Diversification strategies in banking

Like lemmings falling off a cliff

Peter Rejchrt, Gerhard Kling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper develops a theory of bank diversification across business segments and income streams. Motives for diversification include the alleged impact on performance, risk, and value; however, the theory also permits herd behavior. The paper tests four propositions using hand-collected business segment data of the top 100 banks from 1998 to 2010. The study distinguishes between retail, corporate, investment, and private banking and various income streams. Empirical evidence suggests that diversification enhanced performance but did not reduce risk. After the financial crisis, diversification contributed to risks. Diversification did not deliver economic value added and only moved banks closer to the efficient frontier in the pre-crisis period. These findings caution strategists against applying theories developed in finance to understanding business strategies in a different strategic space.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10182
JournalAcademy of Management Proceedings
Volume2018
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Banking
Diversification
Diversification strategy
Income
Herd behavior
Economic value added
Empirical evidence
Corporate investment
Efficient frontier
Finance
Financial crisis
Retail
Business strategy

Cite this

Diversification strategies in banking : Like lemmings falling off a cliff. / Rejchrt, Peter; Kling, Gerhard.

In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2018, No. 1, 10182, 08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a41c3c760f4494aa45f80dae63c71df,
title = "Diversification strategies in banking: Like lemmings falling off a cliff",
abstract = "This paper develops a theory of bank diversification across business segments and income streams. Motives for diversification include the alleged impact on performance, risk, and value; however, the theory also permits herd behavior. The paper tests four propositions using hand-collected business segment data of the top 100 banks from 1998 to 2010. The study distinguishes between retail, corporate, investment, and private banking and various income streams. Empirical evidence suggests that diversification enhanced performance but did not reduce risk. After the financial crisis, diversification contributed to risks. Diversification did not deliver economic value added and only moved banks closer to the efficient frontier in the pre-crisis period. These findings caution strategists against applying theories developed in finance to understanding business strategies in a different strategic space.",
author = "Peter Rejchrt and Gerhard Kling",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.5465/ambpp.2018.10182abstract",
language = "English",
volume = "2018",
journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
issn = "0065-0668",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversification strategies in banking

T2 - Like lemmings falling off a cliff

AU - Rejchrt, Peter

AU - Kling, Gerhard

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - This paper develops a theory of bank diversification across business segments and income streams. Motives for diversification include the alleged impact on performance, risk, and value; however, the theory also permits herd behavior. The paper tests four propositions using hand-collected business segment data of the top 100 banks from 1998 to 2010. The study distinguishes between retail, corporate, investment, and private banking and various income streams. Empirical evidence suggests that diversification enhanced performance but did not reduce risk. After the financial crisis, diversification contributed to risks. Diversification did not deliver economic value added and only moved banks closer to the efficient frontier in the pre-crisis period. These findings caution strategists against applying theories developed in finance to understanding business strategies in a different strategic space.

AB - This paper develops a theory of bank diversification across business segments and income streams. Motives for diversification include the alleged impact on performance, risk, and value; however, the theory also permits herd behavior. The paper tests four propositions using hand-collected business segment data of the top 100 banks from 1998 to 2010. The study distinguishes between retail, corporate, investment, and private banking and various income streams. Empirical evidence suggests that diversification enhanced performance but did not reduce risk. After the financial crisis, diversification contributed to risks. Diversification did not deliver economic value added and only moved banks closer to the efficient frontier in the pre-crisis period. These findings caution strategists against applying theories developed in finance to understanding business strategies in a different strategic space.

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/diversification-strategies-banking-like-lemmings-falling-cliff

U2 - 10.5465/ambpp.2018.10182abstract

DO - 10.5465/ambpp.2018.10182abstract

M3 - Article

VL - 2018

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

M1 - 10182

ER -