(De)Unionisation, Trade Liberalisation and Selection

Catia Montagna, Antonella Nocco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of union bargaining power and trade liberalisation on industry selection are analysed within a two-country heterogeneous-firm model with firm-specific unions and inter-country asymmetries in size and union power. Union bargaining power is shown to have more nuanced effects on efficiency and welfare than what typically suggested by conventional wisdom. Whilst the higher wages resulting from an unfavourable union power differential harm firms’ competitiveness, by reinforcing standard market access mechanisms, they give rise to aggregate demand effects that can act as a catalyst for industry and result in a pro-variety effect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-122
Number of pages32
JournalMetroeconomica
Volume66
Issue number1
Early online date22 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Unionization
Trade liberalization
Industry
Bargaining power
Market access
Wisdom
Heterogeneous firms
Asymmetry
Catalyst
Competitiveness
Aggregate demand
Wages

Keywords

  • Unionization
  • Trade liberalization
  • Competitive selection

Cite this

(De)Unionisation, Trade Liberalisation and Selection. / Montagna, Catia; Nocco, Antonella.

In: Metroeconomica, Vol. 66, No. 1, 28.02.2015, p. 91-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Montagna, Catia ; Nocco, Antonella. / (De)Unionisation, Trade Liberalisation and Selection. In: Metroeconomica. 2015 ; Vol. 66, No. 1. pp. 91-122.
@article{55a69eb79d624f208dc674a8cb6232f8,
title = "(De)Unionisation, Trade Liberalisation and Selection",
abstract = "The effects of union bargaining power and trade liberalisation on industry selection are analysed within a two-country heterogeneous-firm model with firm-specific unions and inter-country asymmetries in size and union power. Union bargaining power is shown to have more nuanced effects on efficiency and welfare than what typically suggested by conventional wisdom. Whilst the higher wages resulting from an unfavourable union power differential harm firms’ competitiveness, by reinforcing standard market access mechanisms, they give rise to aggregate demand effects that can act as a catalyst for industry and result in a pro-variety effect.",
keywords = "Unionization, Trade liberalization, Competitive selection",
author = "Catia Montagna and Antonella Nocco",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1111/meca.12064",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "91--122",
journal = "Metroeconomica",
issn = "0026-1386",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - (De)Unionisation, Trade Liberalisation and Selection

AU - Montagna, Catia

AU - Nocco, Antonella

PY - 2015/2/28

Y1 - 2015/2/28

N2 - The effects of union bargaining power and trade liberalisation on industry selection are analysed within a two-country heterogeneous-firm model with firm-specific unions and inter-country asymmetries in size and union power. Union bargaining power is shown to have more nuanced effects on efficiency and welfare than what typically suggested by conventional wisdom. Whilst the higher wages resulting from an unfavourable union power differential harm firms’ competitiveness, by reinforcing standard market access mechanisms, they give rise to aggregate demand effects that can act as a catalyst for industry and result in a pro-variety effect.

AB - The effects of union bargaining power and trade liberalisation on industry selection are analysed within a two-country heterogeneous-firm model with firm-specific unions and inter-country asymmetries in size and union power. Union bargaining power is shown to have more nuanced effects on efficiency and welfare than what typically suggested by conventional wisdom. Whilst the higher wages resulting from an unfavourable union power differential harm firms’ competitiveness, by reinforcing standard market access mechanisms, they give rise to aggregate demand effects that can act as a catalyst for industry and result in a pro-variety effect.

KW - Unionization

KW - Trade liberalization

KW - Competitive selection

U2 - 10.1111/meca.12064

DO - 10.1111/meca.12064

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 91

EP - 122

JO - Metroeconomica

JF - Metroeconomica

SN - 0026-1386

IS - 1

ER -