Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression

Neil William Scott, Peter Fayers, Neil K. Aaronson, Andrew Bottomley, Alexander de Graeff, Mogens Groenvold, Chad Gundy, Michael Koller, Morten A. Petersen, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, EORTC Quality Life Grp, Quality Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Differential item functioning (DIF) methods can be used to determine whether different subgroups respond differently to particular items within a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) subscale, after allowing for overall subgroup differences in that scale. This article reviews issues that arise when testing for DIF in HRQoL instruments. We focus on logistic regression methods, which are often used because of their efficiency, simplicity and ease of application.
Methods: A review of logistic regression DIF analyses in HRQoL was undertaken. Methodological articles from other fields and using other DIF methods were also included if considered relevant.
Results: There are many competing approaches for the conduct of DIF analyses and many criteria for determining what constitutes significant DIF. DIF in short scales, as commonly found in HRQL instruments, may be more difficult to interpret. Qualitative methods may aid interpretation of such DIF analyses.
Conclusions: A number of methodological choices must be made when applying logistic regression for DIF analyses, and many of these affect the results. We provide recommendations based on reviewing the current evidence. Although the focus is on logistic regression, many of our results should be applicable to DIF analyses in general. There is a need for more empirical and theoretical work in this area.

Original languageEnglish
Article number81
Number of pages9
JournalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Logistic Models
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • mental-state-examination
  • Mantel-Haenszel procedures
  • cross-cultural validity
  • response theory
  • EORTC QLQ-C30
  • comparing translations
  • measurement invariance
  • depressive symptoms
  • Spanish translation
  • measurement bias

Cite this

Scott, N. W., Fayers, P., Aaronson, N. K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., ... EORTC Quality Life Grp, Quality Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group (2010). Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, [81]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-81

Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. / Scott, Neil William; Fayers, Peter; Aaronson, Neil K.; Bottomley, Andrew; de Graeff, Alexander; Groenvold, Mogens; Gundy, Chad; Koller, Michael; Petersen, Morten A.; Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.; EORTC Quality Life Grp, Quality Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group.

In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol. 8, 81, 04.08.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, NW, Fayers, P, Aaronson, NK, Bottomley, A, de Graeff, A, Groenvold, M, Gundy, C, Koller, M, Petersen, MA, Sprangers, MAG & EORTC Quality Life Grp, Quality Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group 2010, 'Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression', Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 8, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-81
Scott, Neil William ; Fayers, Peter ; Aaronson, Neil K. ; Bottomley, Andrew ; de Graeff, Alexander ; Groenvold, Mogens ; Gundy, Chad ; Koller, Michael ; Petersen, Morten A. ; Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. ; EORTC Quality Life Grp, Quality Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group. / Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2010 ; Vol. 8.
@article{724b80c9ced54aca8e162ea2457a4e41,
title = "Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression",
abstract = "Background: Differential item functioning (DIF) methods can be used to determine whether different subgroups respond differently to particular items within a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) subscale, after allowing for overall subgroup differences in that scale. This article reviews issues that arise when testing for DIF in HRQoL instruments. We focus on logistic regression methods, which are often used because of their efficiency, simplicity and ease of application. Methods: A review of logistic regression DIF analyses in HRQoL was undertaken. Methodological articles from other fields and using other DIF methods were also included if considered relevant. Results: There are many competing approaches for the conduct of DIF analyses and many criteria for determining what constitutes significant DIF. DIF in short scales, as commonly found in HRQL instruments, may be more difficult to interpret. Qualitative methods may aid interpretation of such DIF analyses. Conclusions: A number of methodological choices must be made when applying logistic regression for DIF analyses, and many of these affect the results. We provide recommendations based on reviewing the current evidence. Although the focus is on logistic regression, many of our results should be applicable to DIF analyses in general. There is a need for more empirical and theoretical work in this area.",
keywords = "mental-state-examination, Mantel-Haenszel procedures, cross-cultural validity, response theory, EORTC QLQ-C30, comparing translations, measurement invariance, depressive symptoms, Spanish translation, measurement bias",
author = "Scott, {Neil William} and Peter Fayers and Aaronson, {Neil K.} and Andrew Bottomley and {de Graeff}, Alexander and Mogens Groenvold and Chad Gundy and Michael Koller and Petersen, {Morten A.} and Sprangers, {Mirjam A. G.} and {EORTC Quality Life Grp, Quality Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1186/1477-7525-8-81",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Health and Quality of Life Outcomes",
issn = "1477-7525",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression

AU - Scott, Neil William

AU - Fayers, Peter

AU - Aaronson, Neil K.

AU - Bottomley, Andrew

AU - de Graeff, Alexander

AU - Groenvold, Mogens

AU - Gundy, Chad

AU - Koller, Michael

AU - Petersen, Morten A.

AU - Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.

AU - EORTC Quality Life Grp, Quality Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group

PY - 2010/8/4

Y1 - 2010/8/4

N2 - Background: Differential item functioning (DIF) methods can be used to determine whether different subgroups respond differently to particular items within a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) subscale, after allowing for overall subgroup differences in that scale. This article reviews issues that arise when testing for DIF in HRQoL instruments. We focus on logistic regression methods, which are often used because of their efficiency, simplicity and ease of application. Methods: A review of logistic regression DIF analyses in HRQoL was undertaken. Methodological articles from other fields and using other DIF methods were also included if considered relevant. Results: There are many competing approaches for the conduct of DIF analyses and many criteria for determining what constitutes significant DIF. DIF in short scales, as commonly found in HRQL instruments, may be more difficult to interpret. Qualitative methods may aid interpretation of such DIF analyses. Conclusions: A number of methodological choices must be made when applying logistic regression for DIF analyses, and many of these affect the results. We provide recommendations based on reviewing the current evidence. Although the focus is on logistic regression, many of our results should be applicable to DIF analyses in general. There is a need for more empirical and theoretical work in this area.

AB - Background: Differential item functioning (DIF) methods can be used to determine whether different subgroups respond differently to particular items within a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) subscale, after allowing for overall subgroup differences in that scale. This article reviews issues that arise when testing for DIF in HRQoL instruments. We focus on logistic regression methods, which are often used because of their efficiency, simplicity and ease of application. Methods: A review of logistic regression DIF analyses in HRQoL was undertaken. Methodological articles from other fields and using other DIF methods were also included if considered relevant. Results: There are many competing approaches for the conduct of DIF analyses and many criteria for determining what constitutes significant DIF. DIF in short scales, as commonly found in HRQL instruments, may be more difficult to interpret. Qualitative methods may aid interpretation of such DIF analyses. Conclusions: A number of methodological choices must be made when applying logistic regression for DIF analyses, and many of these affect the results. We provide recommendations based on reviewing the current evidence. Although the focus is on logistic regression, many of our results should be applicable to DIF analyses in general. There is a need for more empirical and theoretical work in this area.

KW - mental-state-examination

KW - Mantel-Haenszel procedures

KW - cross-cultural validity

KW - response theory

KW - EORTC QLQ-C30

KW - comparing translations

KW - measurement invariance

KW - depressive symptoms

KW - Spanish translation

KW - measurement bias

U2 - 10.1186/1477-7525-8-81

DO - 10.1186/1477-7525-8-81

M3 - Article

C2 - 20684767

VL - 8

JO - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

JF - Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

SN - 1477-7525

M1 - 81

ER -