Developing a core outcome set for periodontal trials

Thomas J Lamont* (Corresponding Author), Jan E Clarkson, David N J Ricketts, Peter A Heasman, Craig R Ramsay, Katie Gillies

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no agreement which outcomes should be measured when investigating interventions for periodontal diseases. It is difficult to compare or combine studies with different outcomes; resulting in research wastage and uncertainty for patients and healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVE: Develop a core outcome set (COS) relevant to key stakeholders for use in effectiveness trials investigating prevention and management of periodontal diseases.

METHODS: Mixed method study involving literature review; online Delphi Study; and face-to-face consensus meeting.

PARTICIPANTS: Key stakeholders: patients, dentists, hygienist/therapists, periodontists, researchers.

RESULTS: The literature review identified 37 unique outcomes. Delphi round 1: 20 patients and 51 dental professional and researchers prioritised 25 and suggested an additional 11 outcomes. Delphi round 2: from the resulting 36 outcomes, 13 patients and 39 dental professionals and researchers prioritised 22 outcomes. A face-to-face consensus meeting was hosted in Dundee, Scotland by an independent chair. Eight patients and six dental professional and researchers participated. The final COS contains: Probing depths, Quality of life, Quantified levels of gingivitis, Quantified levels of plaque, Tooth loss.

CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of this COS will ensure the results of future effectiveness trials for periodontal diseases are more relevant to patients and dental professionals, reducing research wastage. This could reduce uncertainty for patients and dental professionals by ensuring the evidence used to inform their choices is meaningful to them. It could also strengthen the quality and certainty of the evidence about the relative effectiveness of interventions.

REGISTRATION: COMET Database: http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/265?result=true.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e0254123
Number of pages15
JournalPloS ONE
Volume16
Issue number7
Early online date22 Jul 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all patients and professionals who took part in the Delphi process and face-to-face consensus meeting. We wish to thank Jillian Sutherland, Shirley Bell, Margaret Mooney and Lorna Barnsley for helping to organise the face-to-face consensus meeting. Patient participant recruitment to this study was facilitated by SHARE–the Scottish Health Research Register. SHARE is supported by NHS Research Scotland and the Chief Scientists Office
Funding: TL received research funding for the core outcome set development for the prevention and management of periodontal diseases which was provided by the Tattershall fund, Dundee Dental School. This grant provided funds for the e-Delphi software, SHARE services and the face-to-face consensus meeting travel and catering costs. The funders had no role in study design, data collection
and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing a core outcome set for periodontal trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this