Scientific modelling with diagrams

Ulrich E Stegmann

doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02239-0

Scientific modelling with diagrams

Ulrich E Stegmann^* (Corresponding Author)

^*Corresponding author for this work

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Diagrams can serve as representational models in scientific research, yet important questions remain about how they do so. I address some of these questions with a historical case study, in which diagrams were modified extensively in order to elaborate an early hypothesis of protein synthesis. The diagrams’ modelling role relied mainly on two features: diagrams were modified according to syntactic rules, which temporarily replaced physico-chemical reasoning, and diagram-to-target inferences were based on semantic interpretations. I then explore the lessons for the relative roles of syntax, semantics, external marks, and mental images, for justifying diagram-to-target inferences, and for the “artefactual approach” to scientific models.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2675-2694
Number of pages	20
Journal	Synthese
Volume	198
Early online date	13 May 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02239-0
Publication status	Published - Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

An earlier version of this paper was presented at two workshops in 2016 (“Many Methods, One Biology?”, Munich, and “Representing Scientific Results”, Kassel). I thank participants for stimulating discussions. Special thanks to Christian Joas, Tilmann Massey, Robert Meunier, Kärin Nickelsen, and Raphael Scholl. I would also like to acknowledge the helpful comments by three anonymous reviewers. Springer/Nature and Elsevier granted permissions to reproduce copyrighted material.

Data Availability Statement

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-
019-02239-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords

Representational models
Mental images
Notation
Mechanism
Physical models
Syntactic symbol manipulation
George Gamow
Francis Crick
Protein synthesis

Access to Document

10.1007/s11229-019-02239-0Licence: CC BY

Stegmann_S_Scientific_Modelling_Diagrams_VoR
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made
Final published version, 579 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{db3ad1a9d11b4f9c9806f44a03117eca,

title = "Scientific modelling with diagrams",

abstract = "Diagrams can serve as representational models in scientific research, yet important questions remain about how they do so. I address some of these questions with a historical case study, in which diagrams were modified extensively in order to elaborate an early hypothesis of protein synthesis. The diagrams{\textquoteright} modelling role relied mainly on two features: diagrams were modified according to syntactic rules, which temporarily replaced physico-chemical reasoning, and diagram-to-target inferences were based on semantic interpretations. I then explore the lessons for the relative roles of syntax, semantics, external marks, and mental images, for justifying diagram-to-target inferences, and for the “artefactual approach” to scientific models.",

keywords = "Representational models, Mental images, Notation, Mechanism, Physical models, Syntactic symbol manipulation, George Gamow, Francis Crick, Protein synthesis",

author = "Stegmann, {Ulrich E}",

note = "An earlier version of this paper was presented at two workshops in 2016 (“Many Methods, One Biology?”, Munich, and “Representing Scientific Results”, Kassel). I thank participants for stimulating discussions. Special thanks to Christian Joas, Tilmann Massey, Robert Meunier, K{\"a}rin Nickelsen, and Raphael Scholl. I would also like to acknowledge the helpful comments by three anonymous reviewers. Springer/Nature and Elsevier granted permissions to reproduce copyrighted material.",

year = "2021",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s11229-019-02239-0",

language = "English",

volume = "198",

pages = "2675--2694",

journal = "Synthese",

issn = "0039-7857",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific modelling with diagrams

AU - Stegmann, Ulrich E

N1 - An earlier version of this paper was presented at two workshops in 2016 (“Many Methods, One Biology?”, Munich, and “Representing Scientific Results”, Kassel). I thank participants for stimulating discussions. Special thanks to Christian Joas, Tilmann Massey, Robert Meunier, Kärin Nickelsen, and Raphael Scholl. I would also like to acknowledge the helpful comments by three anonymous reviewers. Springer/Nature and Elsevier granted permissions to reproduce copyrighted material.

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

N2 - Diagrams can serve as representational models in scientific research, yet important questions remain about how they do so. I address some of these questions with a historical case study, in which diagrams were modified extensively in order to elaborate an early hypothesis of protein synthesis. The diagrams’ modelling role relied mainly on two features: diagrams were modified according to syntactic rules, which temporarily replaced physico-chemical reasoning, and diagram-to-target inferences were based on semantic interpretations. I then explore the lessons for the relative roles of syntax, semantics, external marks, and mental images, for justifying diagram-to-target inferences, and for the “artefactual approach” to scientific models.

AB - Diagrams can serve as representational models in scientific research, yet important questions remain about how they do so. I address some of these questions with a historical case study, in which diagrams were modified extensively in order to elaborate an early hypothesis of protein synthesis. The diagrams’ modelling role relied mainly on two features: diagrams were modified according to syntactic rules, which temporarily replaced physico-chemical reasoning, and diagram-to-target inferences were based on semantic interpretations. I then explore the lessons for the relative roles of syntax, semantics, external marks, and mental images, for justifying diagram-to-target inferences, and for the “artefactual approach” to scientific models.

KW - Representational models

KW - Mental images

KW - Notation

KW - Mechanism

KW - Physical models

KW - Syntactic symbol manipulation

KW - George Gamow

KW - Francis Crick

KW - Protein synthesis

UR - http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-019-02239-0

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/scientific-modellingwith-diagrams

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-019-02239-0

DO - 10.1007/s11229-019-02239-0

M3 - Article

SN - 0039-7857

VL - 198

SP - 2675

EP - 2694

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

ER -

Scientific modelling with diagrams

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Data Availability Statement

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Ulrich Stegmann

Cite this

Scientific modelling with diagrams

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Data Availability Statement

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Profiles

Ulrich Stegmann

Cite this