Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England

Nick J.B. Isaac (Corresponding Author), Peter N.M. Brotherton, James M. Bullock, Richard D. Gregory, Katrin Boehning-Gaese, Ben Connor, Humphrey Q.P. Crick, Robert P. Freckleton, Jennifer A. Gill, Rosemary S. Hails, Minna Hartikainen, Alison J. Hester, E. J. Milner-Gulland, Thomas H. Oliver, Richard G. Pearson, William J. Sutherland, Chris D. Thomas, Justin M.J. Travis, Lindsay A. Turnbull, Kathy Willis & 2 others Guy Woodward, Georgina M. Mace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Planning for nature conservation has increasingly emphasised the concepts of resilience and spatial networks. Although the importance of habitat networks for individual species is clear, their significance for long-term ecological resilience and multi-species conservation strategies is less established. Referencing spatial network theory, we describe the conceptual basis for defining and assessing a network of wildlife areas that supports species' resilience to multiple forms of perturbations and pressures. We explore actions that could enhance network resilience at a range of scales, based on ecological principles, with reference to four well-established strategies for intervention in a spatial network ("Better, Bigger, More and Joined") from the influential Making Space for Nature report by Lawton et al. (). Building existing theory into useable and scalable approaches applicable to large numbers of species is challenging but tractable. We illustrate the policy context, describe the elements of a long-term adaptive management plan and provide example actions, metrics and targets for early implementation using England as a case study, where there is an opportunity to include large-scale ecological planning in a newly launched 25-year environment plan. Policy implications. The concept of resilient ecological networks has attracted scientific and political support, but there is no consensus on what a resilient network would look like, or how to assess it. Therefore, it is unclear whether existing targets for action will be sufficient to achieve network resilience. We show that the scientific principles to place resilience and network theory at the heart of large-scale and long-term environmental planning are established and ready to implement in practice. Delivering a resilient network to support nature recovery is achievable and can be integrated with ongoing conservation actions and targets, by assessing their effectiveness on properties of the entire network. England's 25 Year Environment Plan promises to deliver a natural environment that is protected and enhanced for the future and so provides the ideal testbed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2537-2543
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume55
Issue number6
Early online date9 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Fingerprint

nature conservation
species conservation
environmental planning
adaptive management
perturbation
habitat
policy
planning
plan

Keywords

  • Biodiversity conservation
  • Climate change
  • Habitat management
  • Metapopulation
  • Nature recovery network
  • Network theory
  • Protected area
  • Resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Isaac, N. J. B., Brotherton, P. N. M., Bullock, J. M., Gregory, R. D., Boehning-Gaese, K., Connor, B., ... Mace, G. M. (2018). Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(6), 2537-2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13196

Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks : Nature conservation in England. / Isaac, Nick J.B. (Corresponding Author); Brotherton, Peter N.M.; Bullock, James M.; Gregory, Richard D.; Boehning-Gaese, Katrin; Connor, Ben; Crick, Humphrey Q.P.; Freckleton, Robert P.; Gill, Jennifer A.; Hails, Rosemary S.; Hartikainen, Minna; Hester, Alison J.; Milner-Gulland, E. J.; Oliver, Thomas H.; Pearson, Richard G.; Sutherland, William J.; Thomas, Chris D.; Travis, Justin M.J.; Turnbull, Lindsay A.; Willis, Kathy; Woodward, Guy; Mace, Georgina M.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 55, No. 6, 11.2018, p. 2537-2543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Isaac, NJB, Brotherton, PNM, Bullock, JM, Gregory, RD, Boehning-Gaese, K, Connor, B, Crick, HQP, Freckleton, RP, Gill, JA, Hails, RS, Hartikainen, M, Hester, AJ, Milner-Gulland, EJ, Oliver, TH, Pearson, RG, Sutherland, WJ, Thomas, CD, Travis, JMJ, Turnbull, LA, Willis, K, Woodward, G & Mace, GM 2018, 'Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England' Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2537-2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13196
Isaac NJB, Brotherton PNM, Bullock JM, Gregory RD, Boehning-Gaese K, Connor B et al. Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018 Nov;55(6):2537-2543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13196
Isaac, Nick J.B. ; Brotherton, Peter N.M. ; Bullock, James M. ; Gregory, Richard D. ; Boehning-Gaese, Katrin ; Connor, Ben ; Crick, Humphrey Q.P. ; Freckleton, Robert P. ; Gill, Jennifer A. ; Hails, Rosemary S. ; Hartikainen, Minna ; Hester, Alison J. ; Milner-Gulland, E. J. ; Oliver, Thomas H. ; Pearson, Richard G. ; Sutherland, William J. ; Thomas, Chris D. ; Travis, Justin M.J. ; Turnbull, Lindsay A. ; Willis, Kathy ; Woodward, Guy ; Mace, Georgina M. / Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks : Nature conservation in England. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 6. pp. 2537-2543.
@article{03f218174fa047c4bb252f5d4af3aee1,
title = "Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England",
abstract = "Planning for nature conservation has increasingly emphasised the concepts of resilience and spatial networks. Although the importance of habitat networks for individual species is clear, their significance for long-term ecological resilience and multi-species conservation strategies is less established. Referencing spatial network theory, we describe the conceptual basis for defining and assessing a network of wildlife areas that supports species' resilience to multiple forms of perturbations and pressures. We explore actions that could enhance network resilience at a range of scales, based on ecological principles, with reference to four well-established strategies for intervention in a spatial network ({"}Better, Bigger, More and Joined{"}) from the influential Making Space for Nature report by Lawton et al. (). Building existing theory into useable and scalable approaches applicable to large numbers of species is challenging but tractable. We illustrate the policy context, describe the elements of a long-term adaptive management plan and provide example actions, metrics and targets for early implementation using England as a case study, where there is an opportunity to include large-scale ecological planning in a newly launched 25-year environment plan. Policy implications. The concept of resilient ecological networks has attracted scientific and political support, but there is no consensus on what a resilient network would look like, or how to assess it. Therefore, it is unclear whether existing targets for action will be sufficient to achieve network resilience. We show that the scientific principles to place resilience and network theory at the heart of large-scale and long-term environmental planning are established and ready to implement in practice. Delivering a resilient network to support nature recovery is achievable and can be integrated with ongoing conservation actions and targets, by assessing their effectiveness on properties of the entire network. England's 25 Year Environment Plan promises to deliver a natural environment that is protected and enhanced for the future and so provides the ideal testbed.",
keywords = "Biodiversity conservation, Climate change, Habitat management, Metapopulation, Nature recovery network, Network theory, Protected area, Resilience",
author = "Isaac, {Nick J.B.} and Brotherton, {Peter N.M.} and Bullock, {James M.} and Gregory, {Richard D.} and Katrin Boehning-Gaese and Ben Connor and Crick, {Humphrey Q.P.} and Freckleton, {Robert P.} and Gill, {Jennifer A.} and Hails, {Rosemary S.} and Minna Hartikainen and Hester, {Alison J.} and Milner-Gulland, {E. J.} and Oliver, {Thomas H.} and Pearson, {Richard G.} and Sutherland, {William J.} and Thomas, {Chris D.} and Travis, {Justin M.J.} and Turnbull, {Lindsay A.} and Kathy Willis and Guy Woodward and Mace, {Georgina M.}",
note = "Natural Capital Initiative",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13196",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "2537--2543",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks

T2 - Nature conservation in England

AU - Isaac, Nick J.B.

AU - Brotherton, Peter N.M.

AU - Bullock, James M.

AU - Gregory, Richard D.

AU - Boehning-Gaese, Katrin

AU - Connor, Ben

AU - Crick, Humphrey Q.P.

AU - Freckleton, Robert P.

AU - Gill, Jennifer A.

AU - Hails, Rosemary S.

AU - Hartikainen, Minna

AU - Hester, Alison J.

AU - Milner-Gulland, E. J.

AU - Oliver, Thomas H.

AU - Pearson, Richard G.

AU - Sutherland, William J.

AU - Thomas, Chris D.

AU - Travis, Justin M.J.

AU - Turnbull, Lindsay A.

AU - Willis, Kathy

AU - Woodward, Guy

AU - Mace, Georgina M.

N1 - Natural Capital Initiative

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - Planning for nature conservation has increasingly emphasised the concepts of resilience and spatial networks. Although the importance of habitat networks for individual species is clear, their significance for long-term ecological resilience and multi-species conservation strategies is less established. Referencing spatial network theory, we describe the conceptual basis for defining and assessing a network of wildlife areas that supports species' resilience to multiple forms of perturbations and pressures. We explore actions that could enhance network resilience at a range of scales, based on ecological principles, with reference to four well-established strategies for intervention in a spatial network ("Better, Bigger, More and Joined") from the influential Making Space for Nature report by Lawton et al. (). Building existing theory into useable and scalable approaches applicable to large numbers of species is challenging but tractable. We illustrate the policy context, describe the elements of a long-term adaptive management plan and provide example actions, metrics and targets for early implementation using England as a case study, where there is an opportunity to include large-scale ecological planning in a newly launched 25-year environment plan. Policy implications. The concept of resilient ecological networks has attracted scientific and political support, but there is no consensus on what a resilient network would look like, or how to assess it. Therefore, it is unclear whether existing targets for action will be sufficient to achieve network resilience. We show that the scientific principles to place resilience and network theory at the heart of large-scale and long-term environmental planning are established and ready to implement in practice. Delivering a resilient network to support nature recovery is achievable and can be integrated with ongoing conservation actions and targets, by assessing their effectiveness on properties of the entire network. England's 25 Year Environment Plan promises to deliver a natural environment that is protected and enhanced for the future and so provides the ideal testbed.

AB - Planning for nature conservation has increasingly emphasised the concepts of resilience and spatial networks. Although the importance of habitat networks for individual species is clear, their significance for long-term ecological resilience and multi-species conservation strategies is less established. Referencing spatial network theory, we describe the conceptual basis for defining and assessing a network of wildlife areas that supports species' resilience to multiple forms of perturbations and pressures. We explore actions that could enhance network resilience at a range of scales, based on ecological principles, with reference to four well-established strategies for intervention in a spatial network ("Better, Bigger, More and Joined") from the influential Making Space for Nature report by Lawton et al. (). Building existing theory into useable and scalable approaches applicable to large numbers of species is challenging but tractable. We illustrate the policy context, describe the elements of a long-term adaptive management plan and provide example actions, metrics and targets for early implementation using England as a case study, where there is an opportunity to include large-scale ecological planning in a newly launched 25-year environment plan. Policy implications. The concept of resilient ecological networks has attracted scientific and political support, but there is no consensus on what a resilient network would look like, or how to assess it. Therefore, it is unclear whether existing targets for action will be sufficient to achieve network resilience. We show that the scientific principles to place resilience and network theory at the heart of large-scale and long-term environmental planning are established and ready to implement in practice. Delivering a resilient network to support nature recovery is achievable and can be integrated with ongoing conservation actions and targets, by assessing their effectiveness on properties of the entire network. England's 25 Year Environment Plan promises to deliver a natural environment that is protected and enhanced for the future and so provides the ideal testbed.

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Climate change

KW - Habitat management

KW - Metapopulation

KW - Nature recovery network

KW - Network theory

KW - Protected area

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050361250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13196

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13196

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 2537

EP - 2543

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 6

ER -