Descriptive validity of alternative intertemporal models for health outcomes

an axiomatic test

Marjon Pol van der, John Cairns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intertemporal preferences for health are an important concept when modelling health-affecting behaviour and with respect to informing discounting practice in economic evaluation. The aim of this paper is to test robustly stationarity, the key axiom of the Discounted Utility model, and to test whether the quasi-hyperbolic or generalised hyperbolic model provides a better description of individual time preferences for health outcomes when stationarity is violated. Very little is known about the descriptive validity of the quasi-hyperbolic model. The different models can lead to different predictions and it is therefore crucial to test which functional form is more descriptively valid. An axiomatic approach is used. Intertemporal preferences were elicited from 203 university students. The results showed that stationarity is violated. Individuals discounted both initial delay and further delays between outcomes at a decreasing rate. This suggests that the quasi-hyperbolic model may not be appropriate to use in intertemporal analyses of health behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)770-782
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Economics
Volume20
Issue number7
Early online date9 Jun 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Health
Health Behavior
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Students
Delay Discounting

Keywords

  • intertemporal preferences
  • stationarity
  • hyperbolic discounting
  • health

Cite this

Descriptive validity of alternative intertemporal models for health outcomes : an axiomatic test. / Pol van der, Marjon; Cairns, John.

In: Health Economics, Vol. 20, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 770-782.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{380ee3a1d8024549b3f65d33beb91a0f,
title = "Descriptive validity of alternative intertemporal models for health outcomes: an axiomatic test",
abstract = "Intertemporal preferences for health are an important concept when modelling health-affecting behaviour and with respect to informing discounting practice in economic evaluation. The aim of this paper is to test robustly stationarity, the key axiom of the Discounted Utility model, and to test whether the quasi-hyperbolic or generalised hyperbolic model provides a better description of individual time preferences for health outcomes when stationarity is violated. Very little is known about the descriptive validity of the quasi-hyperbolic model. The different models can lead to different predictions and it is therefore crucial to test which functional form is more descriptively valid. An axiomatic approach is used. Intertemporal preferences were elicited from 203 university students. The results showed that stationarity is violated. Individuals discounted both initial delay and further delays between outcomes at a decreasing rate. This suggests that the quasi-hyperbolic model may not be appropriate to use in intertemporal analyses of health behaviour.",
keywords = "intertemporal preferences, stationarity, hyperbolic discounting, health",
author = "{Pol van der}, Marjon and John Cairns",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/hec.1628",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "770--782",
journal = "Health Economics",
issn = "1057-9230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Descriptive validity of alternative intertemporal models for health outcomes

T2 - an axiomatic test

AU - Pol van der, Marjon

AU - Cairns, John

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Intertemporal preferences for health are an important concept when modelling health-affecting behaviour and with respect to informing discounting practice in economic evaluation. The aim of this paper is to test robustly stationarity, the key axiom of the Discounted Utility model, and to test whether the quasi-hyperbolic or generalised hyperbolic model provides a better description of individual time preferences for health outcomes when stationarity is violated. Very little is known about the descriptive validity of the quasi-hyperbolic model. The different models can lead to different predictions and it is therefore crucial to test which functional form is more descriptively valid. An axiomatic approach is used. Intertemporal preferences were elicited from 203 university students. The results showed that stationarity is violated. Individuals discounted both initial delay and further delays between outcomes at a decreasing rate. This suggests that the quasi-hyperbolic model may not be appropriate to use in intertemporal analyses of health behaviour.

AB - Intertemporal preferences for health are an important concept when modelling health-affecting behaviour and with respect to informing discounting practice in economic evaluation. The aim of this paper is to test robustly stationarity, the key axiom of the Discounted Utility model, and to test whether the quasi-hyperbolic or generalised hyperbolic model provides a better description of individual time preferences for health outcomes when stationarity is violated. Very little is known about the descriptive validity of the quasi-hyperbolic model. The different models can lead to different predictions and it is therefore crucial to test which functional form is more descriptively valid. An axiomatic approach is used. Intertemporal preferences were elicited from 203 university students. The results showed that stationarity is violated. Individuals discounted both initial delay and further delays between outcomes at a decreasing rate. This suggests that the quasi-hyperbolic model may not be appropriate to use in intertemporal analyses of health behaviour.

KW - intertemporal preferences

KW - stationarity

KW - hyperbolic discounting

KW - health

U2 - 10.1002/hec.1628

DO - 10.1002/hec.1628

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 770

EP - 782

JO - Health Economics

JF - Health Economics

SN - 1057-9230

IS - 7

ER -