Directed remembering: Subliminal cues alter nonconscious memory strategies

J. P. Mitchell, Neil Macrae, J. W. Schooler, Alan Berkeley Milne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much research on memory function has focused on changes in recognition performance brought about by differences in the processes engaged during encoding. In most of this work, participants either receive explicit instructions to remember particular items or they perform orienting (i.e., encoding) tasks that support different levels of memory performance. In daily life, however, the retention or dismissal of information often occurs without conscious intent, thereby suggesting an alternative, nonconscious route through which purposive remembering and forgetting can occur. Based on this line of reasoning, we speculated that recognition performance in a standard item-based forgetting paradigm may be moderated by subliminal cues that trigger the automatic activation of different mnemonic strategies. We report the results of two experiments that supported this prediction. In each experiment, the basic item-based forgetting effect was replicated, but via the subliminal presentation of "remember'' and "forget'' cues. In addition, cue-dependent differences in memory performance were traced to the operation of a covert rehearsal mechanism during encoding. We consider the implications of these findings for the nonconscious operation of memory processes in everyday life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-388
Number of pages7
JournalMemory
Volume10
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • impression-formation
  • brain activity
  • automaticity
  • cognition
  • tests

Cite this

Directed remembering: Subliminal cues alter nonconscious memory strategies. / Mitchell, J. P.; Macrae, Neil; Schooler, J. W.; Milne, Alan Berkeley.

In: Memory , Vol. 10, No. 5-6, 2002, p. 381-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitchell, J. P. ; Macrae, Neil ; Schooler, J. W. ; Milne, Alan Berkeley. / Directed remembering: Subliminal cues alter nonconscious memory strategies. In: Memory . 2002 ; Vol. 10, No. 5-6. pp. 381-388.
@article{4f9c7cd4710e4df0b0af2fe24bdba631,
title = "Directed remembering: Subliminal cues alter nonconscious memory strategies",
abstract = "Much research on memory function has focused on changes in recognition performance brought about by differences in the processes engaged during encoding. In most of this work, participants either receive explicit instructions to remember particular items or they perform orienting (i.e., encoding) tasks that support different levels of memory performance. In daily life, however, the retention or dismissal of information often occurs without conscious intent, thereby suggesting an alternative, nonconscious route through which purposive remembering and forgetting can occur. Based on this line of reasoning, we speculated that recognition performance in a standard item-based forgetting paradigm may be moderated by subliminal cues that trigger the automatic activation of different mnemonic strategies. We report the results of two experiments that supported this prediction. In each experiment, the basic item-based forgetting effect was replicated, but via the subliminal presentation of {"}remember'' and {"}forget'' cues. In addition, cue-dependent differences in memory performance were traced to the operation of a covert rehearsal mechanism during encoding. We consider the implications of these findings for the nonconscious operation of memory processes in everyday life.",
keywords = "impression-formation, brain activity, automaticity, cognition, tests",
author = "Mitchell, {J. P.} and Neil Macrae and Schooler, {J. W.} and Milne, {Alan Berkeley}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1080/09658210244000207",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "381--388",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Directed remembering: Subliminal cues alter nonconscious memory strategies

AU - Mitchell, J. P.

AU - Macrae, Neil

AU - Schooler, J. W.

AU - Milne, Alan Berkeley

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Much research on memory function has focused on changes in recognition performance brought about by differences in the processes engaged during encoding. In most of this work, participants either receive explicit instructions to remember particular items or they perform orienting (i.e., encoding) tasks that support different levels of memory performance. In daily life, however, the retention or dismissal of information often occurs without conscious intent, thereby suggesting an alternative, nonconscious route through which purposive remembering and forgetting can occur. Based on this line of reasoning, we speculated that recognition performance in a standard item-based forgetting paradigm may be moderated by subliminal cues that trigger the automatic activation of different mnemonic strategies. We report the results of two experiments that supported this prediction. In each experiment, the basic item-based forgetting effect was replicated, but via the subliminal presentation of "remember'' and "forget'' cues. In addition, cue-dependent differences in memory performance were traced to the operation of a covert rehearsal mechanism during encoding. We consider the implications of these findings for the nonconscious operation of memory processes in everyday life.

AB - Much research on memory function has focused on changes in recognition performance brought about by differences in the processes engaged during encoding. In most of this work, participants either receive explicit instructions to remember particular items or they perform orienting (i.e., encoding) tasks that support different levels of memory performance. In daily life, however, the retention or dismissal of information often occurs without conscious intent, thereby suggesting an alternative, nonconscious route through which purposive remembering and forgetting can occur. Based on this line of reasoning, we speculated that recognition performance in a standard item-based forgetting paradigm may be moderated by subliminal cues that trigger the automatic activation of different mnemonic strategies. We report the results of two experiments that supported this prediction. In each experiment, the basic item-based forgetting effect was replicated, but via the subliminal presentation of "remember'' and "forget'' cues. In addition, cue-dependent differences in memory performance were traced to the operation of a covert rehearsal mechanism during encoding. We consider the implications of these findings for the nonconscious operation of memory processes in everyday life.

KW - impression-formation

KW - brain activity

KW - automaticity

KW - cognition

KW - tests

U2 - 10.1080/09658210244000207

DO - 10.1080/09658210244000207

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 381

EP - 388

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 5-6

ER -