Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs

V T Diaz-Aleman, A Anton, M Gonzalez de la Rosa, Z K Johnson, S McLeod, A Azuara-Blanco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the ability of Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) and Threshold Noiseless Trend (TNT) programs to detect visual-field deterioration. METHODS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma followed for a minimum of 2 years and a minimum of seven reliable visual fields were included. Progression was assessed subjectively by four masked glaucoma experts, and compared with GPA and TNT results. Each case was judged to be stable, deteriorated or suspicious of deterioration RESULTS: A total of 56 eyes of 42 patients were followed with a mean of 7.8 (SD 1.0) tests over an average of 5.5 (1.04) years. Interobserver agreement to detect progression was good (mean kappa = 0.57). Progression was detected in 10-19 eyes by the experts, in six by GPA and in 24 by TNT. Using the consensus expert opinion as the gold standard (four clinicians detected progression), the GPA sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 83%, respectively, while the TNT sensitivity and specificity was 100% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSION: TNT showed greater concordance with the experts than GPA in the detection of visual-field deterioration. GPA showed a high specificity but lower sensitivity, mainly detecting cases of high focality and pronounced mean defect slopes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)322-328
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume93
Issue number3
Early online date11 Jul 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Visual Fields
Glaucoma
Sensitivity and Specificity
Aptitude
Open Angle Glaucoma
Expert Testimony
Consensus

Keywords

  • aged
  • clinical competence
  • computer graphics
  • diagnosis, computer-assisted
  • disease progression
  • female
  • follow-up studies
  • glaucoma, open-angle
  • humans
  • linear models
  • male
  • middle aged
  • observer variation
  • perimetry
  • sensitivity and specificity
  • visual field

Cite this

Diaz-Aleman, V. T., Anton, A., de la Rosa, M. G., Johnson, Z. K., McLeod, S., & Azuara-Blanco, A. (2009). Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 93(3), 322-328. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.136739

Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs. / Diaz-Aleman, V T; Anton, A; de la Rosa, M Gonzalez; Johnson, Z K; McLeod, S; Azuara-Blanco, A.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 93, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 322-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Diaz-Aleman, VT, Anton, A, de la Rosa, MG, Johnson, ZK, McLeod, S & Azuara-Blanco, A 2009, 'Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs', British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 322-328. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.136739
Diaz-Aleman, V T ; Anton, A ; de la Rosa, M Gonzalez ; Johnson, Z K ; McLeod, S ; Azuara-Blanco, A. / Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009 ; Vol. 93, No. 3. pp. 322-328.
@article{a2a846b786c24ac2a986c6e8f7d87d90,
title = "Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: To compare the ability of Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) and Threshold Noiseless Trend (TNT) programs to detect visual-field deterioration. METHODS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma followed for a minimum of 2 years and a minimum of seven reliable visual fields were included. Progression was assessed subjectively by four masked glaucoma experts, and compared with GPA and TNT results. Each case was judged to be stable, deteriorated or suspicious of deterioration RESULTS: A total of 56 eyes of 42 patients were followed with a mean of 7.8 (SD 1.0) tests over an average of 5.5 (1.04) years. Interobserver agreement to detect progression was good (mean kappa = 0.57). Progression was detected in 10-19 eyes by the experts, in six by GPA and in 24 by TNT. Using the consensus expert opinion as the gold standard (four clinicians detected progression), the GPA sensitivity and specificity were 75{\%} and 83{\%}, respectively, while the TNT sensitivity and specificity was 100{\%} and 77{\%}, respectively. CONCLUSION: TNT showed greater concordance with the experts than GPA in the detection of visual-field deterioration. GPA showed a high specificity but lower sensitivity, mainly detecting cases of high focality and pronounced mean defect slopes.",
keywords = "aged, clinical competence, computer graphics, diagnosis, computer-assisted, disease progression, female, follow-up studies, glaucoma, open-angle, humans, linear models, male, middle aged, observer variation, perimetry, sensitivity and specificity, visual field",
author = "Diaz-Aleman, {V T} and A Anton and {de la Rosa}, {M Gonzalez} and Johnson, {Z K} and S McLeod and A Azuara-Blanco",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1136/bjo.2007.136739",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "322--328",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detection of visual-field deterioration by Glaucoma Progression Analysis and Threshold Noiseless Trend programs

AU - Diaz-Aleman, V T

AU - Anton, A

AU - de la Rosa, M Gonzalez

AU - Johnson, Z K

AU - McLeod, S

AU - Azuara-Blanco, A

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - BACKGROUND: To compare the ability of Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) and Threshold Noiseless Trend (TNT) programs to detect visual-field deterioration. METHODS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma followed for a minimum of 2 years and a minimum of seven reliable visual fields were included. Progression was assessed subjectively by four masked glaucoma experts, and compared with GPA and TNT results. Each case was judged to be stable, deteriorated or suspicious of deterioration RESULTS: A total of 56 eyes of 42 patients were followed with a mean of 7.8 (SD 1.0) tests over an average of 5.5 (1.04) years. Interobserver agreement to detect progression was good (mean kappa = 0.57). Progression was detected in 10-19 eyes by the experts, in six by GPA and in 24 by TNT. Using the consensus expert opinion as the gold standard (four clinicians detected progression), the GPA sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 83%, respectively, while the TNT sensitivity and specificity was 100% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSION: TNT showed greater concordance with the experts than GPA in the detection of visual-field deterioration. GPA showed a high specificity but lower sensitivity, mainly detecting cases of high focality and pronounced mean defect slopes.

AB - BACKGROUND: To compare the ability of Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA) and Threshold Noiseless Trend (TNT) programs to detect visual-field deterioration. METHODS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma followed for a minimum of 2 years and a minimum of seven reliable visual fields were included. Progression was assessed subjectively by four masked glaucoma experts, and compared with GPA and TNT results. Each case was judged to be stable, deteriorated or suspicious of deterioration RESULTS: A total of 56 eyes of 42 patients were followed with a mean of 7.8 (SD 1.0) tests over an average of 5.5 (1.04) years. Interobserver agreement to detect progression was good (mean kappa = 0.57). Progression was detected in 10-19 eyes by the experts, in six by GPA and in 24 by TNT. Using the consensus expert opinion as the gold standard (four clinicians detected progression), the GPA sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 83%, respectively, while the TNT sensitivity and specificity was 100% and 77%, respectively. CONCLUSION: TNT showed greater concordance with the experts than GPA in the detection of visual-field deterioration. GPA showed a high specificity but lower sensitivity, mainly detecting cases of high focality and pronounced mean defect slopes.

KW - aged

KW - clinical competence

KW - computer graphics

KW - diagnosis, computer-assisted

KW - disease progression

KW - female

KW - follow-up studies

KW - glaucoma, open-angle

KW - humans

KW - linear models

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - observer variation

KW - perimetry

KW - sensitivity and specificity

KW - visual field

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2007.136739

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2007.136739

M3 - Article

C2 - 18621790

VL - 93

SP - 322

EP - 328

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 3

ER -