Abstract
Objective As a new screening tool for neuromotor development in children aged two, we developed the Neuromotor 5 min Exam 2-year-old version (N5E2), which can be easily administered by pediatricians or primary care physicians. In this study, as an initial attempt to examine the utility of the N5E2, the inter-rater reliability on scoring for the individual items in this scale was assessed.
Methods The participants of the study were 29 children (aged 1–5 years, mean
age = 2.79) diagnosed with a variety of neuromotor/developmental
disorders/high-risk conditions. Inter-rater reliability was examined on
the following 11 items in the N5E2: (1) Retrieving a rolling ball, (2) Gait, (3) Toe-walking, (4) Asymmetries of posture and/or movement, (5) Age at unsupported walking, (6) Speaking in two-word understandable sentences, (7) Hypotonus, (8) Hypertonus, (9) Eye movement, (10) Vision problem, (11) Hearing problem. The items were administered to children by two pediatricians with different expertise and clinical experience, separately.
Results The results showed that among the eleven items in the N5E2 examined, a high level of agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 4 items, and a moderate
level of agreement (0.40 ≤ κ < 0.60) was found on 5 items. The level of agreement somewhat improved after the dichotomization of the score;
using this format, a high level of rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 6 out of 11 items. The analyses also revealed high inter-rater reliability on the sum score of the 11 items (r = 0.84).
Conclusions The results suggest the possibility that this brief screening tool could be feasible in settings where clinicians’ experience varies, based on its
inter-rater reliability on individual items between the clinicians with different expertise and amount of clinical experiences.
Methods The participants of the study were 29 children (aged 1–5 years, mean
age = 2.79) diagnosed with a variety of neuromotor/developmental
disorders/high-risk conditions. Inter-rater reliability was examined on
the following 11 items in the N5E2: (1) Retrieving a rolling ball, (2) Gait, (3) Toe-walking, (4) Asymmetries of posture and/or movement, (5) Age at unsupported walking, (6) Speaking in two-word understandable sentences, (7) Hypotonus, (8) Hypertonus, (9) Eye movement, (10) Vision problem, (11) Hearing problem. The items were administered to children by two pediatricians with different expertise and clinical experience, separately.
Results The results showed that among the eleven items in the N5E2 examined, a high level of agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 4 items, and a moderate
level of agreement (0.40 ≤ κ < 0.60) was found on 5 items. The level of agreement somewhat improved after the dichotomization of the score;
using this format, a high level of rater agreement (κ ≥ 0.60) was found on 6 out of 11 items. The analyses also revealed high inter-rater reliability on the sum score of the 11 items (r = 0.84).
Conclusions The results suggest the possibility that this brief screening tool could be feasible in settings where clinicians’ experience varies, based on its
inter-rater reliability on individual items between the clinicians with different expertise and amount of clinical experiences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 445-451 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Brain & Development |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 21 Feb 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2018 |
Bibliographical note
AcknowledgementThis study is a part of the project related to the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) that is conducted and funded by the Ministry of Environment of Japan.
Keywords
- Neuromotor development
- Developmental disabilities
- screening
- Inter-rater reliability
- Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS)
- Young children