Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30: a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data

Neil William Scott, Peter Fayers, Neil K. Aaronson, Andrew Bottomley, Alexander de Graeff, Mogens Groenvold, Chad Gundy, Michael Koller, Morten A. Petersen, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers, on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses can be used to explore translation, cultural, gender or other differences in the performance of quality of life (QoL) instruments. These analyses are commonly performed using "baseline" or pretreatment data. We previously reported DIF analyses to examine the pattern of item responses for translations of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 QoL instrument, using only data collected prior to cancer treatment. We now compare the consistency of these results with similar analyses of on-treatment and off-treatment assessments and explore whether item relationships differ from those at baseline.

Methods Logistic regression DIF analyses were used to examine the translation of each item in each multi-item scale at the three time points, after controlling for the overall scale score and other covariates. The consistency of results at the three time points was explored.

Results For most EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the DIF results were very consistent across the three time points. Results for the Nausea and Vomiting scale varied the most across assessments.

Discussion The results indicated that DIF analyses were stable across each time point and that the same DIF effects were usually found regardless of the treatment status of the respondent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-388
Number of pages8
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume18
Issue number3
Early online date27 Feb 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Keywords

  • Differential item functioning
  • EORTC QLQ-C30
  • Pretreatment
  • On-treatment
  • Off-treatment
  • health applications

Cite this

Scott, N. W., Fayers, P., Aaronson, N. K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., ... on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group (2009). Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30: a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data. Quality of Life Research, 18(3), 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9453-7

Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30 : a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data. / Scott, Neil William; Fayers, Peter; Aaronson, Neil K.; Bottomley, Andrew; de Graeff, Alexander; Groenvold, Mogens; Gundy, Chad; Koller, Michael; Petersen, Morten A.; Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.; on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 04.2009, p. 381-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, NW, Fayers, P, Aaronson, NK, Bottomley, A, de Graeff, A, Groenvold, M, Gundy, C, Koller, M, Petersen, MA, Sprangers, MAG & on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group 2009, 'Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30: a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data', Quality of Life Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9453-7
Scott, Neil William ; Fayers, Peter ; Aaronson, Neil K. ; Bottomley, Andrew ; de Graeff, Alexander ; Groenvold, Mogens ; Gundy, Chad ; Koller, Michael ; Petersen, Morten A. ; Sprangers, Mirjam A. G. ; on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group. / Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30 : a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data. In: Quality of Life Research. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 381-388.
@article{e3dfe9d7be3f4d2e9e024987e1e7e406,
title = "Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30: a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data",
abstract = "Introduction Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses can be used to explore translation, cultural, gender or other differences in the performance of quality of life (QoL) instruments. These analyses are commonly performed using {"}baseline{"} or pretreatment data. We previously reported DIF analyses to examine the pattern of item responses for translations of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 QoL instrument, using only data collected prior to cancer treatment. We now compare the consistency of these results with similar analyses of on-treatment and off-treatment assessments and explore whether item relationships differ from those at baseline.Methods Logistic regression DIF analyses were used to examine the translation of each item in each multi-item scale at the three time points, after controlling for the overall scale score and other covariates. The consistency of results at the three time points was explored.Results For most EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the DIF results were very consistent across the three time points. Results for the Nausea and Vomiting scale varied the most across assessments.Discussion The results indicated that DIF analyses were stable across each time point and that the same DIF effects were usually found regardless of the treatment status of the respondent.",
keywords = "Differential item functioning, EORTC QLQ-C30, Pretreatment, On-treatment, Off-treatment, health applications",
author = "Scott, {Neil William} and Peter Fayers and Aaronson, {Neil K.} and Andrew Bottomley and {de Graeff}, Alexander and Mogens Groenvold and Chad Gundy and Michael Koller and Petersen, {Morten A.} and Sprangers, {Mirjam A. G.} and {on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group}",
note = "Acknowledgements This work was funded by the EORTC Quality of Life Group, Cancer Research UK and the University of Aberdeen and carried out under the auspices of the EORTC Quality of Life Group",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-009-9453-7",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "381--388",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30

T2 - a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data

AU - Scott, Neil William

AU - Fayers, Peter

AU - Aaronson, Neil K.

AU - Bottomley, Andrew

AU - de Graeff, Alexander

AU - Groenvold, Mogens

AU - Gundy, Chad

AU - Koller, Michael

AU - Petersen, Morten A.

AU - Sprangers, Mirjam A. G.

AU - on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis Group

N1 - Acknowledgements This work was funded by the EORTC Quality of Life Group, Cancer Research UK and the University of Aberdeen and carried out under the auspices of the EORTC Quality of Life Group

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Introduction Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses can be used to explore translation, cultural, gender or other differences in the performance of quality of life (QoL) instruments. These analyses are commonly performed using "baseline" or pretreatment data. We previously reported DIF analyses to examine the pattern of item responses for translations of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 QoL instrument, using only data collected prior to cancer treatment. We now compare the consistency of these results with similar analyses of on-treatment and off-treatment assessments and explore whether item relationships differ from those at baseline.Methods Logistic regression DIF analyses were used to examine the translation of each item in each multi-item scale at the three time points, after controlling for the overall scale score and other covariates. The consistency of results at the three time points was explored.Results For most EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the DIF results were very consistent across the three time points. Results for the Nausea and Vomiting scale varied the most across assessments.Discussion The results indicated that DIF analyses were stable across each time point and that the same DIF effects were usually found regardless of the treatment status of the respondent.

AB - Introduction Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses can be used to explore translation, cultural, gender or other differences in the performance of quality of life (QoL) instruments. These analyses are commonly performed using "baseline" or pretreatment data. We previously reported DIF analyses to examine the pattern of item responses for translations of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 QoL instrument, using only data collected prior to cancer treatment. We now compare the consistency of these results with similar analyses of on-treatment and off-treatment assessments and explore whether item relationships differ from those at baseline.Methods Logistic regression DIF analyses were used to examine the translation of each item in each multi-item scale at the three time points, after controlling for the overall scale score and other covariates. The consistency of results at the three time points was explored.Results For most EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, the DIF results were very consistent across the three time points. Results for the Nausea and Vomiting scale varied the most across assessments.Discussion The results indicated that DIF analyses were stable across each time point and that the same DIF effects were usually found regardless of the treatment status of the respondent.

KW - Differential item functioning

KW - EORTC QLQ-C30

KW - Pretreatment

KW - On-treatment

KW - Off-treatment

KW - health applications

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-009-9453-7

DO - 10.1007/s11136-009-9453-7

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 381

EP - 388

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 3

ER -