Detecting between-individual differences in hind-foot length in populations of wild mammals

J. G. A. Martin, M. Festa-Bianchet, S. D. Côté, D. T. Blumstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Hind-foot length is a widely used index of skeletal size in population ecology. The accuracy of hind-foot measurements, however, has not been estimated. We quantified measurement error in adult hind-foot length in yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris (Audubon and Bachman, 1841)), mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus (de Blainville, 1816)), and bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis Shaw, 1804) from long-term capture–recapture studies. Fitting a linear mixed effect model for each species separately, we found that hind-foot length was significantly repeatable in the three species, but repeatability was low, ranging from 0.30 to 0.47. Measurement error explained 53%–66% of the variance in foot length. Differences of 6, 13, and 27 mm would be indistinguishable from measurement error for marmots, goats, and sheep, respectively. At least 4–6 measures per individual were needed to detect variation in foot length between individuals of a population using a mixed effect model. Researchers should strive to limit measurement errors because inaccurate measures may obscure important biological patterns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-123
Number of pages6
JournalCanadian Journal Of Zoology/Revue Canadien De Zoologie
Volume91
Issue number3
Early online date24 Jan 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2013

Fingerprint

goat
sheep
mammal
mammals
Marmota
population ecology
Oreamnos americanus
Ovis canadensis
mountain
repeatability
effect
researchers
goats
index

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • repeatability
  • yellow-bellied marmot
  • mountain goat
  • bighorn sheep

Cite this

Detecting between-individual differences in hind-foot length in populations of wild mammals. / Martin, J. G. A.; Festa-Bianchet, M.; Côté, S. D.; Blumstein, D. T.

In: Canadian Journal Of Zoology/Revue Canadien De Zoologie, Vol. 91, No. 3, 01.03.2013, p. 118-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martin, J. G. A. ; Festa-Bianchet, M. ; Côté, S. D. ; Blumstein, D. T. / Detecting between-individual differences in hind-foot length in populations of wild mammals. In: Canadian Journal Of Zoology/Revue Canadien De Zoologie. 2013 ; Vol. 91, No. 3. pp. 118-123.
@article{0c51f75513a54bb59d891c8e97ebf460,
title = "Detecting between-individual differences in hind-foot length in populations of wild mammals",
abstract = "Hind-foot length is a widely used index of skeletal size in population ecology. The accuracy of hind-foot measurements, however, has not been estimated. We quantified measurement error in adult hind-foot length in yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris (Audubon and Bachman, 1841)), mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus (de Blainville, 1816)), and bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis Shaw, 1804) from long-term capture–recapture studies. Fitting a linear mixed effect model for each species separately, we found that hind-foot length was significantly repeatable in the three species, but repeatability was low, ranging from 0.30 to 0.47. Measurement error explained 53{\%}–66{\%} of the variance in foot length. Differences of 6, 13, and 27 mm would be indistinguishable from measurement error for marmots, goats, and sheep, respectively. At least 4–6 measures per individual were needed to detect variation in foot length between individuals of a population using a mixed effect model. Researchers should strive to limit measurement errors because inaccurate measures may obscure important biological patterns.",
keywords = "accuracy, repeatability, yellow-bellied marmot, mountain goat, bighorn sheep",
author = "Martin, {J. G. A.} and M. Festa-Bianchet and C{\^o}t{\'e}, {S. D.} and Blumstein, {D. T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1139/cjz-2012-0210",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "118--123",
journal = "Canadian Journal Of Zoology/Revue Canadien De Zoologie",
issn = "0008-4301",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detecting between-individual differences in hind-foot length in populations of wild mammals

AU - Martin, J. G. A.

AU - Festa-Bianchet, M.

AU - Côté, S. D.

AU - Blumstein, D. T.

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Hind-foot length is a widely used index of skeletal size in population ecology. The accuracy of hind-foot measurements, however, has not been estimated. We quantified measurement error in adult hind-foot length in yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris (Audubon and Bachman, 1841)), mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus (de Blainville, 1816)), and bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis Shaw, 1804) from long-term capture–recapture studies. Fitting a linear mixed effect model for each species separately, we found that hind-foot length was significantly repeatable in the three species, but repeatability was low, ranging from 0.30 to 0.47. Measurement error explained 53%–66% of the variance in foot length. Differences of 6, 13, and 27 mm would be indistinguishable from measurement error for marmots, goats, and sheep, respectively. At least 4–6 measures per individual were needed to detect variation in foot length between individuals of a population using a mixed effect model. Researchers should strive to limit measurement errors because inaccurate measures may obscure important biological patterns.

AB - Hind-foot length is a widely used index of skeletal size in population ecology. The accuracy of hind-foot measurements, however, has not been estimated. We quantified measurement error in adult hind-foot length in yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris (Audubon and Bachman, 1841)), mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus (de Blainville, 1816)), and bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis Shaw, 1804) from long-term capture–recapture studies. Fitting a linear mixed effect model for each species separately, we found that hind-foot length was significantly repeatable in the three species, but repeatability was low, ranging from 0.30 to 0.47. Measurement error explained 53%–66% of the variance in foot length. Differences of 6, 13, and 27 mm would be indistinguishable from measurement error for marmots, goats, and sheep, respectively. At least 4–6 measures per individual were needed to detect variation in foot length between individuals of a population using a mixed effect model. Researchers should strive to limit measurement errors because inaccurate measures may obscure important biological patterns.

KW - accuracy

KW - repeatability

KW - yellow-bellied marmot

KW - mountain goat

KW - bighorn sheep

U2 - 10.1139/cjz-2012-0210

DO - 10.1139/cjz-2012-0210

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 118

EP - 123

JO - Canadian Journal Of Zoology/Revue Canadien De Zoologie

JF - Canadian Journal Of Zoology/Revue Canadien De Zoologie

SN - 0008-4301

IS - 3

ER -