Deployment of microbial biosensors to assess the performance of ameliorants in metal-contaminated soils

Snežana P. Maletić*, Malcolm A. Watson, Saad Dehlawi, Elizabeth E. Diplock, David Mardlin, Graeme I. Paton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The remediation of metal-impacted soils requires either the enhanced mobility (and capture) of the target analytes or their effective complexation/immobilisation. In this study, a range of ameliorants (activated carbon, bonemeal, bentonite and CaSx (calcium polysulphide)) were compared to assess their effectiveness in immobilising metals in soils. In addition to chemical analysis (pH and trace element analysis), microbial biosensors were used to assess changes in the water-soluble biotoxicity of metals as a consequence of ameliorant dosing. Management of soil ameliorants requires an enhancement of K d (solid/solution partition coefficient) if soil leachate is to meet predefined environmental quality standards. Of the ameliorants tested, CaSx was the most effective per unit added for both laboratory-amended and historically contaminated soils, regardless of the metal tested. At the ameliorant concentrations used to effectively immobilise the metals, the biosensor performance was not impaired. Microbial biosensors offered a rapid and relevant screening tool to validate the reduced toxicity associated with the ameliorant dosing and could be calibrated to complement chemical analysis. While laboratory-amended soils were a logical way to evaluate the performance of the ameliorants, they were generally associated with K d values an order of magnitude lower than those of historically contaminated soils.

Original languageEnglish
Article number85
Number of pages13
JournalWater, Air and Soil Pollution
Volume226
Issue number4
Early online date9 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Biosensors
Metals
Soils
metal
soil
chemical analysis
bentonite
solid solution
partition coefficient
complexation
Bentonite
immobilization
Polysulfides
activated carbon
leachate
remediation
Trace Elements
calcium
contaminated soil
trace element

Keywords

  • Biosensor analysis
  • Heavy metals
  • K d value
  • Soil ameliorants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pollution
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Ecological Modelling
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Deployment of microbial biosensors to assess the performance of ameliorants in metal-contaminated soils. / Maletić, Snežana P.; Watson, Malcolm A.; Dehlawi, Saad; Diplock, Elizabeth E.; Mardlin, David; Paton, Graeme I.

In: Water, Air and Soil Pollution, Vol. 226, No. 4, 85, 04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maletić, Snežana P. ; Watson, Malcolm A. ; Dehlawi, Saad ; Diplock, Elizabeth E. ; Mardlin, David ; Paton, Graeme I. / Deployment of microbial biosensors to assess the performance of ameliorants in metal-contaminated soils. In: Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 2015 ; Vol. 226, No. 4.
@article{a44f9392017840c898128fc2d24807a1,
title = "Deployment of microbial biosensors to assess the performance of ameliorants in metal-contaminated soils",
abstract = "The remediation of metal-impacted soils requires either the enhanced mobility (and capture) of the target analytes or their effective complexation/immobilisation. In this study, a range of ameliorants (activated carbon, bonemeal, bentonite and CaSx (calcium polysulphide)) were compared to assess their effectiveness in immobilising metals in soils. In addition to chemical analysis (pH and trace element analysis), microbial biosensors were used to assess changes in the water-soluble biotoxicity of metals as a consequence of ameliorant dosing. Management of soil ameliorants requires an enhancement of K d (solid/solution partition coefficient) if soil leachate is to meet predefined environmental quality standards. Of the ameliorants tested, CaSx was the most effective per unit added for both laboratory-amended and historically contaminated soils, regardless of the metal tested. At the ameliorant concentrations used to effectively immobilise the metals, the biosensor performance was not impaired. Microbial biosensors offered a rapid and relevant screening tool to validate the reduced toxicity associated with the ameliorant dosing and could be calibrated to complement chemical analysis. While laboratory-amended soils were a logical way to evaluate the performance of the ameliorants, they were generally associated with K d values an order of magnitude lower than those of historically contaminated soils.",
keywords = "Biosensor analysis, Heavy metals, K d value, Soil ameliorants",
author = "Maletić, {Snežana P.} and Watson, {Malcolm A.} and Saad Dehlawi and Diplock, {Elizabeth E.} and David Mardlin and Paton, {Graeme I.}",
note = "Acknowledgments SPM and MAW acknowledge European funding for FP6 project no. 043741, SD acknowledges funding from the University of Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. EED acknowledges funding from EPSRC and Remedios Limited, Aberdeen.",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11270-015-2358-x",
language = "English",
volume = "226",
journal = "Water, Air and Soil Pollution",
issn = "0049-6979",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deployment of microbial biosensors to assess the performance of ameliorants in metal-contaminated soils

AU - Maletić, Snežana P.

AU - Watson, Malcolm A.

AU - Dehlawi, Saad

AU - Diplock, Elizabeth E.

AU - Mardlin, David

AU - Paton, Graeme I.

N1 - Acknowledgments SPM and MAW acknowledge European funding for FP6 project no. 043741, SD acknowledges funding from the University of Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. EED acknowledges funding from EPSRC and Remedios Limited, Aberdeen.

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - The remediation of metal-impacted soils requires either the enhanced mobility (and capture) of the target analytes or their effective complexation/immobilisation. In this study, a range of ameliorants (activated carbon, bonemeal, bentonite and CaSx (calcium polysulphide)) were compared to assess their effectiveness in immobilising metals in soils. In addition to chemical analysis (pH and trace element analysis), microbial biosensors were used to assess changes in the water-soluble biotoxicity of metals as a consequence of ameliorant dosing. Management of soil ameliorants requires an enhancement of K d (solid/solution partition coefficient) if soil leachate is to meet predefined environmental quality standards. Of the ameliorants tested, CaSx was the most effective per unit added for both laboratory-amended and historically contaminated soils, regardless of the metal tested. At the ameliorant concentrations used to effectively immobilise the metals, the biosensor performance was not impaired. Microbial biosensors offered a rapid and relevant screening tool to validate the reduced toxicity associated with the ameliorant dosing and could be calibrated to complement chemical analysis. While laboratory-amended soils were a logical way to evaluate the performance of the ameliorants, they were generally associated with K d values an order of magnitude lower than those of historically contaminated soils.

AB - The remediation of metal-impacted soils requires either the enhanced mobility (and capture) of the target analytes or their effective complexation/immobilisation. In this study, a range of ameliorants (activated carbon, bonemeal, bentonite and CaSx (calcium polysulphide)) were compared to assess their effectiveness in immobilising metals in soils. In addition to chemical analysis (pH and trace element analysis), microbial biosensors were used to assess changes in the water-soluble biotoxicity of metals as a consequence of ameliorant dosing. Management of soil ameliorants requires an enhancement of K d (solid/solution partition coefficient) if soil leachate is to meet predefined environmental quality standards. Of the ameliorants tested, CaSx was the most effective per unit added for both laboratory-amended and historically contaminated soils, regardless of the metal tested. At the ameliorant concentrations used to effectively immobilise the metals, the biosensor performance was not impaired. Microbial biosensors offered a rapid and relevant screening tool to validate the reduced toxicity associated with the ameliorant dosing and could be calibrated to complement chemical analysis. While laboratory-amended soils were a logical way to evaluate the performance of the ameliorants, they were generally associated with K d values an order of magnitude lower than those of historically contaminated soils.

KW - Biosensor analysis

KW - Heavy metals

KW - K d value

KW - Soil ameliorants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924405592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11270-015-2358-x

DO - 10.1007/s11270-015-2358-x

M3 - Article

VL - 226

JO - Water, Air and Soil Pollution

JF - Water, Air and Soil Pollution

SN - 0049-6979

IS - 4

M1 - 85

ER -