Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory

M D Rugg, R E Mark, P Walla, A M Schloerscheidt, Stephen Birch, Kevin Allan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

525 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One presentation of a word to a subject is enough to change the way in which the word is processed subsequently, even when there is no conscious (explicit) memory of the original presentation. This phenomenon is known as implicit memory. The neural correlates of implicit memory have been studied previously, but they have never been compared with the correlates of explicit memory while holding task conditions constant or while using a procedure that ensured that the neural correlates were not 'contaminated' by explicit memory. Here we use scalp-recorded event-related brain potentials to identify neural activity associated with implicit and explicit memory during the performance of a recognition memory task. Relative to new words, recently studied words produced activity in three neuroanatomically and functionally dissociable neural populations. One of these populations was activated whether or not the word was consciously recognized, and its activity therefore represents a neural correlate of implicit memory. Thus, when task and memory contamination effects are eliminated, the neural correlates of explicit and implicit memory differ qualitatively.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-598
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume392
Issue number6676
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Apr 1998

Fingerprint

Scalp
Evoked Potentials
Population
Brain
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Brain Mapping
  • Evoked Potentials
  • Humans
  • Learning
  • Memory
  • Neurons
  • Vocabulary

Cite this

Rugg, M. D., Mark, R. E., Walla, P., Schloerscheidt, A. M., Birch, S., & Allan, K. (1998). Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 392(6676), 595-598. https://doi.org/10.1038/33396

Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. / Rugg, M D; Mark, R E; Walla, P; Schloerscheidt, A M; Birch, Stephen; Allan, Kevin.

In: Nature, Vol. 392, No. 6676, 09.04.1998, p. 595-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rugg, MD, Mark, RE, Walla, P, Schloerscheidt, AM, Birch, S & Allan, K 1998, 'Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory', Nature, vol. 392, no. 6676, pp. 595-598. https://doi.org/10.1038/33396
Rugg MD, Mark RE, Walla P, Schloerscheidt AM, Birch S, Allan K. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature. 1998 Apr 9;392(6676):595-598. https://doi.org/10.1038/33396
Rugg, M D ; Mark, R E ; Walla, P ; Schloerscheidt, A M ; Birch, Stephen ; Allan, Kevin. / Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. In: Nature. 1998 ; Vol. 392, No. 6676. pp. 595-598.
@article{a39f52a0578d4e5c88456e9cf9c92cdc,
title = "Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory",
abstract = "One presentation of a word to a subject is enough to change the way in which the word is processed subsequently, even when there is no conscious (explicit) memory of the original presentation. This phenomenon is known as implicit memory. The neural correlates of implicit memory have been studied previously, but they have never been compared with the correlates of explicit memory while holding task conditions constant or while using a procedure that ensured that the neural correlates were not 'contaminated' by explicit memory. Here we use scalp-recorded event-related brain potentials to identify neural activity associated with implicit and explicit memory during the performance of a recognition memory task. Relative to new words, recently studied words produced activity in three neuroanatomically and functionally dissociable neural populations. One of these populations was activated whether or not the word was consciously recognized, and its activity therefore represents a neural correlate of implicit memory. Thus, when task and memory contamination effects are eliminated, the neural correlates of explicit and implicit memory differ qualitatively.",
keywords = "Adult, Brain Mapping, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Learning, Memory, Neurons, Vocabulary",
author = "Rugg, {M D} and Mark, {R E} and P Walla and Schloerscheidt, {A M} and Stephen Birch and Kevin Allan",
year = "1998",
month = "4",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1038/33396",
language = "English",
volume = "392",
pages = "595--598",
journal = "Nature",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6676",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory

AU - Rugg, M D

AU - Mark, R E

AU - Walla, P

AU - Schloerscheidt, A M

AU - Birch, Stephen

AU - Allan, Kevin

PY - 1998/4/9

Y1 - 1998/4/9

N2 - One presentation of a word to a subject is enough to change the way in which the word is processed subsequently, even when there is no conscious (explicit) memory of the original presentation. This phenomenon is known as implicit memory. The neural correlates of implicit memory have been studied previously, but they have never been compared with the correlates of explicit memory while holding task conditions constant or while using a procedure that ensured that the neural correlates were not 'contaminated' by explicit memory. Here we use scalp-recorded event-related brain potentials to identify neural activity associated with implicit and explicit memory during the performance of a recognition memory task. Relative to new words, recently studied words produced activity in three neuroanatomically and functionally dissociable neural populations. One of these populations was activated whether or not the word was consciously recognized, and its activity therefore represents a neural correlate of implicit memory. Thus, when task and memory contamination effects are eliminated, the neural correlates of explicit and implicit memory differ qualitatively.

AB - One presentation of a word to a subject is enough to change the way in which the word is processed subsequently, even when there is no conscious (explicit) memory of the original presentation. This phenomenon is known as implicit memory. The neural correlates of implicit memory have been studied previously, but they have never been compared with the correlates of explicit memory while holding task conditions constant or while using a procedure that ensured that the neural correlates were not 'contaminated' by explicit memory. Here we use scalp-recorded event-related brain potentials to identify neural activity associated with implicit and explicit memory during the performance of a recognition memory task. Relative to new words, recently studied words produced activity in three neuroanatomically and functionally dissociable neural populations. One of these populations was activated whether or not the word was consciously recognized, and its activity therefore represents a neural correlate of implicit memory. Thus, when task and memory contamination effects are eliminated, the neural correlates of explicit and implicit memory differ qualitatively.

KW - Adult

KW - Brain Mapping

KW - Evoked Potentials

KW - Humans

KW - Learning

KW - Memory

KW - Neurons

KW - Vocabulary

U2 - 10.1038/33396

DO - 10.1038/33396

M3 - Article

VL - 392

SP - 595

EP - 598

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

SN - 0028-0836

IS - 6676

ER -