Development and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale

Maarten C. Eisma, Margaret S. Stroebe, Henk A.W. Schut, Jan van den Bout, Paul A. Boelen, Wolfgang Stroebe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Two different types of ruminative coping, depressive rumination and grief rumination, negatively influence bereavement outcome. Although grief-specific rumination is likely to be relevant in the bereavement context no internationally validated scale to measure grief rumination exists. Therefore, the current contribution aims to validate the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS), a scale developed to measure grief-specific rumination, in an English sample. Psychometric properties of the English UGRS were compared with those in a Dutch sample. 204 British adults (89 % women, 11 % men), bereaved on average 16 months ago, and 316 Dutch adults (88 % women, 12 % men), bereaved on average 12 months ago, filled out online questionnaires. Different types of rumination (grief rumination, brooding, reflection, trait rumination) and symptoms of psychopathology (anxiety, depression, complicated grief) were measured. A correlated five factor model provided the best fit for the UGRS. Multi-group comparisons showed that the factor structures of the English and Dutch version of the UGRS were highly similar across language groups. The UGRS showed excellent reliability. Results further supported the construct, convergent, divergent and concurrent validity of the English UGRS. The psychometric properties of the Dutch UGRS corroborated these findings. The UGRS appears a valid instrument to assess grief-specific rumination in international research and may have potential applicability as a clinical instrument to assess rumination in individuals with problematic grief.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-176
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Volume36
Issue number1
Early online date23 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Grief
Psychometrics
Bereavement
Psychopathology

Keywords

  • rumination
  • scale
  • questionnaire
  • validation
  • grief
  • repetitive thought

Cite this

Eisma, M. C., Stroebe, M. S., Schut, H. A. W., van den Bout, J., Boelen, P. A., & Stroebe, W. (2014). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 36(1), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9377-y

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale. / Eisma, Maarten C.; Stroebe, Margaret S.; Schut, Henk A.W.; van den Bout, Jan; Boelen, Paul A.; Stroebe, Wolfgang.

In: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, Vol. 36, No. 1, 03.2014, p. 165-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eisma, MC, Stroebe, MS, Schut, HAW, van den Bout, J, Boelen, PA & Stroebe, W 2014, 'Development and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale', Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9377-y
Eisma, Maarten C. ; Stroebe, Margaret S. ; Schut, Henk A.W. ; van den Bout, Jan ; Boelen, Paul A. ; Stroebe, Wolfgang. / Development and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale. In: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2014 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 165-176.
@article{9ebf331e290e435ea89eb9b55afd0112,
title = "Development and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale",
abstract = "Two different types of ruminative coping, depressive rumination and grief rumination, negatively influence bereavement outcome. Although grief-specific rumination is likely to be relevant in the bereavement context no internationally validated scale to measure grief rumination exists. Therefore, the current contribution aims to validate the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS), a scale developed to measure grief-specific rumination, in an English sample. Psychometric properties of the English UGRS were compared with those in a Dutch sample. 204 British adults (89 {\%} women, 11 {\%} men), bereaved on average 16 months ago, and 316 Dutch adults (88 {\%} women, 12 {\%} men), bereaved on average 12 months ago, filled out online questionnaires. Different types of rumination (grief rumination, brooding, reflection, trait rumination) and symptoms of psychopathology (anxiety, depression, complicated grief) were measured. A correlated five factor model provided the best fit for the UGRS. Multi-group comparisons showed that the factor structures of the English and Dutch version of the UGRS were highly similar across language groups. The UGRS showed excellent reliability. Results further supported the construct, convergent, divergent and concurrent validity of the English UGRS. The psychometric properties of the Dutch UGRS corroborated these findings. The UGRS appears a valid instrument to assess grief-specific rumination in international research and may have potential applicability as a clinical instrument to assess rumination in individuals with problematic grief.",
keywords = "rumination , scale, questionnaire, validation , grief, repetitive thought",
author = "Eisma, {Maarten C.} and Stroebe, {Margaret S.} and Schut, {Henk A.W.} and {van den Bout}, Jan and Boelen, {Paul A.} and Wolfgang Stroebe",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10862-013-9377-y",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "165--176",
journal = "Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment",
issn = "0882-2689",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and psychometric evaluation of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale

AU - Eisma, Maarten C.

AU - Stroebe, Margaret S.

AU - Schut, Henk A.W.

AU - van den Bout, Jan

AU - Boelen, Paul A.

AU - Stroebe, Wolfgang

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Two different types of ruminative coping, depressive rumination and grief rumination, negatively influence bereavement outcome. Although grief-specific rumination is likely to be relevant in the bereavement context no internationally validated scale to measure grief rumination exists. Therefore, the current contribution aims to validate the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS), a scale developed to measure grief-specific rumination, in an English sample. Psychometric properties of the English UGRS were compared with those in a Dutch sample. 204 British adults (89 % women, 11 % men), bereaved on average 16 months ago, and 316 Dutch adults (88 % women, 12 % men), bereaved on average 12 months ago, filled out online questionnaires. Different types of rumination (grief rumination, brooding, reflection, trait rumination) and symptoms of psychopathology (anxiety, depression, complicated grief) were measured. A correlated five factor model provided the best fit for the UGRS. Multi-group comparisons showed that the factor structures of the English and Dutch version of the UGRS were highly similar across language groups. The UGRS showed excellent reliability. Results further supported the construct, convergent, divergent and concurrent validity of the English UGRS. The psychometric properties of the Dutch UGRS corroborated these findings. The UGRS appears a valid instrument to assess grief-specific rumination in international research and may have potential applicability as a clinical instrument to assess rumination in individuals with problematic grief.

AB - Two different types of ruminative coping, depressive rumination and grief rumination, negatively influence bereavement outcome. Although grief-specific rumination is likely to be relevant in the bereavement context no internationally validated scale to measure grief rumination exists. Therefore, the current contribution aims to validate the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS), a scale developed to measure grief-specific rumination, in an English sample. Psychometric properties of the English UGRS were compared with those in a Dutch sample. 204 British adults (89 % women, 11 % men), bereaved on average 16 months ago, and 316 Dutch adults (88 % women, 12 % men), bereaved on average 12 months ago, filled out online questionnaires. Different types of rumination (grief rumination, brooding, reflection, trait rumination) and symptoms of psychopathology (anxiety, depression, complicated grief) were measured. A correlated five factor model provided the best fit for the UGRS. Multi-group comparisons showed that the factor structures of the English and Dutch version of the UGRS were highly similar across language groups. The UGRS showed excellent reliability. Results further supported the construct, convergent, divergent and concurrent validity of the English UGRS. The psychometric properties of the Dutch UGRS corroborated these findings. The UGRS appears a valid instrument to assess grief-specific rumination in international research and may have potential applicability as a clinical instrument to assess rumination in individuals with problematic grief.

KW - rumination

KW - scale

KW - questionnaire

KW - validation

KW - grief

KW - repetitive thought

U2 - 10.1007/s10862-013-9377-y

DO - 10.1007/s10862-013-9377-y

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 165

EP - 176

JO - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

JF - Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

SN - 0882-2689

IS - 1

ER -