclude by arguing that although recent progress has been impressive, the next decade will yield even more substantial insights not only into how domestication took place, but also when and where it did, and where and why it did not.",
keywords = "evolution , selection , agriculture , human ecology , human history",
author = "Greger Larson and Piperno, {Dolores R.} and Allaby, {Robin G.} and Purugganan, {Michael D.} and Leif Andersson and Manuel Arroyo-Kalin and Loukas Barton and {Climer Vigueiraj}, Cynthia and Tim Denham and Keith Dobney and Doust, {Andrew N.} and Paul Gepts and Gilbert, {M. Thomas P.} and Gremillion, {Kristen J.} and Leilani Lucas and Lewis Lukans and Marshall, {Fiona B.} and Olsen, {Kenneth M.} and Pires, {J. Chris} and Richerson, {Peter J.} and {Rubio de Casas}, Rafael and Sanjur, {Oris I.} and Thomas, {Mark G.} and Fuller, {Dorian Q.}",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1323964111",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "6139--6146",
journal = "PNAS",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "NATL ACAD SCIENCES",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies

AU - Larson, Greger

AU - Piperno, Dolores R.

AU - Allaby, Robin G.

AU - Purugganan, Michael D.

AU - Andersson, Leif

AU - Arroyo-Kalin, Manuel

AU - Barton, Loukas

AU - Climer Vigueiraj, Cynthia

AU - Denham, Tim

AU - Dobney, Keith

AU - Doust, Andrew N.

AU - Gepts, Paul

AU - Gilbert, M. Thomas P.

AU - Gremillion, Kristen J.

AU - Lucas, Leilani

AU - Lukans, Lewis

AU - Marshall, Fiona B.

AU - Olsen, Kenneth M.

AU - Pires, J. Chris

AU - Richerson, Peter J.

AU - Rubio de Casas, Rafael

AU - Sanjur, Oris I.

AU - Thomas, Mark G.

AU - Fuller, Dorian Q.

PY - 2014/4/29

Y1 - 2014/4/29

N2 - It is difficult to overstate the cultural and biological impacts that the domestication of plants and animals has had on our species. Fundamental questions regarding where, when, and how many times domestication took place have been of primary interest within a wide range of academic disciplines. Within the last two decades, the advent of new archaeological and genetic techniques has revolutionized our understanding of the pattern and process of domestication and agricultural origins that led to our modern way of life. In the spring of 2011, 25 scholars with a central interest in domestication representing the fields of genetics, archaeobotany, zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology, and archaeology met at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center to discuss recent domestication research progress and identify challenges for the future. In this introduction to the resulting Special Feature, we present the state of the art in the field by discussing what is known about the spatial and temporal patterns of domestication, and controversies surrounding the speed, intentionality, and evolutionary aspects of the domestication process. We then highlight three key challenges for future research. We conclude by arguing that although recent progress has been impressive, the next decade will yield even more substantial insights not only into how domestication took place, but also when and where it did, and where and why it did not.

AB - It is difficult to overstate the cultural and biological impacts that the domestication of plants and animals has had on our species. Fundamental questions regarding where, when, and how many times domestication took place have been of primary interest within a wide range of academic disciplines. Within the last two decades, the advent of new archaeological and genetic techniques has revolutionized our understanding of the pattern and process of domestication and agricultural origins that led to our modern way of life. In the spring of 2011, 25 scholars with a central interest in domestication representing the fields of genetics, archaeobotany, zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology, and archaeology met at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center to discuss recent domestication research progress and identify challenges for the future. In this introduction to the resulting Special Feature, we present the state of the art in the field by discussing what is known about the spatial and temporal patterns of domestication, and controversies surrounding the speed, intentionality, and evolutionary aspects of the domestication process. We then highlight three key challenges for future research. We conclude by arguing that although recent progress has been impressive, the next decade will yield even more substantial insights not only into how domestication took place, but also when and where it did, and where and why it did not.

KW - evolution

KW - selection

KW - agriculture

KW - human ecology

KW - human history

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1323964111

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1323964111

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 6139

EP - 6146

JO - PNAS

JF - PNAS

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 17

ER -