Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The challenge of feeding 9 to 10 Billion people by 2050 may seem like a big enough challenge in itself, but we also need to achieve this feat whilst, at the same time, reducing adverse impacts of food production on a whole range of ecosystem services. One suggested response is “sustainable intensification” which entails delivering safer, nutritious food from the same area whilst maintaining ecosystem service provision. In this review, I examine sustainable intensification and consider alternatives such as management of food demand and waste reduction. I conclude that sustainable intensification has a role to play, but this must be accompanied by fundamental change in global food systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-23
Number of pages6
JournalGlobal Food Security
Volume2
Issue number1
Early online date21 Dec 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Food Supply
food security
ecosystem services
waste reduction
food
Pressure
ecosystem service
Food
global change
food production
Ecosystems
Ecosystem
service provision
land
demand
management

Keywords

  • diet change
  • ecosystem services
  • food demand
  • food production
  • food security
  • sustainable intensification
  • journal
  • resilience
  • GlFoodSecJ
  • excluded
  • SI
  • Yields
  • land use
  • SI alternatives
  • land availability

Cite this

Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land. / Smith, Pete.

In: Global Food Security, Vol. 2, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 18-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63ab8c7c43ce4a39996e66bad68fd365,
title = "Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land",
abstract = "The challenge of feeding 9 to 10 Billion people by 2050 may seem like a big enough challenge in itself, but we also need to achieve this feat whilst, at the same time, reducing adverse impacts of food production on a whole range of ecosystem services. One suggested response is “sustainable intensification” which entails delivering safer, nutritious food from the same area whilst maintaining ecosystem service provision. In this review, I examine sustainable intensification and consider alternatives such as management of food demand and waste reduction. I conclude that sustainable intensification has a role to play, but this must be accompanied by fundamental change in global food systems.",
keywords = "diet change, ecosystem services, food demand, food production, food security, sustainable intensification, journal, resilience, GlFoodSecJ, excluded, SI, Yields, land use, SI alternatives, land availability",
author = "Pete Smith",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.gfs.2012.11.008",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "18--23",
journal = "Global Food Security",
issn = "2211-9124",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delivering food security without increasing pressure on land

AU - Smith, Pete

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The challenge of feeding 9 to 10 Billion people by 2050 may seem like a big enough challenge in itself, but we also need to achieve this feat whilst, at the same time, reducing adverse impacts of food production on a whole range of ecosystem services. One suggested response is “sustainable intensification” which entails delivering safer, nutritious food from the same area whilst maintaining ecosystem service provision. In this review, I examine sustainable intensification and consider alternatives such as management of food demand and waste reduction. I conclude that sustainable intensification has a role to play, but this must be accompanied by fundamental change in global food systems.

AB - The challenge of feeding 9 to 10 Billion people by 2050 may seem like a big enough challenge in itself, but we also need to achieve this feat whilst, at the same time, reducing adverse impacts of food production on a whole range of ecosystem services. One suggested response is “sustainable intensification” which entails delivering safer, nutritious food from the same area whilst maintaining ecosystem service provision. In this review, I examine sustainable intensification and consider alternatives such as management of food demand and waste reduction. I conclude that sustainable intensification has a role to play, but this must be accompanied by fundamental change in global food systems.

KW - diet change

KW - ecosystem services

KW - food demand

KW - food production

KW - food security

KW - sustainable intensification

KW - journal

KW - resilience

KW - GlFoodSecJ

KW - excluded

KW - SI

KW - Yields

KW - land use

KW - SI alternatives

KW - land availability

U2 - 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.11.008

DO - 10.1016/j.gfs.2012.11.008

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 18

EP - 23

JO - Global Food Security

JF - Global Food Security

SN - 2211-9124

IS - 1

ER -