Dempster-Shafer argument schemes

Yuqing Tang, Nir Oren, Simon Parsons, Katia Sycara

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Dempster-Shafer theory, which can be regarded as a generalisation of probability theory, is a widely used formalism for reasoning with uncertain information. The application of the theory hinges on the use of a rule for combining evidence from different sources. A number of different combination rules have been applied, each of which makes certain assumptions about the evidence. Here we describe several of these rules as argument schemes, using critical questions to capture the assumptions behind the rules. An example illustrates how we imagine these argument schemes might be used.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages20
Publication statusPublished - 2013
EventTenth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2013) - Minnesota, United States
Duration: 6 May 201310 May 2013

Conference

ConferenceTenth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2013)
CountryUnited States
CityMinnesota
Period6/05/1310/05/13

Cite this

Tang, Y., Oren, N., Parsons, S., & Sycara, K. (2013). Dempster-Shafer argument schemes. Paper presented at Tenth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2013), Minnesota, United States.

Dempster-Shafer argument schemes. / Tang, Yuqing; Oren, Nir; Parsons, Simon; Sycara, Katia.

2013. Paper presented at Tenth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2013), Minnesota, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Tang, Y, Oren, N, Parsons, S & Sycara, K 2013, 'Dempster-Shafer argument schemes' Paper presented at Tenth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2013), Minnesota, United States, 6/05/13 - 10/05/13, .
Tang Y, Oren N, Parsons S, Sycara K. Dempster-Shafer argument schemes. 2013. Paper presented at Tenth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2013), Minnesota, United States.
Tang, Yuqing ; Oren, Nir ; Parsons, Simon ; Sycara, Katia. / Dempster-Shafer argument schemes. Paper presented at Tenth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2013), Minnesota, United States.20 p.
@conference{44b53a3a2a1a46c2a0e9038b9730a9ad,
title = "Dempster-Shafer argument schemes",
abstract = "Dempster-Shafer theory, which can be regarded as a generalisation of probability theory, is a widely used formalism for reasoning with uncertain information. The application of the theory hinges on the use of a rule for combining evidence from different sources. A number of different combination rules have been applied, each of which makes certain assumptions about the evidence. Here we describe several of these rules as argument schemes, using critical questions to capture the assumptions behind the rules. An example illustrates how we imagine these argument schemes might be used.",
author = "Yuqing Tang and Nir Oren and Simon Parsons and Katia Sycara",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
note = "Tenth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2013) ; Conference date: 06-05-2013 Through 10-05-2013",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Dempster-Shafer argument schemes

AU - Tang, Yuqing

AU - Oren, Nir

AU - Parsons, Simon

AU - Sycara, Katia

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Dempster-Shafer theory, which can be regarded as a generalisation of probability theory, is a widely used formalism for reasoning with uncertain information. The application of the theory hinges on the use of a rule for combining evidence from different sources. A number of different combination rules have been applied, each of which makes certain assumptions about the evidence. Here we describe several of these rules as argument schemes, using critical questions to capture the assumptions behind the rules. An example illustrates how we imagine these argument schemes might be used.

AB - Dempster-Shafer theory, which can be regarded as a generalisation of probability theory, is a widely used formalism for reasoning with uncertain information. The application of the theory hinges on the use of a rule for combining evidence from different sources. A number of different combination rules have been applied, each of which makes certain assumptions about the evidence. Here we describe several of these rules as argument schemes, using critical questions to capture the assumptions behind the rules. An example illustrates how we imagine these argument schemes might be used.

M3 - Paper

ER -