"Distracters" do not always distract

Visual working memory for angry faces is enhanced by incidental emotional words.

Margaret C Jackson, David EJ Linden, Jane E Raymond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We are often required to filter out distraction in order to focus on a primary task during which working memory (WM) is engaged. Previous research has shown that negative versus neutral distracters presented during a visual WM maintenance period significantly impair memory for neutral information. However, the contents of WM are often also emotional in nature. The question we address here is how incidental information might impact upon visual WM when both this and the memory items contain emotional information. We presented emotional versus neutral words during the maintenance interval of an emotional visual WM faces task. Participants encoded two angry or happy faces into WM, and several seconds into a 9 second maintenance period a negative, positive, or neutral word was flashed on the screen three times. A single neutral test face was presented for retrieval with a face identity that was either present or absent in the preceding study array. WM for angry face identities was significantly better when an emotional (negative or positive) versus neutral (or no) word was presented. In contrast, WM for happy face identities was not significantly affected by word valence. These findings suggest that the presence of emotion within an intervening stimulus boosts the emotional value of threat-related information maintained in visual WM and thus improves performance. In addition, we show that incidental events that are emotional in nature do not always distract from an ongoing WM task.
Original languageEnglish
Article number437
Number of pages9
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Maintenance
Emotions

Keywords

  • working memory
  • emotion
  • anger
  • faces

Cite this

"Distracters" do not always distract : Visual working memory for angry faces is enhanced by incidental emotional words. / Jackson, Margaret C; Linden, David EJ; Raymond, Jane E.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 3, 437, 10.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be9e3c8816d84c11b9c8f50dee73c658,
title = "{"}Distracters{"} do not always distract: Visual working memory for angry faces is enhanced by incidental emotional words.",
abstract = "We are often required to filter out distraction in order to focus on a primary task during which working memory (WM) is engaged. Previous research has shown that negative versus neutral distracters presented during a visual WM maintenance period significantly impair memory for neutral information. However, the contents of WM are often also emotional in nature. The question we address here is how incidental information might impact upon visual WM when both this and the memory items contain emotional information. We presented emotional versus neutral words during the maintenance interval of an emotional visual WM faces task. Participants encoded two angry or happy faces into WM, and several seconds into a 9 second maintenance period a negative, positive, or neutral word was flashed on the screen three times. A single neutral test face was presented for retrieval with a face identity that was either present or absent in the preceding study array. WM for angry face identities was significantly better when an emotional (negative or positive) versus neutral (or no) word was presented. In contrast, WM for happy face identities was not significantly affected by word valence. These findings suggest that the presence of emotion within an intervening stimulus boosts the emotional value of threat-related information maintained in visual WM and thus improves performance. In addition, we show that incidental events that are emotional in nature do not always distract from an ongoing WM task.",
keywords = "working memory, emotion, anger, faces",
author = "Jackson, {Margaret C} and Linden, {David EJ} and Raymond, {Jane E}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00437",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Distracters" do not always distract

T2 - Visual working memory for angry faces is enhanced by incidental emotional words.

AU - Jackson, Margaret C

AU - Linden, David EJ

AU - Raymond, Jane E

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - We are often required to filter out distraction in order to focus on a primary task during which working memory (WM) is engaged. Previous research has shown that negative versus neutral distracters presented during a visual WM maintenance period significantly impair memory for neutral information. However, the contents of WM are often also emotional in nature. The question we address here is how incidental information might impact upon visual WM when both this and the memory items contain emotional information. We presented emotional versus neutral words during the maintenance interval of an emotional visual WM faces task. Participants encoded two angry or happy faces into WM, and several seconds into a 9 second maintenance period a negative, positive, or neutral word was flashed on the screen three times. A single neutral test face was presented for retrieval with a face identity that was either present or absent in the preceding study array. WM for angry face identities was significantly better when an emotional (negative or positive) versus neutral (or no) word was presented. In contrast, WM for happy face identities was not significantly affected by word valence. These findings suggest that the presence of emotion within an intervening stimulus boosts the emotional value of threat-related information maintained in visual WM and thus improves performance. In addition, we show that incidental events that are emotional in nature do not always distract from an ongoing WM task.

AB - We are often required to filter out distraction in order to focus on a primary task during which working memory (WM) is engaged. Previous research has shown that negative versus neutral distracters presented during a visual WM maintenance period significantly impair memory for neutral information. However, the contents of WM are often also emotional in nature. The question we address here is how incidental information might impact upon visual WM when both this and the memory items contain emotional information. We presented emotional versus neutral words during the maintenance interval of an emotional visual WM faces task. Participants encoded two angry or happy faces into WM, and several seconds into a 9 second maintenance period a negative, positive, or neutral word was flashed on the screen three times. A single neutral test face was presented for retrieval with a face identity that was either present or absent in the preceding study array. WM for angry face identities was significantly better when an emotional (negative or positive) versus neutral (or no) word was presented. In contrast, WM for happy face identities was not significantly affected by word valence. These findings suggest that the presence of emotion within an intervening stimulus boosts the emotional value of threat-related information maintained in visual WM and thus improves performance. In addition, we show that incidental events that are emotional in nature do not always distract from an ongoing WM task.

KW - working memory

KW - emotion

KW - anger

KW - faces

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00437

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00437

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 437

ER -