Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes

Sara Spotorno, George L Malcolm, Benjamin W Tatler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that correctly placed objects facilitate eye guidance, but also that objects violating spatial associations within scenes may be prioritized for selection and subsequent inspection. We analyzed the respective eye guidance of spatial expectations and target template (precise picture or verbal label) in visual search, while taking into account any impact of object spatial inconsistency on extrafoveal or foveal processing. Moreover, we isolated search disruption due to misleading spatial expectations about the target from the influence of spatial inconsistency within the scene upon search behavior. Reliable spatial expectations and precise target template improved oculomotor efficiency across all search phases. Spatial inconsistency resulted in preferential saccadic selection when guidance by template was insufficient to ensure effective search from the outset and the misplaced object was bigger than the objects consistently placed in the same scene region. This prioritization emerged principally during early inspection of the region, but the inconsistent object also tended to be preferentially fixated overall across region viewing. These results suggest that objects are first selected covertly on the basis of their relative size and that subsequent overt selection is made considering object-context associations processed in extrafoveal vision. Once the object was fixated, inconsistency resulted in longer first fixation duration and longer total dwell time. As a whole, our findings indicate that observed impairment of oculomotor behavior when searching for an implausibly placed target is the combined product of disruption due to unreliable spatial expectations and prioritization of inconsistent objects before and during object fixation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Appetitive Behavior
Research

Keywords

  • Eye guidance
  • Visual cognition
  • Spatial expectations
  • Spatial inconsistency

Cite this

Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes. / Spotorno, Sara; Malcolm, George L; Tatler, Benjamin W.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 15, No. 2, 02.2015, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aad67022389e4431a26fce36ee8067c5,
title = "Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes",
abstract = "Previous research has suggested that correctly placed objects facilitate eye guidance, but also that objects violating spatial associations within scenes may be prioritized for selection and subsequent inspection. We analyzed the respective eye guidance of spatial expectations and target template (precise picture or verbal label) in visual search, while taking into account any impact of object spatial inconsistency on extrafoveal or foveal processing. Moreover, we isolated search disruption due to misleading spatial expectations about the target from the influence of spatial inconsistency within the scene upon search behavior. Reliable spatial expectations and precise target template improved oculomotor efficiency across all search phases. Spatial inconsistency resulted in preferential saccadic selection when guidance by template was insufficient to ensure effective search from the outset and the misplaced object was bigger than the objects consistently placed in the same scene region. This prioritization emerged principally during early inspection of the region, but the inconsistent object also tended to be preferentially fixated overall across region viewing. These results suggest that objects are first selected covertly on the basis of their relative size and that subsequent overt selection is made considering object-context associations processed in extrafoveal vision. Once the object was fixated, inconsistency resulted in longer first fixation duration and longer total dwell time. As a whole, our findings indicate that observed impairment of oculomotor behavior when searching for an implausibly placed target is the combined product of disruption due to unreliable spatial expectations and prioritization of inconsistent objects before and during object fixation.",
keywords = "Eye guidance, Visual cognition, Spatial expectations, Spatial inconsistency",
author = "Sara Spotorno and Malcolm, {George L} and Tatler, {Benjamin W}",
note = "{\circledC} 2015 ARVO. Acknowledgments This research was funded by ESRC grant RES-000-22-4098 to BWT.",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1167/15.2.12",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes

AU - Spotorno, Sara

AU - Malcolm, George L

AU - Tatler, Benjamin W

N1 - © 2015 ARVO. Acknowledgments This research was funded by ESRC grant RES-000-22-4098 to BWT.

PY - 2015/2

Y1 - 2015/2

N2 - Previous research has suggested that correctly placed objects facilitate eye guidance, but also that objects violating spatial associations within scenes may be prioritized for selection and subsequent inspection. We analyzed the respective eye guidance of spatial expectations and target template (precise picture or verbal label) in visual search, while taking into account any impact of object spatial inconsistency on extrafoveal or foveal processing. Moreover, we isolated search disruption due to misleading spatial expectations about the target from the influence of spatial inconsistency within the scene upon search behavior. Reliable spatial expectations and precise target template improved oculomotor efficiency across all search phases. Spatial inconsistency resulted in preferential saccadic selection when guidance by template was insufficient to ensure effective search from the outset and the misplaced object was bigger than the objects consistently placed in the same scene region. This prioritization emerged principally during early inspection of the region, but the inconsistent object also tended to be preferentially fixated overall across region viewing. These results suggest that objects are first selected covertly on the basis of their relative size and that subsequent overt selection is made considering object-context associations processed in extrafoveal vision. Once the object was fixated, inconsistency resulted in longer first fixation duration and longer total dwell time. As a whole, our findings indicate that observed impairment of oculomotor behavior when searching for an implausibly placed target is the combined product of disruption due to unreliable spatial expectations and prioritization of inconsistent objects before and during object fixation.

AB - Previous research has suggested that correctly placed objects facilitate eye guidance, but also that objects violating spatial associations within scenes may be prioritized for selection and subsequent inspection. We analyzed the respective eye guidance of spatial expectations and target template (precise picture or verbal label) in visual search, while taking into account any impact of object spatial inconsistency on extrafoveal or foveal processing. Moreover, we isolated search disruption due to misleading spatial expectations about the target from the influence of spatial inconsistency within the scene upon search behavior. Reliable spatial expectations and precise target template improved oculomotor efficiency across all search phases. Spatial inconsistency resulted in preferential saccadic selection when guidance by template was insufficient to ensure effective search from the outset and the misplaced object was bigger than the objects consistently placed in the same scene region. This prioritization emerged principally during early inspection of the region, but the inconsistent object also tended to be preferentially fixated overall across region viewing. These results suggest that objects are first selected covertly on the basis of their relative size and that subsequent overt selection is made considering object-context associations processed in extrafoveal vision. Once the object was fixated, inconsistency resulted in longer first fixation duration and longer total dwell time. As a whole, our findings indicate that observed impairment of oculomotor behavior when searching for an implausibly placed target is the combined product of disruption due to unreliable spatial expectations and prioritization of inconsistent objects before and during object fixation.

KW - Eye guidance

KW - Visual cognition

KW - Spatial expectations

KW - Spatial inconsistency

U2 - 10.1167/15.2.12

DO - 10.1167/15.2.12

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 2

ER -