Diurnal variation in harbour porpoise detection – potential implications for management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Robust information on animal distributions and foraging behaviour are required to target management and conservation measures for protected species and populations. Visual survey data are commonly used to model these distributions. However, because visual data can only be collected in daylight, modelled distributions and consequent management actions may fail to identify or protect important nocturnal habitats. We explore this issue using data from the Moray Firth, Scotland, where visual survey data have previously been used to characterise habitat use and distribution patterns of harbour porpoise. Marine predators such as harbour porpoise have a widespread distribution, are highly mobile, and are known to exhibit behavioural variation in relation to diel cycles. Here, we use long-term passive acoustic data which revealed habitat-specific differences in diel patterns of detection. Harbour porpoise were detected consistently during night and day in sandy areas with peaks in detection around sunrise and sunset, and at night in muddy areas. Detections also varied with depth, with the greatest proportion of detections during day recorded in shallower sandy areas, and the most at night recorded in deeper muddy areas. The proportion of detections with foraging buzzes detected increased slightly during the night and in muddy habitats. These findings suggest that the importance of muddy habitats could be underestimated when using visual survey data alone. This highlights the value of using a combination of visual and acoustic methods both to characterise species distribution and to support efforts to develop appropriate spatio-temporal management of key habitats.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-232
Number of pages10
JournalMarine Ecology Progress Series
Volume570
Early online date27 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Phocoena
Phocoena phocoena
porpoise
diurnal variation
Ecosystem
harbor
habitats
habitat
Acoustics
acoustics
Animal Distribution
foraging
Muraenidae
Time Management
acoustic method
protected species
acoustic data
Scotland
foraging behavior
habitat use

Keywords

  • phocoena phocoena
  • C-POD
  • passive acoustic monitoring
  • management
  • distribution
  • modelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

@article{ee34ceb693d1405dbffbf2fa1ab56e06,
title = "Diurnal variation in harbour porpoise detection – potential implications for management",
abstract = "Robust information on animal distributions and foraging behaviour are required to target management and conservation measures for protected species and populations. Visual survey data are commonly used to model these distributions. However, because visual data can only be collected in daylight, modelled distributions and consequent management actions may fail to identify or protect important nocturnal habitats. We explore this issue using data from the Moray Firth, Scotland, where visual survey data have previously been used to characterise habitat use and distribution patterns of harbour porpoise. Marine predators such as harbour porpoise have a widespread distribution, are highly mobile, and are known to exhibit behavioural variation in relation to diel cycles. Here, we use long-term passive acoustic data which revealed habitat-specific differences in diel patterns of detection. Harbour porpoise were detected consistently during night and day in sandy areas with peaks in detection around sunrise and sunset, and at night in muddy areas. Detections also varied with depth, with the greatest proportion of detections during day recorded in shallower sandy areas, and the most at night recorded in deeper muddy areas. The proportion of detections with foraging buzzes detected increased slightly during the night and in muddy habitats. These findings suggest that the importance of muddy habitats could be underestimated when using visual survey data alone. This highlights the value of using a combination of visual and acoustic methods both to characterise species distribution and to support efforts to develop appropriate spatio-temporal management of key habitats.",
keywords = "phocoena phocoena , C-POD, passive acoustic monitoring, management, distribution, modelling",
author = "Williamson, {L D} and Brookes, {K L} and Scott, {B E} and Graham, {I M} and Thompson, {P M}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.3354/meps12118",
language = "English",
volume = "570",
pages = "223--232",
journal = "Marine Ecology Progress Series",
issn = "0171-8630",
publisher = "Inter-Research",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diurnal variation in harbour porpoise detection – potential implications for management

AU - Williamson, L D

AU - Brookes, K L

AU - Scott, B E

AU - Graham, I M

AU - Thompson, P M

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Robust information on animal distributions and foraging behaviour are required to target management and conservation measures for protected species and populations. Visual survey data are commonly used to model these distributions. However, because visual data can only be collected in daylight, modelled distributions and consequent management actions may fail to identify or protect important nocturnal habitats. We explore this issue using data from the Moray Firth, Scotland, where visual survey data have previously been used to characterise habitat use and distribution patterns of harbour porpoise. Marine predators such as harbour porpoise have a widespread distribution, are highly mobile, and are known to exhibit behavioural variation in relation to diel cycles. Here, we use long-term passive acoustic data which revealed habitat-specific differences in diel patterns of detection. Harbour porpoise were detected consistently during night and day in sandy areas with peaks in detection around sunrise and sunset, and at night in muddy areas. Detections also varied with depth, with the greatest proportion of detections during day recorded in shallower sandy areas, and the most at night recorded in deeper muddy areas. The proportion of detections with foraging buzzes detected increased slightly during the night and in muddy habitats. These findings suggest that the importance of muddy habitats could be underestimated when using visual survey data alone. This highlights the value of using a combination of visual and acoustic methods both to characterise species distribution and to support efforts to develop appropriate spatio-temporal management of key habitats.

AB - Robust information on animal distributions and foraging behaviour are required to target management and conservation measures for protected species and populations. Visual survey data are commonly used to model these distributions. However, because visual data can only be collected in daylight, modelled distributions and consequent management actions may fail to identify or protect important nocturnal habitats. We explore this issue using data from the Moray Firth, Scotland, where visual survey data have previously been used to characterise habitat use and distribution patterns of harbour porpoise. Marine predators such as harbour porpoise have a widespread distribution, are highly mobile, and are known to exhibit behavioural variation in relation to diel cycles. Here, we use long-term passive acoustic data which revealed habitat-specific differences in diel patterns of detection. Harbour porpoise were detected consistently during night and day in sandy areas with peaks in detection around sunrise and sunset, and at night in muddy areas. Detections also varied with depth, with the greatest proportion of detections during day recorded in shallower sandy areas, and the most at night recorded in deeper muddy areas. The proportion of detections with foraging buzzes detected increased slightly during the night and in muddy habitats. These findings suggest that the importance of muddy habitats could be underestimated when using visual survey data alone. This highlights the value of using a combination of visual and acoustic methods both to characterise species distribution and to support efforts to develop appropriate spatio-temporal management of key habitats.

KW - phocoena phocoena

KW - C-POD

KW - passive acoustic monitoring

KW - management

KW - distribution

KW - modelling

U2 - 10.3354/meps12118

DO - 10.3354/meps12118

M3 - Article

VL - 570

SP - 223

EP - 232

JO - Marine Ecology Progress Series

JF - Marine Ecology Progress Series

SN - 0171-8630

ER -