Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts

Rehema M. White, Anke Fischer, Keith Marshall, Justin M. J. Travis, Thomas J. Webb, Salvatore di Falco, Steve M. Redpath, Rene van der Wal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although biodiversity-related conflicts are generally embedded into an ecological, economic and social context, reported studies often focus on only one of these aspects. The practical facilitation of such conflicts typically adopts an equally restricted view. The developing field of biodiversity conflict management is thus fragmented and, due to its generally insular case study approach, lacks theoretical underpinning. We propose a conceptual framework that, while it takes a social scientific viewpoint to reflect the inherently social nature of conflict between humans over natural resources, integrates social, economic and ecological factors to improve the understanding and management of biodiversity-related conflicts. The framework distinguishes between (i) factors that characterise the conflict and shape its dynamics and (ii) indicators that may be used to assess the potential for and severity of a conflict and its development over time. Factors serve to identify the main drivers of a conflict and enable comparison of conflicts over the same issue across sites and communities, as the relative impact of particular factors is likely to vary between cases. indicators, in turn, result from the interplay between factors. They are characterised by different degrees of overtness and include attitudinal, behavioural and outcome-related indices. We show how this framework can serve to analyse conflicts, and how it could be developed further as a basis for modelling approaches. Principles of the framework are illustrated through its application to a specific biodiversity conflict in the Scottish uplands. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-253
Number of pages12
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume26
Issue number2
Early online date23 Feb 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Keywords

  • attitudes
  • conflict
  • biodiversity management
  • Conservation
  • Hunting
  • interdisciplinarity
  • Scottish uplands
  • large carnivore conservation
  • ecosystem management
  • violent conflict
  • hen harriers
  • red grouse
  • resolution
  • allocation
  • resources
  • predation

Cite this

Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts. / White, Rehema M.; Fischer, Anke; Marshall, Keith; Travis, Justin M. J.; Webb, Thomas J.; di Falco, Salvatore; Redpath, Steve M.; van der Wal, Rene.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 242-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

White, Rehema M. ; Fischer, Anke ; Marshall, Keith ; Travis, Justin M. J. ; Webb, Thomas J. ; di Falco, Salvatore ; Redpath, Steve M. ; van der Wal, Rene. / Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts. In: Land Use Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 242-253.
@article{e944a158e0164fd9abafcf58235d70cf,
title = "Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts",
abstract = "Although biodiversity-related conflicts are generally embedded into an ecological, economic and social context, reported studies often focus on only one of these aspects. The practical facilitation of such conflicts typically adopts an equally restricted view. The developing field of biodiversity conflict management is thus fragmented and, due to its generally insular case study approach, lacks theoretical underpinning. We propose a conceptual framework that, while it takes a social scientific viewpoint to reflect the inherently social nature of conflict between humans over natural resources, integrates social, economic and ecological factors to improve the understanding and management of biodiversity-related conflicts. The framework distinguishes between (i) factors that characterise the conflict and shape its dynamics and (ii) indicators that may be used to assess the potential for and severity of a conflict and its development over time. Factors serve to identify the main drivers of a conflict and enable comparison of conflicts over the same issue across sites and communities, as the relative impact of particular factors is likely to vary between cases. indicators, in turn, result from the interplay between factors. They are characterised by different degrees of overtness and include attitudinal, behavioural and outcome-related indices. We show how this framework can serve to analyse conflicts, and how it could be developed further as a basis for modelling approaches. Principles of the framework are illustrated through its application to a specific biodiversity conflict in the Scottish uplands. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "attitudes, conflict, biodiversity management, Conservation, Hunting, interdisciplinarity, Scottish uplands, large carnivore conservation, ecosystem management, violent conflict, hen harriers, red grouse, resolution, allocation, resources, predation",
author = "White, {Rehema M.} and Anke Fischer and Keith Marshall and Travis, {Justin M. J.} and Webb, {Thomas J.} and {di Falco}, Salvatore and Redpath, {Steve M.} and {van der Wal}, Rene",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.005",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "242--253",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts

AU - White, Rehema M.

AU - Fischer, Anke

AU - Marshall, Keith

AU - Travis, Justin M. J.

AU - Webb, Thomas J.

AU - di Falco, Salvatore

AU - Redpath, Steve M.

AU - van der Wal, Rene

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Although biodiversity-related conflicts are generally embedded into an ecological, economic and social context, reported studies often focus on only one of these aspects. The practical facilitation of such conflicts typically adopts an equally restricted view. The developing field of biodiversity conflict management is thus fragmented and, due to its generally insular case study approach, lacks theoretical underpinning. We propose a conceptual framework that, while it takes a social scientific viewpoint to reflect the inherently social nature of conflict between humans over natural resources, integrates social, economic and ecological factors to improve the understanding and management of biodiversity-related conflicts. The framework distinguishes between (i) factors that characterise the conflict and shape its dynamics and (ii) indicators that may be used to assess the potential for and severity of a conflict and its development over time. Factors serve to identify the main drivers of a conflict and enable comparison of conflicts over the same issue across sites and communities, as the relative impact of particular factors is likely to vary between cases. indicators, in turn, result from the interplay between factors. They are characterised by different degrees of overtness and include attitudinal, behavioural and outcome-related indices. We show how this framework can serve to analyse conflicts, and how it could be developed further as a basis for modelling approaches. Principles of the framework are illustrated through its application to a specific biodiversity conflict in the Scottish uplands. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Although biodiversity-related conflicts are generally embedded into an ecological, economic and social context, reported studies often focus on only one of these aspects. The practical facilitation of such conflicts typically adopts an equally restricted view. The developing field of biodiversity conflict management is thus fragmented and, due to its generally insular case study approach, lacks theoretical underpinning. We propose a conceptual framework that, while it takes a social scientific viewpoint to reflect the inherently social nature of conflict between humans over natural resources, integrates social, economic and ecological factors to improve the understanding and management of biodiversity-related conflicts. The framework distinguishes between (i) factors that characterise the conflict and shape its dynamics and (ii) indicators that may be used to assess the potential for and severity of a conflict and its development over time. Factors serve to identify the main drivers of a conflict and enable comparison of conflicts over the same issue across sites and communities, as the relative impact of particular factors is likely to vary between cases. indicators, in turn, result from the interplay between factors. They are characterised by different degrees of overtness and include attitudinal, behavioural and outcome-related indices. We show how this framework can serve to analyse conflicts, and how it could be developed further as a basis for modelling approaches. Principles of the framework are illustrated through its application to a specific biodiversity conflict in the Scottish uplands. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - attitudes

KW - conflict

KW - biodiversity management

KW - Conservation

KW - Hunting

KW - interdisciplinarity

KW - Scottish uplands

KW - large carnivore conservation

KW - ecosystem management

KW - violent conflict

KW - hen harriers

KW - red grouse

KW - resolution

KW - allocation

KW - resources

KW - predation

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.005

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.005

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 242

EP - 253

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

IS - 2

ER -