Development of a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two – the neuromotor 5 min exam 2-year-old version (N5E2)

Sayaka Aoki, Keiji Hashimoto, Hidetoshi Mezawa, Yuhei Hatakenaka, Kahoko Yasumitsu-Lovell, Narufumi Suganuma, Philip Wilson, Elisabeth Fernell, Yoko Kamio, Christopher Gillberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective As a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two, we developed the Neuromotor 5 min Exam 2-year-old version (N5E2), which can be easily administered by pediatricians or primary care physicians. In this study, as an initial attempt to  examine the utility of the N5E2, the inter-rater reliability on scoring  for the individual items in this scale was assessed.
Methods The participants of the study were 29 children (aged 1–5 years, mean
age = 2.79) diagnosed with a variety of neuromotor/developmental
disorders/high-risk conditions. Inter-rater reliability was examined on
the following 11 items in the N5E2: (1) Retrieving a rolling ball, (2) Gait, (3) Toe-walking, (4) Asymmetries of posture and/or movement, (5) Age at unsupported walking, (6) Speaking in two-word understandable sentences, (7) Hypotonus, (8) Hypertonus, (9) Eye movement, (10) Vision problem, (11) Hearing problem. The items were administered to children by two pediatricians with different expertise and clinical experience, separately.
Results The results showed that among the eleven items in the N5E2 examined, a high level of agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 4 items, and a moderate
level of agreement (0.40 ≤ κ < 0.60) was found on 5 items. The level of agreement somewhat improved after the dichotomization of the score;
using this format, a high level of rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 6 out of 11 items. The analyses also revealed high inter-rater reliability on the sum score of the 11 items (r = 0.84).
Conclusions The results suggest the possibility that this brief screening tool could be feasible in settings where clinicians’ experience varies, based on its
inter-rater reliability on individual items between the clinicians with different expertise and amount of clinical experiences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-451
Number of pages7
JournalBrain & Development
Volume40
Issue number6
Early online date21 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Child Development
Walking
Toes
Primary Care Physicians
Eye Movements
Posture
Gait
Hearing
Pediatricians

Keywords

  • Neuromotor development
  • Developmental disabilities
  • screening
  • Inter-rater reliability
  • Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS)
  • Young children

Cite this

Development of a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two – the neuromotor 5 min exam 2-year-old version (N5E2). / Aoki, Sayaka; Hashimoto, Keiji; Mezawa, Hidetoshi; Hatakenaka, Yuhei; Yasumitsu-Lovell, Kahoko; Suganuma, Narufumi; Wilson, Philip; Fernell, Elisabeth; Kamio, Yoko; Gillberg, Christopher.

In: Brain & Development, Vol. 40, No. 6, 06.2018, p. 445-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aoki, S, Hashimoto, K, Mezawa, H, Hatakenaka, Y, Yasumitsu-Lovell, K, Suganuma, N, Wilson, P, Fernell, E, Kamio, Y & Gillberg, C 2018, 'Development of a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two – the neuromotor 5 min exam 2-year-old version (N5E2)', Brain & Development, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2018.01.012
Aoki, Sayaka ; Hashimoto, Keiji ; Mezawa, Hidetoshi ; Hatakenaka, Yuhei ; Yasumitsu-Lovell, Kahoko ; Suganuma, Narufumi ; Wilson, Philip ; Fernell, Elisabeth ; Kamio, Yoko ; Gillberg, Christopher. / Development of a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two – the neuromotor 5 min exam 2-year-old version (N5E2). In: Brain & Development. 2018 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 445-451.
@article{1ae4f548c5924794a9bfc609109e377f,
title = "Development of a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two – the neuromotor 5 min exam 2-year-old version (N5E2)",
abstract = "Objective As a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two, we developed the Neuromotor 5 min Exam 2-year-old version (N5E2), which can be easily administered by pediatricians or primary care physicians. In this study, as an initial attempt to  examine the utility of the N5E2, the inter-rater reliability on scoring  for the individual items in this scale was assessed.Methods The participants of the study were 29 children (aged 1–5 years, mean age = 2.79) diagnosed with a variety of neuromotor/developmental disorders/high-risk conditions. Inter-rater reliability was examined on the following 11 items in the N5E2: (1) Retrieving a rolling ball, (2) Gait, (3) Toe-walking, (4) Asymmetries of posture and/or movement, (5) Age at unsupported walking, (6) Speaking in two-word understandable sentences, (7) Hypotonus, (8) Hypertonus, (9) Eye movement, (10) Vision problem, (11) Hearing problem. The items were administered to children by two pediatricians with different expertise and clinical experience, separately.Results The results showed that among the eleven items in the N5E2 examined, a high level of agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 4 items, and a moderate level of agreement (0.40 ≤ κ < 0.60) was found on 5 items. The level of agreement somewhat improved after the dichotomization of the score; using this format, a high level of rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 6 out of 11 items. The analyses also revealed high inter-rater reliability on the sum score of the 11 items (r = 0.84).Conclusions The results suggest the possibility that this brief screening tool could be feasible in settings where clinicians’ experience varies, based on its inter-rater reliability on individual items between the clinicians with different expertise and amount of clinical experiences.",
keywords = "Neuromotor development, Developmental disabilities, screening, Inter-rater reliability, Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS), Young children",
author = "Sayaka Aoki and Keiji Hashimoto and Hidetoshi Mezawa and Yuhei Hatakenaka and Kahoko Yasumitsu-Lovell and Narufumi Suganuma and Philip Wilson and Elisabeth Fernell and Yoko Kamio and Christopher Gillberg",
note = "Acknowledgement This study is a part of the project related to the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) that is conducted and funded by the Ministry of Environment of Japan.",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.braindev.2018.01.012",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "445--451",
journal = "Brain & Development",
issn = "1872-7131",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two – the neuromotor 5 min exam 2-year-old version (N5E2)

AU - Aoki, Sayaka

AU - Hashimoto, Keiji

AU - Mezawa, Hidetoshi

AU - Hatakenaka, Yuhei

AU - Yasumitsu-Lovell, Kahoko

AU - Suganuma, Narufumi

AU - Wilson, Philip

AU - Fernell, Elisabeth

AU - Kamio, Yoko

AU - Gillberg, Christopher

N1 - Acknowledgement This study is a part of the project related to the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) that is conducted and funded by the Ministry of Environment of Japan.

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - Objective As a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two, we developed the Neuromotor 5 min Exam 2-year-old version (N5E2), which can be easily administered by pediatricians or primary care physicians. In this study, as an initial attempt to  examine the utility of the N5E2, the inter-rater reliability on scoring  for the individual items in this scale was assessed.Methods The participants of the study were 29 children (aged 1–5 years, mean age = 2.79) diagnosed with a variety of neuromotor/developmental disorders/high-risk conditions. Inter-rater reliability was examined on the following 11 items in the N5E2: (1) Retrieving a rolling ball, (2) Gait, (3) Toe-walking, (4) Asymmetries of posture and/or movement, (5) Age at unsupported walking, (6) Speaking in two-word understandable sentences, (7) Hypotonus, (8) Hypertonus, (9) Eye movement, (10) Vision problem, (11) Hearing problem. The items were administered to children by two pediatricians with different expertise and clinical experience, separately.Results The results showed that among the eleven items in the N5E2 examined, a high level of agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 4 items, and a moderate level of agreement (0.40 ≤ κ < 0.60) was found on 5 items. The level of agreement somewhat improved after the dichotomization of the score; using this format, a high level of rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 6 out of 11 items. The analyses also revealed high inter-rater reliability on the sum score of the 11 items (r = 0.84).Conclusions The results suggest the possibility that this brief screening tool could be feasible in settings where clinicians’ experience varies, based on its inter-rater reliability on individual items between the clinicians with different expertise and amount of clinical experiences.

AB - Objective As a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two, we developed the Neuromotor 5 min Exam 2-year-old version (N5E2), which can be easily administered by pediatricians or primary care physicians. In this study, as an initial attempt to  examine the utility of the N5E2, the inter-rater reliability on scoring  for the individual items in this scale was assessed.Methods The participants of the study were 29 children (aged 1–5 years, mean age = 2.79) diagnosed with a variety of neuromotor/developmental disorders/high-risk conditions. Inter-rater reliability was examined on the following 11 items in the N5E2: (1) Retrieving a rolling ball, (2) Gait, (3) Toe-walking, (4) Asymmetries of posture and/or movement, (5) Age at unsupported walking, (6) Speaking in two-word understandable sentences, (7) Hypotonus, (8) Hypertonus, (9) Eye movement, (10) Vision problem, (11) Hearing problem. The items were administered to children by two pediatricians with different expertise and clinical experience, separately.Results The results showed that among the eleven items in the N5E2 examined, a high level of agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 4 items, and a moderate level of agreement (0.40 ≤ κ < 0.60) was found on 5 items. The level of agreement somewhat improved after the dichotomization of the score; using this format, a high level of rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 6 out of 11 items. The analyses also revealed high inter-rater reliability on the sum score of the 11 items (r = 0.84).Conclusions The results suggest the possibility that this brief screening tool could be feasible in settings where clinicians’ experience varies, based on its inter-rater reliability on individual items between the clinicians with different expertise and amount of clinical experiences.

KW - Neuromotor development

KW - Developmental disabilities

KW - screening

KW - Inter-rater reliability

KW - Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS)

KW - Young children

U2 - 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.01.012

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 445

EP - 451

JO - Brain & Development

JF - Brain & Development

SN - 1872-7131

IS - 6

ER -