Design Matters

Major house builders and the design challenge of brownfield housing

Steven Alan Tiesdell, David Adams

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    35 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The quality of contemporary residential development, and the associated design challenge for house builders, are important current policy issues in England. Until recently, better-designed contemporary housing development was more frequently seen on smaller, more constrained urban or brownfield sites and more rarely on greenfield sites. Set against a significant shift in the prevailing planning regime during the 1990s (from greenfield development to an express policy emphasis on brownfield development), this paper attempts to explain this observation. Utilizing the concept of ‘opportunity space’, it develops a model of the role of design and the designer in the development process, which is then used to account for differences in the quality of development on greenfield and brownfield sites. It is suggested that the development of greenfield and brownfield sites displays significant contrasts and that, as a consequence, successful brownfield developers yield opportunity space in their business strategies to designers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-45
    Number of pages22
    JournalJournal of Urban Design
    Volume9
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    builder
    brownfield site
    housing
    residential development
    urban site
    housing development
    Builders
    planning
    policy

    Cite this

    Design Matters : Major house builders and the design challenge of brownfield housing. / Tiesdell, Steven Alan; Adams, David.

    In: Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2004, p. 23-45.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Tiesdell, Steven Alan ; Adams, David. / Design Matters : Major house builders and the design challenge of brownfield housing. In: Journal of Urban Design. 2004 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 23-45.
    @article{84749950cc6640db9ea2848d956c9f81,
    title = "Design Matters: Major house builders and the design challenge of brownfield housing",
    abstract = "The quality of contemporary residential development, and the associated design challenge for house builders, are important current policy issues in England. Until recently, better-designed contemporary housing development was more frequently seen on smaller, more constrained urban or brownfield sites and more rarely on greenfield sites. Set against a significant shift in the prevailing planning regime during the 1990s (from greenfield development to an express policy emphasis on brownfield development), this paper attempts to explain this observation. Utilizing the concept of ‘opportunity space’, it develops a model of the role of design and the designer in the development process, which is then used to account for differences in the quality of development on greenfield and brownfield sites. It is suggested that the development of greenfield and brownfield sites displays significant contrasts and that, as a consequence, successful brownfield developers yield opportunity space in their business strategies to designers.",
    author = "Tiesdell, {Steven Alan} and David Adams",
    year = "2004",
    doi = "10.1080/1357480042000187695",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "23--45",
    journal = "Journal of Urban Design",
    issn = "1357-4809",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Design Matters

    T2 - Major house builders and the design challenge of brownfield housing

    AU - Tiesdell, Steven Alan

    AU - Adams, David

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - The quality of contemporary residential development, and the associated design challenge for house builders, are important current policy issues in England. Until recently, better-designed contemporary housing development was more frequently seen on smaller, more constrained urban or brownfield sites and more rarely on greenfield sites. Set against a significant shift in the prevailing planning regime during the 1990s (from greenfield development to an express policy emphasis on brownfield development), this paper attempts to explain this observation. Utilizing the concept of ‘opportunity space’, it develops a model of the role of design and the designer in the development process, which is then used to account for differences in the quality of development on greenfield and brownfield sites. It is suggested that the development of greenfield and brownfield sites displays significant contrasts and that, as a consequence, successful brownfield developers yield opportunity space in their business strategies to designers.

    AB - The quality of contemporary residential development, and the associated design challenge for house builders, are important current policy issues in England. Until recently, better-designed contemporary housing development was more frequently seen on smaller, more constrained urban or brownfield sites and more rarely on greenfield sites. Set against a significant shift in the prevailing planning regime during the 1990s (from greenfield development to an express policy emphasis on brownfield development), this paper attempts to explain this observation. Utilizing the concept of ‘opportunity space’, it develops a model of the role of design and the designer in the development process, which is then used to account for differences in the quality of development on greenfield and brownfield sites. It is suggested that the development of greenfield and brownfield sites displays significant contrasts and that, as a consequence, successful brownfield developers yield opportunity space in their business strategies to designers.

    U2 - 10.1080/1357480042000187695

    DO - 10.1080/1357480042000187695

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 23

    EP - 45

    JO - Journal of Urban Design

    JF - Journal of Urban Design

    SN - 1357-4809

    IS - 1

    ER -