Density-dependent populations require density-dependent elasticity analysis: an illustration using the LPA model of Tribolium.

Timothy Guy Benton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    29 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    1. Elasticity and sensitivity analyses are used widely in evolutionary biology, ecology and population management. However, almost all applications ignore density dependence, despite the widespread assumption that density dependence is ubiquitous. We assess whether this matters by comparing density-dependent and density-independent elasticity analyses for the LPA model of Tribolium.

    2. Density-independent elasticities of lambda are a poor indicator of the effects of changes in demographic parameters on population size, even for populations at stable equilibrium. With non-equilibrium dynamics, the divergence can be particularly large. In the extreme, a change in a demographic parameter with a positive effect on individual fitness can reduce mean population size, so even the sign of a density-independent elasticity may be wrong. Elasticities of larval, pupal and adult numbers are not proportional to each other, neither are they proportional to elasticities of total population size.

    3. A full density-dependent analysis is therefore vital when concerned with effects on population numbers, as in population management, pest control and prediction of population effects of toxins.

    4. When examining the consequences for individual fitness of changes in demographic parameters, density-independent elasticities provide a more useful approximation to the density-dependent values. However, they fail to detect cases where non-equilibrium dynamics means that particular life histories gain an advantage by exploiting predictable periods when density dependence is relaxed.

    5. This phenomenon can produce a marked change in the pattern of elasticities as a bifurcation is crossed. The corresponding changes in selection pressures may act to stabilize dynamics in some circumstances and destabilize them in others. There is no single answer to the question of whether selection should favour equilibrium or non-equilibrium dynamics.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)94-105
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
    Volume72
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • chaos
    • life histories
    • matrix models
    • population dynamics
    • sensitivity analysis
    • STRUCTURED POPULATIONS
    • SELECTION PRESSURES
    • NATURAL-SELECTION
    • GENETIC-ANALYSIS
    • GROWTH RATE
    • DYNAMICS
    • EVOLUTION
    • ENVIRONMENTS
    • PARAMETERS
    • CASTANEUM

    Cite this

    Density-dependent populations require density-dependent elasticity analysis: an illustration using the LPA model of Tribolium. / Benton, Timothy Guy.

    In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 72, 2003, p. 94-105.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{2250c45f0d56455db95813dc9a476789,
    title = "Density-dependent populations require density-dependent elasticity analysis: an illustration using the LPA model of Tribolium.",
    abstract = "1. Elasticity and sensitivity analyses are used widely in evolutionary biology, ecology and population management. However, almost all applications ignore density dependence, despite the widespread assumption that density dependence is ubiquitous. We assess whether this matters by comparing density-dependent and density-independent elasticity analyses for the LPA model of Tribolium.2. Density-independent elasticities of lambda are a poor indicator of the effects of changes in demographic parameters on population size, even for populations at stable equilibrium. With non-equilibrium dynamics, the divergence can be particularly large. In the extreme, a change in a demographic parameter with a positive effect on individual fitness can reduce mean population size, so even the sign of a density-independent elasticity may be wrong. Elasticities of larval, pupal and adult numbers are not proportional to each other, neither are they proportional to elasticities of total population size.3. A full density-dependent analysis is therefore vital when concerned with effects on population numbers, as in population management, pest control and prediction of population effects of toxins.4. When examining the consequences for individual fitness of changes in demographic parameters, density-independent elasticities provide a more useful approximation to the density-dependent values. However, they fail to detect cases where non-equilibrium dynamics means that particular life histories gain an advantage by exploiting predictable periods when density dependence is relaxed.5. This phenomenon can produce a marked change in the pattern of elasticities as a bifurcation is crossed. The corresponding changes in selection pressures may act to stabilize dynamics in some circumstances and destabilize them in others. There is no single answer to the question of whether selection should favour equilibrium or non-equilibrium dynamics.",
    keywords = "chaos, life histories, matrix models, population dynamics, sensitivity analysis, STRUCTURED POPULATIONS, SELECTION PRESSURES, NATURAL-SELECTION, GENETIC-ANALYSIS, GROWTH RATE, DYNAMICS, EVOLUTION, ENVIRONMENTS, PARAMETERS, CASTANEUM",
    author = "Benton, {Timothy Guy}",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00684.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "72",
    pages = "94--105",
    journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
    issn = "0021-8790",
    publisher = "BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Density-dependent populations require density-dependent elasticity analysis: an illustration using the LPA model of Tribolium.

    AU - Benton, Timothy Guy

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - 1. Elasticity and sensitivity analyses are used widely in evolutionary biology, ecology and population management. However, almost all applications ignore density dependence, despite the widespread assumption that density dependence is ubiquitous. We assess whether this matters by comparing density-dependent and density-independent elasticity analyses for the LPA model of Tribolium.2. Density-independent elasticities of lambda are a poor indicator of the effects of changes in demographic parameters on population size, even for populations at stable equilibrium. With non-equilibrium dynamics, the divergence can be particularly large. In the extreme, a change in a demographic parameter with a positive effect on individual fitness can reduce mean population size, so even the sign of a density-independent elasticity may be wrong. Elasticities of larval, pupal and adult numbers are not proportional to each other, neither are they proportional to elasticities of total population size.3. A full density-dependent analysis is therefore vital when concerned with effects on population numbers, as in population management, pest control and prediction of population effects of toxins.4. When examining the consequences for individual fitness of changes in demographic parameters, density-independent elasticities provide a more useful approximation to the density-dependent values. However, they fail to detect cases where non-equilibrium dynamics means that particular life histories gain an advantage by exploiting predictable periods when density dependence is relaxed.5. This phenomenon can produce a marked change in the pattern of elasticities as a bifurcation is crossed. The corresponding changes in selection pressures may act to stabilize dynamics in some circumstances and destabilize them in others. There is no single answer to the question of whether selection should favour equilibrium or non-equilibrium dynamics.

    AB - 1. Elasticity and sensitivity analyses are used widely in evolutionary biology, ecology and population management. However, almost all applications ignore density dependence, despite the widespread assumption that density dependence is ubiquitous. We assess whether this matters by comparing density-dependent and density-independent elasticity analyses for the LPA model of Tribolium.2. Density-independent elasticities of lambda are a poor indicator of the effects of changes in demographic parameters on population size, even for populations at stable equilibrium. With non-equilibrium dynamics, the divergence can be particularly large. In the extreme, a change in a demographic parameter with a positive effect on individual fitness can reduce mean population size, so even the sign of a density-independent elasticity may be wrong. Elasticities of larval, pupal and adult numbers are not proportional to each other, neither are they proportional to elasticities of total population size.3. A full density-dependent analysis is therefore vital when concerned with effects on population numbers, as in population management, pest control and prediction of population effects of toxins.4. When examining the consequences for individual fitness of changes in demographic parameters, density-independent elasticities provide a more useful approximation to the density-dependent values. However, they fail to detect cases where non-equilibrium dynamics means that particular life histories gain an advantage by exploiting predictable periods when density dependence is relaxed.5. This phenomenon can produce a marked change in the pattern of elasticities as a bifurcation is crossed. The corresponding changes in selection pressures may act to stabilize dynamics in some circumstances and destabilize them in others. There is no single answer to the question of whether selection should favour equilibrium or non-equilibrium dynamics.

    KW - chaos

    KW - life histories

    KW - matrix models

    KW - population dynamics

    KW - sensitivity analysis

    KW - STRUCTURED POPULATIONS

    KW - SELECTION PRESSURES

    KW - NATURAL-SELECTION

    KW - GENETIC-ANALYSIS

    KW - GROWTH RATE

    KW - DYNAMICS

    KW - EVOLUTION

    KW - ENVIRONMENTS

    KW - PARAMETERS

    KW - CASTANEUM

    U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00684.x

    DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00684.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 72

    SP - 94

    EP - 105

    JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

    JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

    SN - 0021-8790

    ER -