Dietary behavior

An interdisciplinary conceptual analysis and taxonomy

F. Marijn Stok* (Corresponding Author), Britta Renner (Corresponding Author), Julia Allan, Heiner Boeing, Regina Ensenauer, Sylvie Issanchou, Eva Kiesswetter, Nanna Lien, Mario Mazzocchi, Pablo Monsivais, Marta Stelmach-Mardas, Dorothee Volkert, Stefan Hoffmann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Dietary behavior encompasses many aspects, terms for which are used inconsistently across different disciplines and research traditions. This hampers communication and comparison across disciplines and impedes the development of a cumulative science. We describe the conceptual analysis of the fuzzy umbrella concept "dietary behavior" and present the development of an interdisciplinary taxonomy of dietary behavior. Methods: A four-phase multi-method approach was employed. Input was provided by 76 scholars involved in an international research project focusing on the determinants of dietary behavior. Input was collected from the scholars via an online mind mapping procedure. After structuring, condensing, and categorizing this input into a compact taxonomy, the result was presented to all scholars, discussed extensively, and adapted. A second revision round was then conducted among a core working group. Results: A total of 145 distinct entries were made in the original mind mapping procedure. The subsequent steps allowed us to reduce and condense the taxonomy into a final product consisting of 34 terms organized into three main categories: Food Choice, Eating Behavior, and Dietary Intake/Nutrition. In a live discussion session attended by 50 of the scholars involved in the development of the taxonomy, it was judged to adequately reflect their input and to be a valid and useful starting point for interdisciplinary understanding and collaboration. Conclusion: The current taxonomy can be used as a tool to facilitate understanding and cooperation between different disciplines investigating dietary behavior, which may contribute to a more successful approach to tackling the complex public health challenges faced by the field. The taxonomy need not be viewed as a final product, but can continue to grow in depth and width as additional experts provide their input.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1689
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Choice Behavior
Feeding Behavior
Research
Public Health
Communication
Food

Keywords

  • Cumulative science
  • Diet
  • Dietary intake
  • Eating behavior
  • Food choice
  • Nutrition
  • Ontology
  • Taxonomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Stok, F. M., Renner, B., Allan, J., Boeing, H., Ensenauer, R., Issanchou, S., ... Hoffmann, S. (2018). Dietary behavior: An interdisciplinary conceptual analysis and taxonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, [1689]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01689

Dietary behavior : An interdisciplinary conceptual analysis and taxonomy. / Stok, F. Marijn (Corresponding Author); Renner, Britta (Corresponding Author); Allan, Julia; Boeing, Heiner; Ensenauer, Regina; Issanchou, Sylvie; Kiesswetter, Eva; Lien, Nanna; Mazzocchi, Mario; Monsivais, Pablo; Stelmach-Mardas, Marta; Volkert, Dorothee; Hoffmann, Stefan.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, 1689, 20.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stok, FM, Renner, B, Allan, J, Boeing, H, Ensenauer, R, Issanchou, S, Kiesswetter, E, Lien, N, Mazzocchi, M, Monsivais, P, Stelmach-Mardas, M, Volkert, D & Hoffmann, S 2018, 'Dietary behavior: An interdisciplinary conceptual analysis and taxonomy', Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, 1689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01689
Stok, F. Marijn ; Renner, Britta ; Allan, Julia ; Boeing, Heiner ; Ensenauer, Regina ; Issanchou, Sylvie ; Kiesswetter, Eva ; Lien, Nanna ; Mazzocchi, Mario ; Monsivais, Pablo ; Stelmach-Mardas, Marta ; Volkert, Dorothee ; Hoffmann, Stefan. / Dietary behavior : An interdisciplinary conceptual analysis and taxonomy. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 9.
@article{ff9ad42e5f164d7fa57ce1c539680d34,
title = "Dietary behavior: An interdisciplinary conceptual analysis and taxonomy",
abstract = "Background: Dietary behavior encompasses many aspects, terms for which are used inconsistently across different disciplines and research traditions. This hampers communication and comparison across disciplines and impedes the development of a cumulative science. We describe the conceptual analysis of the fuzzy umbrella concept {"}dietary behavior{"} and present the development of an interdisciplinary taxonomy of dietary behavior. Methods: A four-phase multi-method approach was employed. Input was provided by 76 scholars involved in an international research project focusing on the determinants of dietary behavior. Input was collected from the scholars via an online mind mapping procedure. After structuring, condensing, and categorizing this input into a compact taxonomy, the result was presented to all scholars, discussed extensively, and adapted. A second revision round was then conducted among a core working group. Results: A total of 145 distinct entries were made in the original mind mapping procedure. The subsequent steps allowed us to reduce and condense the taxonomy into a final product consisting of 34 terms organized into three main categories: Food Choice, Eating Behavior, and Dietary Intake/Nutrition. In a live discussion session attended by 50 of the scholars involved in the development of the taxonomy, it was judged to adequately reflect their input and to be a valid and useful starting point for interdisciplinary understanding and collaboration. Conclusion: The current taxonomy can be used as a tool to facilitate understanding and cooperation between different disciplines investigating dietary behavior, which may contribute to a more successful approach to tackling the complex public health challenges faced by the field. The taxonomy need not be viewed as a final product, but can continue to grow in depth and width as additional experts provide their input.",
keywords = "Cumulative science, Diet, Dietary intake, Eating behavior, Food choice, Nutrition, Ontology, Taxonomy",
author = "Stok, {F. Marijn} and Britta Renner and Julia Allan and Heiner Boeing and Regina Ensenauer and Sylvie Issanchou and Eva Kiesswetter and Nanna Lien and Mario Mazzocchi and Pablo Monsivais and Marta Stelmach-Mardas and Dorothee Volkert and Stefan Hoffmann",
note = "The preparation of this paper was supported by the DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity (DEDIPAC) knowledge hub. This work was supported by the Joint Programming Initiative “Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life.” The funding agencies supporting this work are (in alphabetical order of participating Member State): France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA); Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF); Italy: Ministry of Education, University and Research/Ministry of Agriculture Food and Forestry Policies; Norway: The Research Council of Norway, Division for Society and Health; and The United Kingdom: The Medical Research Council (MRC).",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01689",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dietary behavior

T2 - An interdisciplinary conceptual analysis and taxonomy

AU - Stok, F. Marijn

AU - Renner, Britta

AU - Allan, Julia

AU - Boeing, Heiner

AU - Ensenauer, Regina

AU - Issanchou, Sylvie

AU - Kiesswetter, Eva

AU - Lien, Nanna

AU - Mazzocchi, Mario

AU - Monsivais, Pablo

AU - Stelmach-Mardas, Marta

AU - Volkert, Dorothee

AU - Hoffmann, Stefan

N1 - The preparation of this paper was supported by the DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity (DEDIPAC) knowledge hub. This work was supported by the Joint Programming Initiative “Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life.” The funding agencies supporting this work are (in alphabetical order of participating Member State): France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA); Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF); Italy: Ministry of Education, University and Research/Ministry of Agriculture Food and Forestry Policies; Norway: The Research Council of Norway, Division for Society and Health; and The United Kingdom: The Medical Research Council (MRC).

PY - 2018/9/20

Y1 - 2018/9/20

N2 - Background: Dietary behavior encompasses many aspects, terms for which are used inconsistently across different disciplines and research traditions. This hampers communication and comparison across disciplines and impedes the development of a cumulative science. We describe the conceptual analysis of the fuzzy umbrella concept "dietary behavior" and present the development of an interdisciplinary taxonomy of dietary behavior. Methods: A four-phase multi-method approach was employed. Input was provided by 76 scholars involved in an international research project focusing on the determinants of dietary behavior. Input was collected from the scholars via an online mind mapping procedure. After structuring, condensing, and categorizing this input into a compact taxonomy, the result was presented to all scholars, discussed extensively, and adapted. A second revision round was then conducted among a core working group. Results: A total of 145 distinct entries were made in the original mind mapping procedure. The subsequent steps allowed us to reduce and condense the taxonomy into a final product consisting of 34 terms organized into three main categories: Food Choice, Eating Behavior, and Dietary Intake/Nutrition. In a live discussion session attended by 50 of the scholars involved in the development of the taxonomy, it was judged to adequately reflect their input and to be a valid and useful starting point for interdisciplinary understanding and collaboration. Conclusion: The current taxonomy can be used as a tool to facilitate understanding and cooperation between different disciplines investigating dietary behavior, which may contribute to a more successful approach to tackling the complex public health challenges faced by the field. The taxonomy need not be viewed as a final product, but can continue to grow in depth and width as additional experts provide their input.

AB - Background: Dietary behavior encompasses many aspects, terms for which are used inconsistently across different disciplines and research traditions. This hampers communication and comparison across disciplines and impedes the development of a cumulative science. We describe the conceptual analysis of the fuzzy umbrella concept "dietary behavior" and present the development of an interdisciplinary taxonomy of dietary behavior. Methods: A four-phase multi-method approach was employed. Input was provided by 76 scholars involved in an international research project focusing on the determinants of dietary behavior. Input was collected from the scholars via an online mind mapping procedure. After structuring, condensing, and categorizing this input into a compact taxonomy, the result was presented to all scholars, discussed extensively, and adapted. A second revision round was then conducted among a core working group. Results: A total of 145 distinct entries were made in the original mind mapping procedure. The subsequent steps allowed us to reduce and condense the taxonomy into a final product consisting of 34 terms organized into three main categories: Food Choice, Eating Behavior, and Dietary Intake/Nutrition. In a live discussion session attended by 50 of the scholars involved in the development of the taxonomy, it was judged to adequately reflect their input and to be a valid and useful starting point for interdisciplinary understanding and collaboration. Conclusion: The current taxonomy can be used as a tool to facilitate understanding and cooperation between different disciplines investigating dietary behavior, which may contribute to a more successful approach to tackling the complex public health challenges faced by the field. The taxonomy need not be viewed as a final product, but can continue to grow in depth and width as additional experts provide their input.

KW - Cumulative science

KW - Diet

KW - Dietary intake

KW - Eating behavior

KW - Food choice

KW - Nutrition

KW - Ontology

KW - Taxonomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053678798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01689

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01689

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 1689

ER -