Determinants of biased sex ratios and inter-sex costs of reproduction in dioecious tropical forest trees

Simon A. Queenborough, David F. R. P. Burslem, Nancy C. Garwood, Renato Valencia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Estimates of the sex ratio and cost of reproduction in plant populations have implications for resource use by animals, reserve design, and mechanisms of species coexistence, but may be biased unless all potentially reproductive individuals are censused over several flowering seasons. To investigate mechanisms maintaining dioecy in tropical forest trees, we recorded the flowering activity, sexual expression, and reproductive effort of all 2209 potentially reproductive individuals within 16 species of Myristicaceae over 4 years on a large forest plot in Amazonian Ecuador. Female trees invested > 10 times more biomass than males in total reproduction. Flowering sex ratios were male-biased in four species in >= 1 year, and cumulative 4-year sex ratios were male-biased in two species and for the whole family, but different mechanisms were responsible for this in different species. Annual growth rates were equivalent for both sexes, implying that females can compensate for their greater reproductive investment. There was no strict spatial segregation of the sexes, but females were more often associated with specific habitats than males. We conclude that male-biased sex ratios are not manifested uniformly even after exhaustive sampling and that the mechanisms balancing the higher cost of female reproduction are extremely variable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-78
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Botany
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Keywords

  • dioecious
  • investment
  • Myristicaceae
  • reproduction
  • sex-ratio
  • tropical forest
  • Yasuni
  • rican rain-forest
  • siparuna-grandiflora
  • spatial-distribution
  • myristica-insipida
  • flowering plants
  • neotropical tree
  • life-history
  • fruit-set
  • shrub
  • growth

Cite this

Determinants of biased sex ratios and inter-sex costs of reproduction in dioecious tropical forest trees. / Queenborough, Simon A.; Burslem, David F. R. P.; Garwood, Nancy C.; Valencia, Renato.

In: American Journal of Botany, Vol. 94, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 67-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Queenborough, Simon A. ; Burslem, David F. R. P. ; Garwood, Nancy C. ; Valencia, Renato. / Determinants of biased sex ratios and inter-sex costs of reproduction in dioecious tropical forest trees. In: American Journal of Botany. 2007 ; Vol. 94, No. 1. pp. 67-78.
@article{8ce7a727cd094c97ac015569559a6ed4,
title = "Determinants of biased sex ratios and inter-sex costs of reproduction in dioecious tropical forest trees",
abstract = "Estimates of the sex ratio and cost of reproduction in plant populations have implications for resource use by animals, reserve design, and mechanisms of species coexistence, but may be biased unless all potentially reproductive individuals are censused over several flowering seasons. To investigate mechanisms maintaining dioecy in tropical forest trees, we recorded the flowering activity, sexual expression, and reproductive effort of all 2209 potentially reproductive individuals within 16 species of Myristicaceae over 4 years on a large forest plot in Amazonian Ecuador. Female trees invested > 10 times more biomass than males in total reproduction. Flowering sex ratios were male-biased in four species in >= 1 year, and cumulative 4-year sex ratios were male-biased in two species and for the whole family, but different mechanisms were responsible for this in different species. Annual growth rates were equivalent for both sexes, implying that females can compensate for their greater reproductive investment. There was no strict spatial segregation of the sexes, but females were more often associated with specific habitats than males. We conclude that male-biased sex ratios are not manifested uniformly even after exhaustive sampling and that the mechanisms balancing the higher cost of female reproduction are extremely variable.",
keywords = "dioecious, investment, Myristicaceae, reproduction, sex-ratio, tropical forest, Yasuni, rican rain-forest, siparuna-grandiflora, spatial-distribution, myristica-insipida, flowering plants, neotropical tree, life-history, fruit-set, shrub, growth",
author = "Queenborough, {Simon A.} and Burslem, {David F. R. P.} and Garwood, {Nancy C.} and Renato Valencia",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3732/ajb.94.1.67",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "67--78",
journal = "American Journal of Botany",
issn = "0002-9122",
publisher = "Botanical Society of America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determinants of biased sex ratios and inter-sex costs of reproduction in dioecious tropical forest trees

AU - Queenborough, Simon A.

AU - Burslem, David F. R. P.

AU - Garwood, Nancy C.

AU - Valencia, Renato

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Estimates of the sex ratio and cost of reproduction in plant populations have implications for resource use by animals, reserve design, and mechanisms of species coexistence, but may be biased unless all potentially reproductive individuals are censused over several flowering seasons. To investigate mechanisms maintaining dioecy in tropical forest trees, we recorded the flowering activity, sexual expression, and reproductive effort of all 2209 potentially reproductive individuals within 16 species of Myristicaceae over 4 years on a large forest plot in Amazonian Ecuador. Female trees invested > 10 times more biomass than males in total reproduction. Flowering sex ratios were male-biased in four species in >= 1 year, and cumulative 4-year sex ratios were male-biased in two species and for the whole family, but different mechanisms were responsible for this in different species. Annual growth rates were equivalent for both sexes, implying that females can compensate for their greater reproductive investment. There was no strict spatial segregation of the sexes, but females were more often associated with specific habitats than males. We conclude that male-biased sex ratios are not manifested uniformly even after exhaustive sampling and that the mechanisms balancing the higher cost of female reproduction are extremely variable.

AB - Estimates of the sex ratio and cost of reproduction in plant populations have implications for resource use by animals, reserve design, and mechanisms of species coexistence, but may be biased unless all potentially reproductive individuals are censused over several flowering seasons. To investigate mechanisms maintaining dioecy in tropical forest trees, we recorded the flowering activity, sexual expression, and reproductive effort of all 2209 potentially reproductive individuals within 16 species of Myristicaceae over 4 years on a large forest plot in Amazonian Ecuador. Female trees invested > 10 times more biomass than males in total reproduction. Flowering sex ratios were male-biased in four species in >= 1 year, and cumulative 4-year sex ratios were male-biased in two species and for the whole family, but different mechanisms were responsible for this in different species. Annual growth rates were equivalent for both sexes, implying that females can compensate for their greater reproductive investment. There was no strict spatial segregation of the sexes, but females were more often associated with specific habitats than males. We conclude that male-biased sex ratios are not manifested uniformly even after exhaustive sampling and that the mechanisms balancing the higher cost of female reproduction are extremely variable.

KW - dioecious

KW - investment

KW - Myristicaceae

KW - reproduction

KW - sex-ratio

KW - tropical forest

KW - Yasuni

KW - rican rain-forest

KW - siparuna-grandiflora

KW - spatial-distribution

KW - myristica-insipida

KW - flowering plants

KW - neotropical tree

KW - life-history

KW - fruit-set

KW - shrub

KW - growth

U2 - 10.3732/ajb.94.1.67

DO - 10.3732/ajb.94.1.67

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 67

EP - 78

JO - American Journal of Botany

JF - American Journal of Botany

SN - 0002-9122

IS - 1

ER -