Dealing with Diversity in International Law

David Galbreath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The contradiction between the principles of state sovereignty and national self-determination has been a constant theme in international law. Here we see several approaches to this theme. First, we engage with the underlying questions of self-determination in the context of state-minority relations. Second, we address the relationship between international law and minority rights. In particular, the essay reviews the changing nature of self-determination as we move away from the post-colonial period. Finally, we review the relationship between self-determination and state sovereignty. This relationship between the two principles is further complicated since self-determination both leads to and violates state sovereignty. The essay finds that often the role of international law is over-estimated in its consideration of legal enforcement. Specifically, the essay concludes that we must maintain a firm grasp on the international 'politics' of self-determination in order to truly understand the changing nature of the international system and its impact on minority rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)539-550
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Human Rights
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

self-determination
international law
sovereignty
minority rights
national self-determination
International Politics
international system
minority

Cite this

Dealing with Diversity in International Law. / Galbreath, David.

In: International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 9, No. 4, 12.2005, p. 539-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Galbreath, David. / Dealing with Diversity in International Law. In: International Journal of Human Rights. 2005 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 539-550.
@article{970bbd0f26ff47bea8d5faa609049102,
title = "Dealing with Diversity in International Law",
abstract = "The contradiction between the principles of state sovereignty and national self-determination has been a constant theme in international law. Here we see several approaches to this theme. First, we engage with the underlying questions of self-determination in the context of state-minority relations. Second, we address the relationship between international law and minority rights. In particular, the essay reviews the changing nature of self-determination as we move away from the post-colonial period. Finally, we review the relationship between self-determination and state sovereignty. This relationship between the two principles is further complicated since self-determination both leads to and violates state sovereignty. The essay finds that often the role of international law is over-estimated in its consideration of legal enforcement. Specifically, the essay concludes that we must maintain a firm grasp on the international 'politics' of self-determination in order to truly understand the changing nature of the international system and its impact on minority rights.",
author = "David Galbreath",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/13642980500350046",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "539--550",
journal = "International Journal of Human Rights",
issn = "1364-2987",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dealing with Diversity in International Law

AU - Galbreath, David

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - The contradiction between the principles of state sovereignty and national self-determination has been a constant theme in international law. Here we see several approaches to this theme. First, we engage with the underlying questions of self-determination in the context of state-minority relations. Second, we address the relationship between international law and minority rights. In particular, the essay reviews the changing nature of self-determination as we move away from the post-colonial period. Finally, we review the relationship between self-determination and state sovereignty. This relationship between the two principles is further complicated since self-determination both leads to and violates state sovereignty. The essay finds that often the role of international law is over-estimated in its consideration of legal enforcement. Specifically, the essay concludes that we must maintain a firm grasp on the international 'politics' of self-determination in order to truly understand the changing nature of the international system and its impact on minority rights.

AB - The contradiction between the principles of state sovereignty and national self-determination has been a constant theme in international law. Here we see several approaches to this theme. First, we engage with the underlying questions of self-determination in the context of state-minority relations. Second, we address the relationship between international law and minority rights. In particular, the essay reviews the changing nature of self-determination as we move away from the post-colonial period. Finally, we review the relationship between self-determination and state sovereignty. This relationship between the two principles is further complicated since self-determination both leads to and violates state sovereignty. The essay finds that often the role of international law is over-estimated in its consideration of legal enforcement. Specifically, the essay concludes that we must maintain a firm grasp on the international 'politics' of self-determination in order to truly understand the changing nature of the international system and its impact on minority rights.

U2 - 10.1080/13642980500350046

DO - 10.1080/13642980500350046

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 539

EP - 550

JO - International Journal of Human Rights

JF - International Journal of Human Rights

SN - 1364-2987

IS - 4

ER -