Defining hip pain for population studies

F. Birrell, M. Lunt, Gary John MacFarlane, A. J. Silman

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Identifying pain as coming from the hip joint is more complex than for other large joint sites. There is no accepted best approach to defining hip pain for use in clinical and epidemiological studies.

Objective: To compare the use of verbal and pictorial descriptions in ascertaining hip pain.

Methods: A cross sectional population based study on 2935 subjects compared groups reporting hip pain either using a pain diagram, or answering a question specifically asking about hip pain. The groups were compared with a group reporting no pain for various clinical indices of hip disease, including limitation of range of movement and evidence of radiographic change.

Results: Subjects who satisfied both criteria for hip pain were substantially more likely to have used analgesics, consulted a physician, or had walking difficulty. Differences in range of movement were less clear cut but radiographic damage was more evident in those with both criteria.

Conclusions: Subjects whose pain satisfies both a pictorial and a verbal definition (where the patient uses the word "hip") have the strongest relation to indicators of hip disease. This approach is recommended when a specific definition is required for ascertaining individuals for study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-98
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Volume64
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • REPLACEMENT

Cite this

Defining hip pain for population studies. / Birrell, F.; Lunt, M.; MacFarlane, Gary John; Silman, A. J.

In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Vol. 64, 2005, p. 95-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Birrell, F. ; Lunt, M. ; MacFarlane, Gary John ; Silman, A. J. / Defining hip pain for population studies. In: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2005 ; Vol. 64. pp. 95-98.
@article{0b7c26ba11224b9fa440edc523ca148f,
title = "Defining hip pain for population studies",
abstract = "Background: Identifying pain as coming from the hip joint is more complex than for other large joint sites. There is no accepted best approach to defining hip pain for use in clinical and epidemiological studies.Objective: To compare the use of verbal and pictorial descriptions in ascertaining hip pain.Methods: A cross sectional population based study on 2935 subjects compared groups reporting hip pain either using a pain diagram, or answering a question specifically asking about hip pain. The groups were compared with a group reporting no pain for various clinical indices of hip disease, including limitation of range of movement and evidence of radiographic change.Results: Subjects who satisfied both criteria for hip pain were substantially more likely to have used analgesics, consulted a physician, or had walking difficulty. Differences in range of movement were less clear cut but radiographic damage was more evident in those with both criteria.Conclusions: Subjects whose pain satisfies both a pictorial and a verbal definition (where the patient uses the word {"}hip{"}) have the strongest relation to indicators of hip disease. This approach is recommended when a specific definition is required for ascertaining individuals for study.",
keywords = "REPLACEMENT",
author = "F. Birrell and M. Lunt and MacFarlane, {Gary John} and Silman, {A. J.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1136/ard.2003.018788",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "95--98",
journal = "Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases",
issn = "0003-4967",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining hip pain for population studies

AU - Birrell, F.

AU - Lunt, M.

AU - MacFarlane, Gary John

AU - Silman, A. J.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Background: Identifying pain as coming from the hip joint is more complex than for other large joint sites. There is no accepted best approach to defining hip pain for use in clinical and epidemiological studies.Objective: To compare the use of verbal and pictorial descriptions in ascertaining hip pain.Methods: A cross sectional population based study on 2935 subjects compared groups reporting hip pain either using a pain diagram, or answering a question specifically asking about hip pain. The groups were compared with a group reporting no pain for various clinical indices of hip disease, including limitation of range of movement and evidence of radiographic change.Results: Subjects who satisfied both criteria for hip pain were substantially more likely to have used analgesics, consulted a physician, or had walking difficulty. Differences in range of movement were less clear cut but radiographic damage was more evident in those with both criteria.Conclusions: Subjects whose pain satisfies both a pictorial and a verbal definition (where the patient uses the word "hip") have the strongest relation to indicators of hip disease. This approach is recommended when a specific definition is required for ascertaining individuals for study.

AB - Background: Identifying pain as coming from the hip joint is more complex than for other large joint sites. There is no accepted best approach to defining hip pain for use in clinical and epidemiological studies.Objective: To compare the use of verbal and pictorial descriptions in ascertaining hip pain.Methods: A cross sectional population based study on 2935 subjects compared groups reporting hip pain either using a pain diagram, or answering a question specifically asking about hip pain. The groups were compared with a group reporting no pain for various clinical indices of hip disease, including limitation of range of movement and evidence of radiographic change.Results: Subjects who satisfied both criteria for hip pain were substantially more likely to have used analgesics, consulted a physician, or had walking difficulty. Differences in range of movement were less clear cut but radiographic damage was more evident in those with both criteria.Conclusions: Subjects whose pain satisfies both a pictorial and a verbal definition (where the patient uses the word "hip") have the strongest relation to indicators of hip disease. This approach is recommended when a specific definition is required for ascertaining individuals for study.

KW - REPLACEMENT

U2 - 10.1136/ard.2003.018788

DO - 10.1136/ard.2003.018788

M3 - Editorial

VL - 64

SP - 95

EP - 98

JO - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

JF - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

SN - 0003-4967

ER -