Devolution and Patient Choice: Policy Rhetoric versus Experience in Practice

S. Peckham, N. Mays, D. Hughes, M. Sanderson, P. Allen, L. Prior, V. Entwistle, A. Thompson, H. Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: market reforms in England have been identified as making a clear distinction between English health policy and health policy in the devolved systems in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Patient choice is a high profile policy in the English National Health Service that constitutes significant changes to the demand side of health care. It is not clear what national differences this has led to regarding implementation of policy. This article presents the findings from a large UK-wide study on the development and implementation of policies related to patient choice of provider. The findings reported here relate specifically to the policy development and organizational implementation of choice in order to examine the impact of devolution on health care policy. Aim: this study examines patient choice of provider across all four countries of the UK to understand the effect of differences in national policies on the organization and service how choice of provider presented to patients. Methods: at the macro-level, we interviewed policymakers and examined policy and guidance documents to analyze the provenance and determinants of national policy in each UK nation. At the Primary Care Trust or Health Board level, we interviewed a range of public and private health service providers to identify the range of referral pathways and where and when choices might be made. Finally, we interviewed ear, nose and throat, and orthopaedics patients to understand how such choices were experienced. Findings: while we found that distinct rhetorical differences were identifiable at a national policy level, these were less visible at the level of service organization and the way choices were provided to patients. Conclusion: historical similarities in both the structure and operation of health care, coupled with common operational objectives around efficient resource use and waiting times, mediate how strategic policy is implemented and experienced in the devolved nations of the UK.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-218
Number of pages20
JournalSocial Policy & Administration
Volume46
Issue number2
Early online date7 Feb 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

devolution
decentralization
rhetoric
health care
health policy
health service
organization
experience
macro level
service provider
development policy
determinants
health services
reform
demand
market
health
resources
policy
policy development

Keywords

  • patient choice
  • devolution
  • health policy

Cite this

Peckham, S., Mays, N., Hughes, D., Sanderson, M., Allen, P., Prior, L., ... Davies, H. (2012). Devolution and Patient Choice: Policy Rhetoric versus Experience in Practice. Social Policy & Administration, 46(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00831.x

Devolution and Patient Choice : Policy Rhetoric versus Experience in Practice. / Peckham, S.; Mays, N.; Hughes, D.; Sanderson, M.; Allen, P.; Prior, L.; Entwistle, V.; Thompson, A.; Davies, H.

In: Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 46, No. 2, 04.2012, p. 199-218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peckham, S, Mays, N, Hughes, D, Sanderson, M, Allen, P, Prior, L, Entwistle, V, Thompson, A & Davies, H 2012, 'Devolution and Patient Choice: Policy Rhetoric versus Experience in Practice', Social Policy & Administration, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00831.x
Peckham, S. ; Mays, N. ; Hughes, D. ; Sanderson, M. ; Allen, P. ; Prior, L. ; Entwistle, V. ; Thompson, A. ; Davies, H. / Devolution and Patient Choice : Policy Rhetoric versus Experience in Practice. In: Social Policy & Administration. 2012 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 199-218.
@article{a98aacb557444914b2a73c83adaa5329,
title = "Devolution and Patient Choice: Policy Rhetoric versus Experience in Practice",
abstract = "Background: market reforms in England have been identified as making a clear distinction between English health policy and health policy in the devolved systems in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Patient choice is a high profile policy in the English National Health Service that constitutes significant changes to the demand side of health care. It is not clear what national differences this has led to regarding implementation of policy. This article presents the findings from a large UK-wide study on the development and implementation of policies related to patient choice of provider. The findings reported here relate specifically to the policy development and organizational implementation of choice in order to examine the impact of devolution on health care policy. Aim: this study examines patient choice of provider across all four countries of the UK to understand the effect of differences in national policies on the organization and service how choice of provider presented to patients. Methods: at the macro-level, we interviewed policymakers and examined policy and guidance documents to analyze the provenance and determinants of national policy in each UK nation. At the Primary Care Trust or Health Board level, we interviewed a range of public and private health service providers to identify the range of referral pathways and where and when choices might be made. Finally, we interviewed ear, nose and throat, and orthopaedics patients to understand how such choices were experienced. Findings: while we found that distinct rhetorical differences were identifiable at a national policy level, these were less visible at the level of service organization and the way choices were provided to patients. Conclusion: historical similarities in both the structure and operation of health care, coupled with common operational objectives around efficient resource use and waiting times, mediate how strategic policy is implemented and experienced in the devolved nations of the UK.",
keywords = "patient choice , devolution, health policy",
author = "S. Peckham and N. Mays and D. Hughes and M. Sanderson and P. Allen and L. Prior and V. Entwistle and A. Thompson and H. Davies",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00831.x",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "199--218",
journal = "Social Policy & Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Devolution and Patient Choice

T2 - Policy Rhetoric versus Experience in Practice

AU - Peckham, S.

AU - Mays, N.

AU - Hughes, D.

AU - Sanderson, M.

AU - Allen, P.

AU - Prior, L.

AU - Entwistle, V.

AU - Thompson, A.

AU - Davies, H.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Background: market reforms in England have been identified as making a clear distinction between English health policy and health policy in the devolved systems in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Patient choice is a high profile policy in the English National Health Service that constitutes significant changes to the demand side of health care. It is not clear what national differences this has led to regarding implementation of policy. This article presents the findings from a large UK-wide study on the development and implementation of policies related to patient choice of provider. The findings reported here relate specifically to the policy development and organizational implementation of choice in order to examine the impact of devolution on health care policy. Aim: this study examines patient choice of provider across all four countries of the UK to understand the effect of differences in national policies on the organization and service how choice of provider presented to patients. Methods: at the macro-level, we interviewed policymakers and examined policy and guidance documents to analyze the provenance and determinants of national policy in each UK nation. At the Primary Care Trust or Health Board level, we interviewed a range of public and private health service providers to identify the range of referral pathways and where and when choices might be made. Finally, we interviewed ear, nose and throat, and orthopaedics patients to understand how such choices were experienced. Findings: while we found that distinct rhetorical differences were identifiable at a national policy level, these were less visible at the level of service organization and the way choices were provided to patients. Conclusion: historical similarities in both the structure and operation of health care, coupled with common operational objectives around efficient resource use and waiting times, mediate how strategic policy is implemented and experienced in the devolved nations of the UK.

AB - Background: market reforms in England have been identified as making a clear distinction between English health policy and health policy in the devolved systems in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Patient choice is a high profile policy in the English National Health Service that constitutes significant changes to the demand side of health care. It is not clear what national differences this has led to regarding implementation of policy. This article presents the findings from a large UK-wide study on the development and implementation of policies related to patient choice of provider. The findings reported here relate specifically to the policy development and organizational implementation of choice in order to examine the impact of devolution on health care policy. Aim: this study examines patient choice of provider across all four countries of the UK to understand the effect of differences in national policies on the organization and service how choice of provider presented to patients. Methods: at the macro-level, we interviewed policymakers and examined policy and guidance documents to analyze the provenance and determinants of national policy in each UK nation. At the Primary Care Trust or Health Board level, we interviewed a range of public and private health service providers to identify the range of referral pathways and where and when choices might be made. Finally, we interviewed ear, nose and throat, and orthopaedics patients to understand how such choices were experienced. Findings: while we found that distinct rhetorical differences were identifiable at a national policy level, these were less visible at the level of service organization and the way choices were provided to patients. Conclusion: historical similarities in both the structure and operation of health care, coupled with common operational objectives around efficient resource use and waiting times, mediate how strategic policy is implemented and experienced in the devolved nations of the UK.

KW - patient choice

KW - devolution

KW - health policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856703184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00831.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00831.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856703184

VL - 46

SP - 199

EP - 218

JO - Social Policy & Administration

JF - Social Policy & Administration

SN - 0144-5596

IS - 2

ER -