Do educational interventions improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors? A systematic review

Sarah Ross, Yoon K Loke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

120 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our aim was to review systematically the literature on educational interventions to improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Educational Resource Information Center, British Education Index, PsycINFO, CINAHL, TIMELIT, Cochrane Trials Database and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were: educational interventions to improve medical student and/or junior doctors' prescribing, in primary or secondary care settings, and published after 1990. After screening 3189 records, we retrieved 11 controlled and four 'before-and-after' trials. Ten controlled trials showed improvements in the scores of the intervention group on written scenarios or clinical examination stations, but one study in junior doctors showed no effect on real-life prescription errors. Only one intervention [the World Health Organization (WHO) Good Prescribing Guide, in six randomized trials] had been tested in a variety of international settings and across a range of students at different levels. All four 'before-and-after' trials reported significant improvements in written tests or clinical stations. However, most studies tested only small numbers of participants and were affected by a range of methodological flaws. There is only moderate evidence in the literature to inform medical schools about how to prepare medical students for the challenges of prescribing. The WHO Good Prescribing Guide is the only model that has been widely used and shown to improve prescribing. Although it is based on sound principles, there is a need for further development. Robust methods of assessment are required to show clearly whether particular teaching interventions are successful.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)662-670
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Volume67
Issue number6
Early online date23 Feb 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Literature
Information Centers
Secondary Care
Medical Schools
MEDLINE
Prescriptions
Primary Health Care
Teaching
Databases
Students
Education

Keywords

  • clinical competence
  • drug prescriptions
  • education, medical, undergraduate
  • humans
  • medical staff, hospital
  • medication errors
  • randomized controlled trials as topic

Cite this

Do educational interventions improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors? A systematic review. / Ross, Sarah; Loke, Yoon K.

In: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 67, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 662-670.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5aa78f3a69454069ac8959d05aa80dba,
title = "Do educational interventions improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors?: A systematic review",
abstract = "Our aim was to review systematically the literature on educational interventions to improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Educational Resource Information Center, British Education Index, PsycINFO, CINAHL, TIMELIT, Cochrane Trials Database and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were: educational interventions to improve medical student and/or junior doctors' prescribing, in primary or secondary care settings, and published after 1990. After screening 3189 records, we retrieved 11 controlled and four 'before-and-after' trials. Ten controlled trials showed improvements in the scores of the intervention group on written scenarios or clinical examination stations, but one study in junior doctors showed no effect on real-life prescription errors. Only one intervention [the World Health Organization (WHO) Good Prescribing Guide, in six randomized trials] had been tested in a variety of international settings and across a range of students at different levels. All four 'before-and-after' trials reported significant improvements in written tests or clinical stations. However, most studies tested only small numbers of participants and were affected by a range of methodological flaws. There is only moderate evidence in the literature to inform medical schools about how to prepare medical students for the challenges of prescribing. The WHO Good Prescribing Guide is the only model that has been widely used and shown to improve prescribing. Although it is based on sound principles, there is a need for further development. Robust methods of assessment are required to show clearly whether particular teaching interventions are successful.",
keywords = "clinical competence, drug prescriptions, education, medical, undergraduate, humans, medical staff, hospital, medication errors, randomized controlled trials as topic",
author = "Sarah Ross and Loke, {Yoon K}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03395.x",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "662--670",
journal = "British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology",
issn = "0306-5251",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do educational interventions improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors?

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Ross, Sarah

AU - Loke, Yoon K

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Our aim was to review systematically the literature on educational interventions to improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Educational Resource Information Center, British Education Index, PsycINFO, CINAHL, TIMELIT, Cochrane Trials Database and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were: educational interventions to improve medical student and/or junior doctors' prescribing, in primary or secondary care settings, and published after 1990. After screening 3189 records, we retrieved 11 controlled and four 'before-and-after' trials. Ten controlled trials showed improvements in the scores of the intervention group on written scenarios or clinical examination stations, but one study in junior doctors showed no effect on real-life prescription errors. Only one intervention [the World Health Organization (WHO) Good Prescribing Guide, in six randomized trials] had been tested in a variety of international settings and across a range of students at different levels. All four 'before-and-after' trials reported significant improvements in written tests or clinical stations. However, most studies tested only small numbers of participants and were affected by a range of methodological flaws. There is only moderate evidence in the literature to inform medical schools about how to prepare medical students for the challenges of prescribing. The WHO Good Prescribing Guide is the only model that has been widely used and shown to improve prescribing. Although it is based on sound principles, there is a need for further development. Robust methods of assessment are required to show clearly whether particular teaching interventions are successful.

AB - Our aim was to review systematically the literature on educational interventions to improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Educational Resource Information Center, British Education Index, PsycINFO, CINAHL, TIMELIT, Cochrane Trials Database and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were: educational interventions to improve medical student and/or junior doctors' prescribing, in primary or secondary care settings, and published after 1990. After screening 3189 records, we retrieved 11 controlled and four 'before-and-after' trials. Ten controlled trials showed improvements in the scores of the intervention group on written scenarios or clinical examination stations, but one study in junior doctors showed no effect on real-life prescription errors. Only one intervention [the World Health Organization (WHO) Good Prescribing Guide, in six randomized trials] had been tested in a variety of international settings and across a range of students at different levels. All four 'before-and-after' trials reported significant improvements in written tests or clinical stations. However, most studies tested only small numbers of participants and were affected by a range of methodological flaws. There is only moderate evidence in the literature to inform medical schools about how to prepare medical students for the challenges of prescribing. The WHO Good Prescribing Guide is the only model that has been widely used and shown to improve prescribing. Although it is based on sound principles, there is a need for further development. Robust methods of assessment are required to show clearly whether particular teaching interventions are successful.

KW - clinical competence

KW - drug prescriptions

KW - education, medical, undergraduate

KW - humans

KW - medical staff, hospital

KW - medication errors

KW - randomized controlled trials as topic

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03395.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03395.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19594535

VL - 67

SP - 662

EP - 670

JO - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

JF - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

SN - 0306-5251

IS - 6

ER -